Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged

Regarding the adoption of technology by professionals, specifically in the case of Ineos, a team with a budget of approximately $55 million. They have taken a marginal gains approach, going as far as providing individual washing machines and dryers for each team member to reduce the chances of saddle sores. However, they refuse to adopt obvious performance gains available to others. This seems tiresome justification used whenever someone doesn't believe in a particular technology. On the other hand, amateurs can use whatever technology they please. Can you explain this discrepancy?"