Old 05-08-22, 07:54 PM
  #13  
MoAlpha
• —
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,256

Bikes: Shmikes

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10182 Post(s)
Liked 5,880 Times in 3,168 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclezen
Thanks ! Had a similar conversation with MD, during the first few weeks of diagnosis. We'll have to revisit that at our next meeting.
I'll try to find any references for Warburg's research on this. Anything on this.
Between constant low O2 Blood levels (High 70's low 80's), constant level of 'dehydration' (really hard to stay well hydrated at altitude), and constant overall system stress, the arrived at supposition is that the period at high altitude was not casual, but precipitated the explosive tumor growth.
...wasn't planning to go this far into this part of conversation, but I appreciate all the info. Will help to keep me 'real' on what might be possible... We'll see this summer.
Anyway, it would be a great thing to have metrics which can benchmark systemic conditions, for cycling.
Ride on
Yuri
The cancer thing is known as the “Warburg Hypothesis” and it’s been part of the canon for close to 100 years. It’s a fascinating read at a minimum. Good luck and enjoy whatever you decide to do.
MoAlpha is offline