View Single Post
Old 12-20-11, 10:28 PM
  #18  
Tabagas_Ru
`
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by christ0ph
It also may not be aspartame, it may be something else.. Also, be aware that there is bisphenol-a in can linings. BPA is an endocrine disruptor. It appears to be associated with obesity, statistically.
Are the sodas you are drinking packaged in plastic bottles or aluminum cans with a plastic liner?
Since you are versed in the subject of BPA, as evidenced by the large amount of articles you've read, could you please help me understand why BPA would be scrutinized so?

Could not the food in the packaging in contact with the BPA cause one be unhealthy regardless of the packaging?

Are not the purveyors of said food, who powerful and pecunious, risk becoming impuissant if people were to stop consuming their food no matter what it is packaged in?

Could the edifice of the processed food industry be interested in deflecting the blame from the food to the packaging, whence a move is made to abstain from the offensive packaging, such as to polish the facade of the edifice from whence it's motile bowels the offending matter was moved?
Tabagas_Ru is offline