Originally Posted by
Six jours
You so badly interpret my posts that, again, there really seems no point in responding, because you then misinterpret my responses. No actual information seems to make into the loop.
Why don't you explain yourself then, clearly and concisely?
"
And anybody who truly believes that the results of not wearing a bicycle helmet can be expected to be "not pretty" is either a truly horrible cyclist or completely uninformed." might mean that you believe that the term is understated, or it might have been meant in the literal sense of disparagement that a helmet could possibly help in a car-bike collision. Surely you don't actually mean the latter?