Old 07-23-20, 10:03 AM
  #22  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times in 4,692 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Earning a PhD implies that you (under the guidance of a mentor) have shown expertise in the very specific field/topic in which you did research. Along with the topical knowledge of that very specific field is an understanding of the accepted scientific research models and types of data/experiments/observations and expectations of that field, and also the accepted methods of analyzing that information (again, in that field).

Having a PhD in geology makes one an expert in bicycle tire research about as much as earning MD in orthopedics makes one able to diagnose heart problems. Sure, they will likely understand better than the average Joe, but it is not their area of expertise.

Further, getting a PhD is just the first step. It is what you do AFTER that which determines if you are an expert in your field. Or have much credibility as a scientist at all.
Well said.

For example, this person has a PhD in my field - and from Harvard, which is a top program. But he is widely regarded (rightly so) as a joke. He literally made up sources for some of his books.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote: