Originally Posted by
PeteHski
For sure cycling is "easier" than running. So if you took that totally untrained group, do you think they would expend more energy riding a bike for a "fair amount of time and distance" or running for "a few moments at any speed"?
It sort of endorses my point that cycling is a more efficient way of expending energy than running for most people.
I think they would still expend more energy running.
And almost certainly beat up their bodies much more.