Thread: Crank Length?
View Single Post
Old 05-16-23, 10:36 AM
  #8  
marathon marke
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 64

Bikes: Felt F65, Trek FX 7.3, Centurion Professional

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Cadence and load is more a function of gearing than crank length. Shorter cranks will naturally increase your cadence in a particular gear (pedalling a shorter circumference), but shifting even one gear will more than compensate for the difference.

The only thing to consider with crank length is your preferred range of leg motion. I know of 2 very experienced fitters who both generally favour shorter cranks, especially if you are of average height or less and/or have limited joint flexibility.

One of them published a review of crank length based on various previous studies (some conflicting) and his own fitting experience with hundreds of clients. The bottom line was to go shorter when in any doubt. While there are various potential issues with longer cranks, there are very few with shorter cranks.

My personal experience is that I can’t tell any significant difference between 170, 172.5 and 175 mm cranks. I’m 6’ tall with relatively long legs.
So what length do you use?
marathon marke is offline