View Single Post
Old 03-29-21, 02:52 PM
  #9  
joesch
Senior Member
 
joesch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,731

Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Liked 778 Times in 496 Posts
Originally Posted by Hiro11
To generalize:
- higher BB, the actual effect this has on handling is debatable and I won't argue about it here
- steeper head angle and higher trail leading possibly to more responsive handling, again arguable
- less tire clearance
- close-ratio cross-specific gearing
- cantilever brakes (I assume you're talking about a 2010 Colnago Prestige?)
- low stack granting an aggressive position

A CX bike can work well for racier gravel ride, especially if you find one that can fit wider (~45mm) tires. I have both a racy CX bike and a relaxed gravel bike and like riding both on gravel. They are very different bikes in how they ride.
Yes the Colnago C50 Cross which is a CX circa 2010 and has cantilever brakes. I really want disc brakes.
The C50 carbon fiber is a very nice ride as I have the road version and its one of the best I have rode.
Not sure how much diff the AL would be for a <=2K$ gravel bike, probably good wheels/tires would make a bigger diff?
joesch is offline