Originally Posted by
Papa Tom
I almost posted this in a thread that asked about helmet-mounted mirrors, but I am not interested in starting another debate over bar-mounted vs. helmet-mounted. I think they are both good options, each one suitable for a different type of rider.
However, on my commute the other day, I realized what it is about my bar-mounted mirror that I like so much. Not only does it let me see what's going on around me; it is also a clearly visible indicator to motorists that I can see them coming up behind or beside me.
When I am driving a car behind a cyclist, I can never see if he or she is wearing a helmet mirror, so if the cyclist doesn't turn around and make eye-contact with me, I have no idea if I am visible and if it is safe to pass. When I see a bar-mounted mirror and I see the cyclist gazing in its direction, I am FAIRLY confident that the presence of my automobile is known. Helmet-mounted mirrors just don't announce themselves as boldly and blatantly.
Honestly, I think daytime lights AND mirrors (bar or helmet) should be REQUIRED on all bikes ridden on the road; but as long as they aren't, I'd like drivers to know that I am using one.
I very much like the handlebar mirrors that I use all the time and appreciate the help they give me in quickly determining traffic conditions to the rear.
I see zero advantage to me if somehow my mirror is seen by approaching motorists, and consider it highly unlikely that most, if any motorists notice it, let alone consider whether I see them or not, or consider making any driving decisions based on that unlikely observation.
I am concerned that motorists see a bicyclist in front of them and respond appropriately, and I do not think the presence or not of a bicyclist's mirror makes a bit of difference in motorists' response.
BTW, I ardently disagree with your desire to mandate that all bicyclists pay for and use YOUR preferred bicycling accessories.