View Single Post
Old 02-06-23, 01:20 PM
  #37  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,399
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 4,837 Times in 2,991 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
The (elite-level) teams are actually riding tubulars. Often relabeled. Tubeless has 3 insurmountable disadvantages for performance riding:
  • Higher rim weights than tubular rims. This is inherent to the cross-section of the rim: clincher/tubeless rims simply require more material.
  • The inability to run at high pressures (yes, higher pressures deliver lower rolling resistance)
  • Far greater safety risks in the event of a sudden deflation. On tubulars, the tire stays stuck tight to the rim, and you can ride it for a considerable distance.

Tubeless is a good choice for sponsor marketing campaigns, or for bikes on the roof racks of the team cars, or for the domestiques on flat inconsequential stages.
This ^ is complete bs, but not surprising from this guy.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski: