View Single Post
Old 10-03-22, 09:50 PM
  #80  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times in 523 Posts
Originally Posted by raqball
Courts can and do issue garnishment and lean orders all the time... If you are expecting the judge to send his cousin to break the legs of the person not paying then sure, they'll do nothing..




Video evidence is crystal clear and can show exactly what happened. It can capture the events as they unfolded, license plates and other pertinent information. Eye-witnesses are often the exact opposite of that and are very unreliable. Video evidence could easily win a case where if there was no video it might be a coin flip as to who the judge or jury believes..

In the event of a hit and run, video evidence of the car description and plate might be the only way the driver is ever caught.
All those "can's", "might's", "often's" ... just point me to some final rulings. Thanks.

Last edited by Leisesturm; 10-03-22 at 09:55 PM.
Leisesturm is offline