Originally Posted by
MoAlpha
Post some links and we'll get into those studies. I already know none of them has 20,000 participants or a follow-up period of 8-17 years, and none of them is a prospective human trial of intermittent fasting with long-term clinical outcomes.
When and if this one comes out a form where we can see what they actually did in terms of sampling and statistics, we can critique it too.
What's your take from the study? Are you convinced that only eating for 8 hours a day increases risk of heart attack by 91%? Who funded the study? The processed food industry to convince you to eat 24 hours a day? This particular study is ridiculous. How can any correlation be attained without even knowing what foods were consumed during the feeding window?
Why is it that the time period they ate in caused heart disease, rather than the food they ate in that time period? Increased by 91% compared to what group, the general population? Possibly the average population had a healthier diet than this group. Too many questions unanswered for this study to have any value beyond click bate considering how popular IM fasting is becoming.