View Single Post
Old 03-08-22, 04:02 PM
  #5143  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,472

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3168 Post(s)
Liked 1,724 Times in 1,042 Posts
Originally Posted by BoozyMcliverRot
Again, I would not take that to be true based on the Velospace discussion you linked to, and I would not take it to be true just because you think it is. You know, “trust but verify.”

For example, using the Web Archive Wayback Machine, I went back to 2016 and looked at the specs for both the Flite 100 and the Kilo TT. While the superficial commonalities you note are there, the geometries are different, evidenced by the Flite100 having a 275mm BB height, while the KTT has a taller 282mm of BB height.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120615...ometry_tt.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20120624...-flite-100.jpg

So, while you said they were the same, which they aren’t, and also said they were at some point, that wasn’t true in ‘16 either. When was it true? Was it ever true? I’m not saying it wasn’t ever true, only that some of the statements made in the discussion were incorrect.
chaadster is offline