Old 02-13-19, 10:50 AM
  #3  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,366 Times in 947 Posts
Originally Posted by b0geyman
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190212120114.htm

Kind of a disheartening thing for me to read, as something I have been working on in my trainer sessions this offseason is boosting my natural cadence.
It's useless.

What is a "recreational cyclist"?

If a high cadence is useful for "professional" cyclists, it might be useful for people who ride a lot. The study doesn't get anywhere near providing that information.

It shouldn't be surprising that a high cadence isn't useful for "casual" cyclists.
njkayaker is offline