Originally Posted by
genejockey
Apparently not.
The estimation of maximal heart rate (HRmax) has been a feature of exercise physiology and related applied sciences since the late 1930's. The estimation of HRmax has been largely based on the formula; HRmax=220-age. This equation is often presented in textbooks without explanation or citation to original research. In addition, the formula and related concepts are included in most certification exams within sports medicine, exercise physiology, and fitness. Despite the acceptance of this formula, research spanning more than two decades reveals the large error inherent in the estimation of HRmax (Sxy=7-11 b/min). Ironically, inquiry into the history of this formula reveals that it was not developed from original research, but resulted from observation based on data from approximately 11 references consisting of published research or unpublished scientific compilations. Consequently, the formula HRmax=220-age has no scientific merit for use in exercise physiology and related fields.
Reminds me of the "older women have humongous risks with pregnancy" thing. Apparently all the "data" that supports that is based on early 19th century French peasant women who probably had a lot of other things contributing to their pregnancy complications. My understanding is that more recent research suggests that the risks are not nearly so severe (not non-existent, but perhaps overstated.)