Old 09-28-22, 07:32 AM
  #40  
vespasianus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 700

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Manufacturers are able to make such thin seat stays because they're not doing a lot of the heavy lifting. See Steven Kruijswijk's Cervelo: he crashed and then finished a TdF stage without noticing that he'd completely lost one of his seatstays -




Just riding around isn't going to stress that area enough to cause that kind of damage. An impact, like from a branch swept in to the wheel, is more likely to cause the type of damage seen on your 'stays. Knowing this explains why Spec "dragged their feet."
The same reason, if you look at a steel framed English bike, the stays are crazy, crazy thin. On a road bike, the front triangle and the chain stays bear all the load.

But failures do happen. For the old MTB folks, Titus as a company bit the dust when their Motolite replacement, the FTM, had a really bad habit of snapping seat stays.

Last edited by vespasianus; 09-28-22 at 07:40 AM.
vespasianus is offline