View Single Post
Old 06-30-22, 11:25 AM
Should Be More Popular
datlas's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 39,420

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 535 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19087 Post(s)
Liked 5,828 Times in 2,852 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse View Post
A high cadence of 100+ may feel "easy", but it is not metabolically or aerobically efficient.

You can't change physics.

Scott et at, The Effect of Cadence on the Mechanics and Energetics of Constant Power Cycling
I don't disagree, but my suspicion is trained/conditioned cyclists might perform better at self-selected cadence which is typically 80-90. Untrained cyclists are more likely to perform at 60 like the graph shows. I have not done a literature search, though.
Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is online now