View Single Post
Old 12-25-21, 10:36 AM
  #19  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times in 1,003 Posts
Originally Posted by KerryIrons
Your characterization of frame materials is flawed from the get-go. Back in the day, "everybody knew" that aluminum frames were flexy because frames like Alan and Vitus were aluminum and were flexy. Then Klein and Cannondale came out with "huge" (for the time) frame tubes and all of a sudden "everybody knew" that Al frames were uncomfortably stiff. Early CF frames were noodles too. Until Litespeed brought shaped tubing to the party, Ti frames were "known" to be flexy. Each frame material can be tailored to a given ride characteristic with the only difference being the final frame weight.
Though to be fair, the OP is supposedly basing his impressions of non-Ti bikes having ridden 15 different bikes of varying frame materials, none of which include Ti though.
Sy Reene is offline