View Single Post
Old 04-12-21, 06:00 PM
  #63  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times in 1,002 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Whitt & Wilson give a couple of formulas to find the equivalent drag on drums of different diameters. Both bicyclerollingresistance.com and Tom Anhalt's tests make this adjustment to convert from drums to "flat" roads. In addition, below the impedance breakpoint, the correlation of real road tests and (adjusted for drum diameter using the Whitt & Wilson equation) drum tests are quite high. For two tires A and B, if Crr(A) > Crr(B) on drums then *almost always* Crr(A) > Crr(B) on the road (below the impedance breakpoint). The only times I've seen the ordering switch is when the tires were very close to begin with. That's why as long as you stay below the impedance breakpoint, we still do roller testing. On road field testing is much more time-consuming.

That said, we likely would not have observed the impedance breakpoint without careful field testing, so it's good to be able to do them (even thought they're time-consuming and kind of a pain in the butt).
What's your take on the Flo testing, that evidently puts 2 disparate tire widths (25 and 32mm) both with optimal rolling resistance at about the 95psi mark?
Sy Reene is offline