Old 10-18-22, 12:18 PM
  #3  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
Stem length is all about fit. (At least for properly sized road bikes.) Yes, changing the length affects steering some but very rarely to anyplace unsafe.

I raced an 11 cm. Rode decades commuting on a 18 cm. I have long arms so I steer toward stems most would call very long. For me, stem length and wheight ((edit: oops!) are critical elements in making a bike that works well for me. (And I figured out years ago that I can trade height for length and keep the position I love.) But as far as fork offset goes? Who cares? If you stay ignorant, that will never, ever matter.

Just my views after a few miles of riding a few different bikes.

And edit: The great Eddy Merckx (and by default, also God) was said to ride 12 cm stems. So by the rule of stem length equalling fork offset, I should have had all three of my custom frames built with 120mm fork rake. I'm guessing that a head tube angle of around 45 degrees would be needed to get proper steering. That would push my bikes' front centers forward about 15". To keep proper weight center over the wheels, I'd have to push the rear wheel back about 10". New wheelbase? ~65". New total bike length? About 92" or nearly 8'. Time to modify my garage for bike storage.

Last edited by 79pmooney; 10-18-22 at 08:06 PM.
79pmooney is online now  
Likes For 79pmooney: