Old 12-04-20, 10:23 AM
  #14  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
Originally Posted by gauvins
I have a reasonably good caliper, certified at 0.02mm accuracy.

The problem wrt measuring a bike chain is that the way you position your caliper will have a definite impact on the reading. I took 30+ readings over a couple of weeks, on a slightly used but clean chain. The measurement MAPE (mean average percent error) turned out to be 0.28%. (compare it to the critical value of 0.5% at which a chain might/should be retired and you may conclude that it is too high or somewhat ok). My personal conclusion is that using a caliper isn't particularly useful.

I find it much easier to nail a new chain to the wall use it as a reference for the chains I use in rotation -- I hang the used chain on top of the reference (i.e. hung to the same nail) and retire it it gets close to one link longer. A chain is much cheaper than an accurate caliper, more accurate (probably < 0.05%), and is fast and foolproof.
By one link, do you mean half a link (one side plate)? Half a link over an 110 link chain would be about 0.5%, so that would be a good measurement. Do you use that chain and hang up a new one?
pdlamb is offline