Old 06-09-20, 09:31 PM
  #24  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times in 945 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
It's more complicated engineering, less complicated for daily use.
For "daily use", the current sensors are not complicated at all.

The cost of engineering such an overly-complicated solution has a poor pay-back considering how cheap existing sensors that work well are.

It would also likely require more power, which would mean a larger head-unit or shorter run times. Neither of which is well-favored by the people who it would be marketed to.

​​​​​
​​​​​​
With current sensors, you don't have to worry about keeping a camera lens clean.

​​​​​​


​​​

Last edited by njkayaker; 06-09-20 at 09:47 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Likes For njkayaker: