Originally Posted by
downtube42
So i checked, and your quote is indeed factually incorrect, and I think misleading.
Boy, don't understand the angst here. You're right, I ignored the one time another winner hit double digits, the previous outlier. I don't see that it changes much. Nothing misleading or factually incorrect about this being the slowest race to date. A reasonable person would even see this as being well off the norm, the numbers are pretty clear.
I thought about weather as well, but with as many times as this race has been run hard to believe there weren't other years with bad weather. So figured maybe there were other reasons, like rule or route changes, maybe the not as many people racing due to covid. Thought someone might have something tangible beyond speculation.
Why so defensive?