Old 10-16-21, 04:56 AM
  #9  
dwsmartins
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
What cassette are you using now? Lowering the gearing (by using a smaller chainring or bigger cog) actually puts more torque on the freehub, and Shimano used to have max cog ratings for some freehubs to prevent damage...

EDIT. Found a note in an old thread on the subject:



From the other thread, I like the idea of using tandem-rated parts, even though that may not be cheap. It doesn't sound like you're doing anything wrong, the parts just aren't up for it.
I'm using a SunRace 11-40t 8s cassette. Looks like I'm overloading the freehub, as they're usually intended for 34t max.

But what about 2x10s bikes with 42t cassettes and 36-22t cranks? The torque applied on then should be similar or even greater to what I'm putting on mine. The FH-T610 is listed as compatible with this setup, but it's freehub body looks similar to the FH-M430 I'm currently using. Some shops around the web even sold replacement freehubs supposedly compatible with both of then.

If only Shimano published torque spec for their freehub bodies...
dwsmartins is offline