Thread: Shorter Cranks
View Single Post
Old 05-12-22, 02:13 PM
  #23  
sjanzeir
BF's Resident Dumbass
 
sjanzeir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566

Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,494 Times in 496 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Yeah, I just have no experience riding on a bike with 20" wheels and have no idea what that might do to the effects of changes in crank length or even if they have anything to do with each other. I'm thinking that the smaller wheels mean that you get less benefit from increasing your cadence, is that wrong?
It's more right than wrong. The smaller wheel size is primarily compensated for with a bigger chainring (52t om my Hemingway and 53t on my Mu, but plenty of folding bike riders swap 8n even bigger ones.)

With that being said, part of fun of smaller wheels is that the quicker acceleration. It's a great feeling when you find yourself up to speed in a couple of spins of the crank. With geared small-wheelers, the ability to throw three or four gears in quick succession as you peel off adds to the joy.
sjanzeir is offline  
Likes For sjanzeir: