Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
The elevated risk of injury to a cyclist by a vision impaired motorist due to rising or setting sun is the issue. The reason a cyclist should avoid if at all possible riding in traffic under the hazardous visual conditions discussed in this thread has nothing to do with what damage the cyclist might cause to others under these conditions, that is your construct.
Well, if we're going to randomly
bold things, please let me
point out that you were the one who equated drivers with cyclists,
"You can't imagine that motorists, like cyclists, don't always have the luxury of alternative routes or alternate times to travel such a route?" therefore making the differences in responsibilities between the two different types of operators relevant.
That "equivalency" is your construct.