Old 11-17-21, 05:58 PM
  #10  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,876

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,271 Times in 877 Posts
Originally Posted by gauvins
HillRider thanks for your input. This being said, I don't understand why that is going to be a problem. I mean, the 26T (I've actually swapped a 22T) is much lower than the FD's cage, yet it shifts very well. I (naively) thought that lowering the FD, perhaps with a wee bit of excess clearance WRT the larger chainring, would work well... funny as something that looks simple on the surface turns out to be difficult to implement
The FDER will jam against the middle ring if you lower it more than just a "bit". That's WHY the HUGE gap between the largest ring and cage.
The smallest ring is moot since you won't get past the middle.
The "slope" the FDER travels is going to remain the same no matter what you do to ring sizes.
IF it currently just clears the middle ring, how can it clear the middle ring if you lower it 4-6T more?
Bill Kapaun is offline