View Single Post
Old 07-17-21, 12:19 PM
  #1  
gurana
Tête de Limace
 
gurana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,578

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City; ~1987 Peugeot US Express; ~1985 Panasonic Sport 500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
tradition of the last TdF stage

As a sometimes watcher of the TdF I'm aware that traditionally the race is "decided" by the 20th stage, thought that one time it ended with a time trial may well be the only exception in the history of the event... it's the only one I've heard of anyways.

What struck me in the highlight coverage I've seen so far today is how definitive all the talk about the winner is. That's it. He won. End of story. This year isn't any different in that respect that what I've noticed in the past when I've followed coverage. I guess I'm a little curious as to the nature of this tradition. Is it because in most cases the margin is so wide by the time they're heading to Paris that it would kind of be asinine to make the leader chase down breakaways that contain riders close in time? If the time gap were closer (and the tour didn't end in a TT) would it be surprising if we saw someone try to make a play for it?

I'm also a little curious about the history of this tradition. Is it something that was there from the start? Or did it evolve over time in recognition that the leader's position is never really affected on the last stage, so why not just make it a kind of ceremonial kind of stage and all celebrate that we made it three weeks in one of the most brutal bike races in the world?
__________________
Les Douleurs de la Mort. :: Sed fugit interea fugit irreparabile tempus.
gurana is offline