View Single Post
Old 08-27-21, 08:33 AM
  #13  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,199

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3459 Post(s)
Liked 1,465 Times in 1,143 Posts
Originally Posted by azza_333
For tours I still plan to use tubed clinchers, I don't want to have to deal with the sealant mess on the chance the the tire pops of the bead during transport.
Tubeless rims have a tighter fitting shelf that the bead sits on, even if no sealant is used. That is something to be aware of before you start prying on it with a tire lever, even if you used tubes.

There was a long thread on tubeless on the rando board last fall and winter. Most of these riders are riding longer distances on bikes that are not heavily loaded, which I think mirrors your touring style. There might be some useful info there.
https://www.bikeforums.net/long-dist...oad-tires.html

I learned a lot from that thread and was surprised how many decided to give up on tubeless after trying it.

I have no plans to go tubeless, but I am rather unique in that I have several bikes that I ride during a season, thus I would have to do a lot more annual maintenance than most others if I went tubeless on half a dozen bikes. I average one puncture a year, I think it unlikely that I would get any benefit from tubeless. But I can see where someone that only rides one or maybe two bikes might reap some benefits from tubeless.
Tourist in MSN is offline