Originally Posted by MoAlpha

Interesting and, I guess, plausible, even if sugar is a surrogate for some other associated factor. I didn’t understand all of the statistics, but the analysis seems pretty sophisticated and the sample is fairly large.



Agree, not great, but I think the journals vary somewhat in quality and selectivity. At least the Ed Board of that journal seems to have legit experts on it. I think my name got on an MDPI paper or two over the years too, but I seem to be an unpaid content producer, editor, and promoter exclusively for the big “E” these days, and they have their issues too.