View Single Post
Old 10-04-22, 10:14 AM
  #5  
nenad
Junior Member
 
nenad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Fountain
The dropouts were my big question too. They had me thinking that perhaps your frame was manufactured in the early 90's? I'm a real fan of Colnago bikes from that general era as they were the bikes I dreamt of owning but I'm not that conversant with models I had no contact with. I have only ever seen one or two International or Super Sprint models in my life and I do appreciate that certain Colnago models had upgrades as time progressed. I can well imagine vertical rear dropouts being introduced somewhere along a model variant's lifespan. And, add to that, the general lack of ability to pin Colnago frames down to accurate build dates.

The other glaring build feature is the attachment process of brazing the seat stays to the seat cluster - no seat stay caps - a probable feature of a lower end frame?

All that being said, I think it's really very interesting and challenging to collect frames a little lower down on the quality scale. These are usually frames that receive little collector respect and general interest and initial owners don't really look after such bikes - they are probably much rarer. Even though the Internationals/Super Sprints weren't Colnago's top models, they were still quality frames and they probably have lovely ride qualities like all Colnago's do. I really like bikes (and components) a little down the 'pecking order'.

Would I re-paint this frame if it were mine? I'm probably thinking along the same track you are. It's really hard to remove a paint job that's in very good condition and I would initially leave it as it is at the moment. Knowing myself reasonably well, this paint job would play on my mind over time and I would find myself eventually burning it off (I love burning off paint finishes with a blow torch - clean and quick and I think it 'normalises' the frame tubes) and re-painting it - but only after a bit of research looking at Super Sprints and how they were initially presented - and also considering the complexity of the paint schemes used. (Disclaimer: I have the means to re-painting a bike frame - much cheaper than farming it out to a professional painter to re-finish. Something I neglect to take into account - $'s don't grow on trees.)

Often a re-painted bike will have remnants of an original paint finish on the steerer tups or perhaps in the bottom bracket shell. I wonder if your frame could reveal an original paint colour?
Let me share with you info on Super Sprint model and then we'll discuss it further.

Super Sprint supersedes International. It is an entry model. It has unique seatstay ends that curve inwards (I prefer the look of stays supporting seat post from the back as opposed to being on the side of it), slotted bottom bracket with guides, entry and exit brake cable guides on top of top tube, Columbus SL Cromor sticker, lack of clover on brake bridge as follows:







There is an earlier version of this frame that has rear brake external cable guide running atop of top tube:



Moving forward, starting in 1991 which you are familiar with, Super Sprint is superseded by Super '91. It looks almost the same as Super Sprint with 3 visible differences: brake cable guide entry is at the bottom of top tube, bottom bracket is full with screw on cable guide and it has a different Columbus/Colnago sticker (Super '91 sticker).





Colnago Super '91 is then superseded with Colnago C 94, 95, 96, 97 frames that use Columbus Thron Super tubing, have slightly different style of seatstays and come with clover on rear brake bridge, making them easier to differentiate.

So, by looking at all of the above, what I have is a Super Sprint whose last year of production would be 1990 otherwise it would have features of Super '91. I hope this explains the enigma behind the dropouts and 130 mm rear spacing: this is not a mid or late '90s frame, this is a late '80s or a 1990 frame at best. So now that we know all this, what is the story? Let me know what you think.

As for the repaint, my thinking is exactly as yours, and money is no object. This is a unique frame (dare I say one of) and deserves to be enjoyed as is.

Edit: on the topic of original paint, the BB is blue like the frame around it. The head tube looks like this:




There's no way to tell if that is original but if it is, the frame was white.

Last edited by nenad; 10-04-22 at 12:38 PM. Reason: to add further info
nenad is offline