View Single Post
Old 05-03-21, 08:31 PM
  #13  
joesch
Senior Member
 
joesch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,732

Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 601 Post(s)
Liked 779 Times in 497 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
The failure was not due to fatigue, as far as I can tell. Your pictures aren't great, but fatigue on something like this would show some amount of discoloring on the fracture surface. From what I can see, the fracture surface shows only evidence of rupture, i.e. the bolt was overtightened. Rupture surfaces are rough. Fatigue is smoother.

Most of these break due to careless mechanics at work.

I don't have the equipment to build aluminum frames, and I'm not sure I would do it if I did have the equipment. But on the occasions where I'm buying a bike, I buy aluminum frames if it's an option. Steel is a premium option nowadays, so the less expensive steel frames are more expensive than aluminum frames on what is otherwise the same bike. I prefer to pay less for a lighter aluminum frame.
Did not know that fatique "would show some amount of discoloring on the fracture surface".
Will surely be more careful now with tightening and max torque.
joesch is offline