What is the real truth about 27.5+?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: McCall Idaho
Posts: 302
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Salsa Fargo, TREK DS
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What is the real truth about 27.5+?
I already have too many bikes taking up space in the garage. I went to the "LBS" and asked about a bike that could be great for sand and road conditions and they recommended a 27.5+ bike. So what is the real truth? Can I ride on 2.75 or 3" tires on one day and swap wheels to 1.5" for a ride on the road?
#2
Senior Member
You could also get a 29.5+ bike that allows you to do the same thing.
If you want a 27.5 or a 29er and you also want to have a fat bike, now you can buy one bike and change tires with the seasons.
If you want a 27.5 or a 29er and you also want to have a fat bike, now you can buy one bike and change tires with the seasons.
#3
Senior Member
I already have too many bikes taking up space in the garage. I went to the "LBS" and asked about a bike that could be great for sand and road conditions and they recommended a 27.5+ bike. So what is the real truth? Can I ride on 2.75 or 3" tires on one day and swap wheels to 1.5" for a ride on the road?
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: McCall Idaho
Posts: 302
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Salsa Fargo, TREK DS
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I looked at the Salsa Fargo 27.5+ and the LBS said I could get 29" wheel set from Salsa. I called Salsa and the said I would need to have a bike shop make me a set and that I shouldn't go any skinnier than 2.25 on the new wheel set. That only gives me a range of 3"-2.25". I want to stay hardtail and have a back rack.
Still looking for the truth behind the rumor that the 27.5+ is a one bike for everything solution.
Still looking for the truth behind the rumor that the 27.5+ is a one bike for everything solution.
#6
Occam's Rotor
I was hoping I could swap the 27.5+ wheels for my 700c road bike (disc) wheels. The frame should allow it, according to their own description of the dropouts.
#8
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,524
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,411 Posts
#9
Senior Member
I'd get a set of 700c (aka 29r) wheels with the tires you want to run and put them next to the 27.5+ wheels with 3" tires. That will show you how big a difference there is -or isn't.
#10
Senior Member
I think the term you are looking for is 29er +. Wide rims 35-50 mm, and tires in the 2.8 to 3.25 width.
#11
Senior Member
The overall diameter should be similar. The issue is hub width. And diameter. 27.5 plus will be 110 x15 mm front and 12x148 rear for hubs. Most likely. Your new disk road? Not quite sure. 100 or 110 width x 12 mm for the front. Rear 135 or 142 x12?
#12
Occam's Rotor
My HED+ Belgium rims with 40mm Nanos are about 710mm (28 inch) in diameter.
Looks like all that is needed are "alternator reduction plates".
The Salsa Fargo 27.5+ website says:
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 09-18-19 at 04:24 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,074
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Liked 2,014 Times
in
972 Posts
BikeCalc.com - How to calculate Bicycle Wheel Size
You can decide how much you dare lower the bike. A 1" tire on 700c wheels would lower the BB by 1.25", quite a lot. You could get a light, supple, but relatively fat 44mm road tire like https://www.compasscycle.com/shop/co...oqualmie-pass/, which would have a diameter around 710mm, lowering the bike (from designed 27.5+ height) by 13mm or 1/2".
These differences in diameter are probably less than computed because the fatter tires would be used with less pressure.
#15
Senior Member
From my own reading, I suspect that bicycle tire companies decided to maximize their use of the most common sizes of tire-manufacturing equipment.
For the 406mm and 559mm sizes, you could already get on-road and off-road tires.
For 650b and 700c there was only on-road tires, but now they make off--road tires in those diameters as well.
The tire companies probably realized that they could utilize a production line more easily if they had the choice to produce either on-road or off-road tires on it, so they decided to produce off-road tires in the two larger/more-common diameters they had left that were only for "road" tires.
The rest is just marketing, most likely. Is there anything you could do with 27.5 or 29 that you could not have done in 26? Probably not.
Tire size is not considered to be a compelling argument among modern car or motorcycle designs.
It's just a chance for bike companies and bike shops to maybe sell a few more bikes that they might not have otherwise, as people decide they need to try the new thing.
,,,,,
On the other hand, 650c is almost abandoned entirely among triathlon (road) bikes.
For about 15 years if you were "serious" about riding triathlons, you bought a bike that had 650c wheels. But now, even Quintana Roo--probably the most-famous of triathlon bike brands, and the one who played a BIG part in starting the 650c triathlon bike fad--only offers their smallest size frame with 650c wheels. Everything else they sell has changed back to 700c now, and there's not a lot of tire choices left in 650c as tire companies have dropped most of their models in that size.
Quintana Roo used to have a list of reasons 650c was "better", way back then.
But that was then, this is now. And so this is why you need to buy a new bike.
Last edited by Doug5150; 04-24-17 at 12:41 PM. Reason: nuts
#16
Senior Member
I test rode a 27.5+ bike last summer and I liked it better than the 29ers I've ridden. The tires have that fat bike growl rolling down the trail and the sidewalls soak up the terrain. Good stuff.
I didn't want to like it over the 29er but it really won me over.
I didn't want to like it over the 29er but it really won me over.
#18
#19
Senior Member
I have a 29er with 29 x 2.25 tires and a 27.5+ bike with 27.5 x 3.0 tires (almost equal diameter to 29er).
My 29er I have to pick my lines riding single track. If I don't then the tires, more often than not, slide off the trail features which may or may not result in a dismount/crash. With my 27.5+ I just roll over obstacles and don't think about picking a line.
27.5+ is about better traction and roll over.
My 29er I have to pick my lines riding single track. If I don't then the tires, more often than not, slide off the trail features which may or may not result in a dismount/crash. With my 27.5+ I just roll over obstacles and don't think about picking a line.
27.5+ is about better traction and roll over.
Last edited by prj71; 04-26-17 at 05:36 AM.
#24
Senior Member
It's probably not, unless you own a bike shop and want to sell somebody another bike instead of just another set of tires.
From my own reading, I suspect that bicycle tire companies decided to maximize their use of the most common sizes of tire-manufacturing equipment.
For the 406mm and 559mm sizes, you could already get on-road and off-road tires.
For 650b and 700c there was only on-road tires, but now they make off--road tires in those diameters as well.
The tire companies probably realized that they could utilize a production line more easily if they had the choice to produce either on-road or off-road tires on it, so they decided to produce off-road tires in the two larger/more-common diameters they had left that were only for "road" tires.
The rest is just marketing, most likely. Is there anything you could do with 27.5 or 29 that you could not have done in 26? Probably not.
Tire size is not considered to be a compelling argument among modern car or motorcycle designs.
It's just a chance for bike companies and bike shops to maybe sell a few more bikes that they might not have otherwise, as people decide they need to try the new thing.
,,,,,
On the other hand, 650c is almost abandoned entirely among triathlon (road) bikes.
For about 15 years if you were "serious" about riding triathlons, you bought a bike that had 650c wheels. But now, even Quintana Roo--probably the most-famous of triathlon bike brands, and the one who played a BIG part in starting the 650c triathlon bike fad--only offers their smallest size frame with 650c wheels. Everything else they sell has changed back to 700c now, and there's not a lot of tire choices left in 650c as tire companies have dropped most of their models in that size.
Quintana Roo used to have a list of reasons 650c was "better", way back then.
But that was then, this is now. And so this is why you need to buy a new bike.
From my own reading, I suspect that bicycle tire companies decided to maximize their use of the most common sizes of tire-manufacturing equipment.
For the 406mm and 559mm sizes, you could already get on-road and off-road tires.
For 650b and 700c there was only on-road tires, but now they make off--road tires in those diameters as well.
The tire companies probably realized that they could utilize a production line more easily if they had the choice to produce either on-road or off-road tires on it, so they decided to produce off-road tires in the two larger/more-common diameters they had left that were only for "road" tires.
The rest is just marketing, most likely. Is there anything you could do with 27.5 or 29 that you could not have done in 26? Probably not.
Tire size is not considered to be a compelling argument among modern car or motorcycle designs.
It's just a chance for bike companies and bike shops to maybe sell a few more bikes that they might not have otherwise, as people decide they need to try the new thing.
,,,,,
On the other hand, 650c is almost abandoned entirely among triathlon (road) bikes.
For about 15 years if you were "serious" about riding triathlons, you bought a bike that had 650c wheels. But now, even Quintana Roo--probably the most-famous of triathlon bike brands, and the one who played a BIG part in starting the 650c triathlon bike fad--only offers their smallest size frame with 650c wheels. Everything else they sell has changed back to 700c now, and there's not a lot of tire choices left in 650c as tire companies have dropped most of their models in that size.
Quintana Roo used to have a list of reasons 650c was "better", way back then.
But that was then, this is now. And so this is why you need to buy a new bike.
But if you want to keep believing is all a marketing ploy, have at it.
#25
Senior Member
Only that if you knew anything, you'd know that lack of tire availability was the biggest block on the road for 29rs and fat bikes. And that 650b (what is now called 27.5) came about when Pacenti had their own rims rolled and tires made by Panaracer (if I recall correctly) and that, again, it took a while for tire makers to jump in.
But if you want to keep believing is all a marketing ploy, have at it.
But if you want to keep believing is all a marketing ploy, have at it.
27.5 MTB tires have been around for about ten years, but the 650b tire size has existed way way longer than that.
This page shows a 1952 bike that has them, and it wasn't the first. That means at least 65 years.
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2014/...se-randonneur/
There are sparse accounts of this size being in use around the beginning of the 19th century in Euro-land.
And likewise, 700c road bicycle tires have been around way way longer than MTB 29" as well.
It's difficult to pin down exact years (and it depends on what country you're talking of also) but they've been around for at least ~75 years.
Europe had clincher tires way before the US did, as in Europe they weren't forced into using tubular tires like people in the USA were:
AMERICAN SINGLE-TUBE TYRES | The Online Bicycle Museum
As for today--
the steps in bicycle tire manufacturing that are diameter-specific are based on the bead size, and modern tire companies already had the equipment on hand to produce 584mm and 622mm tires.
It's just that previously, they were only making narrow road tires in those bead sizes.