The low standard of lockdown pedestrianism
#26
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
They call them *multiuse* paths in my area. I’ve seen all kinds of uses from sitting in lawn chairs to laying on beach towels to all kinds of other stuff. I figure riding with headphones and earphones is one of those multi uses. I take it on myself to pass safely. And by gosh it seems to work. It does require the occasional slowing to a stop. I figure I can get plenty of fast riding on the road.
And I do this successfully…while wearing earbuds!
And I do this successfully…while wearing earbuds!
Gotta say, you actually don't necessarily know when you're causing a problem. I've only had earbuds on a cyclist endanger me and pedestrians once, and it was because he didn't hear me announce my pass, and suddenly swerved right in front of me. He was so close that I had to bail into the right lane, scaring the crap out of pedestrians with an uncomfortably close swerve between them ( they actually weren't in any danger, I made sure they knew what I was doing by announcing it, but I did scare them). Long story short, earbuds guy never looked behind him, and never even noticed the commotion.
And yeah, don't pull the "it's your fault for going too fast" crap or whatever, I was doing what would have been a perfectly reasonable pass, and obviously wasn't going too fast if I could actually bail on it without hitting anyone.
BTW, the pedestrians were yelling at me, then realized what had actually happened, and tried to yell at earbuds guy.
Likes For livedarklions:
#27
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
Moved here from General
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
Gotta say, you actually don't necessarily know when you're causing a problem. I've only had earbuds on a cyclist endanger me and pedestrians once, and it was because he didn't hear me announce my pass, and suddenly swerved right in front of me. He was so close that I had to bail into the right lane, scaring the crap out of pedestrians with an uncomfortably close swerve between them ( they actually weren't in any danger, I made sure they knew what I was doing by announcing it, but I did scare them). Long story short, earbuds guy never looked behind him, and never even noticed the commotion.
And yeah, don't pull the "it's your fault for going too fast" crap or whatever, I was doing what would have been a perfectly reasonable pass, and obviously wasn't going too fast if I could actually bail on it without hitting anyone.
BTW, the pedestrians were yelling at me, then realized what had actually happened, and tried to yell at earbuds guy.
And yeah, don't pull the "it's your fault for going too fast" crap or whatever, I was doing what would have been a perfectly reasonable pass, and obviously wasn't going too fast if I could actually bail on it without hitting anyone.
BTW, the pedestrians were yelling at me, then realized what had actually happened, and tried to yell at earbuds guy.
Any given speed that’s “perfectly reasonable” isn’t perfectly reasonable if it’s not safe because someone doesn’t hear you. Headphones, just zoned out or possibly deaf. I’ve finally just decided to expect the unexpected on the MUP. Honestly I have more problems with of leash dogs and children.
#29
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
I use one of these to ward Off Dogs.
Found they also work for Zoned out Walkers or Runners.
Shoreline Marine Air Horn | Academy
Found they also work for Zoned out Walkers or Runners.
Shoreline Marine Air Horn | Academy
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
Likes For 10 Wheels:
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,945
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3773 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
790 Posts
I feel very fortunate that I "grew up" riding the roads without cycling infrastructure. I've been on these MUPs and they are bad and that was way before the pandemic; I can only imagine a pandemic-filled MUP.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
I use one of these to ward Off Dogs.
Found they also work for Zoned out Walkers or Runners.
Shoreline Marine Air Horn | Academy
Found they also work for Zoned out Walkers or Runners.
Shoreline Marine Air Horn | Academy
This is the cycling equivalent to a "punishment pass" by a automobile.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
My philosophy, as a cyclist, is to learn to live with the realities of MUP, slow down, and not holler "Onyerleft!" every few minutes, expecting everyone else to "Git outta mah way!" just because I'm on wheels. That's the same selfish attitude that makes streets unsafe for cyclists.
But one thing does stand out.
"On your left" or "ding" is mostly an advisory not to do anything sudden.
It's not a request unless the recipient is doing something unreasonable like occupying the middle of the path or in a group spilling into the other lane.
The more it's routine and the more it's simply a reminder to tighten up to occupying only say 35-40 pecent percent of the entire bidirectional path's width, the smoother things are for everyone.
Experienced pedestrians in such a situation often just respond with a little half wave of their still lowered hand because there's nothing they actually need to do when they're already using the path correctly. More than a few will say thanks without turning their head to look.
I ride my MUP end to end, but I walk a mile of it more often than I go for a ride. The courtesy notification system works equally well for me in both roles.
Though I do find a vague but evidence-unjustified unease when walking, because I keep habitually darting my eyes to a helmet mirror that isn't there.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-18-21 at 08:46 AM.
Likes For UniChris:
#33
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I consider it MY responsibility to pass safely. Just yesterday morning I passed a large group of hikers on a short section of MUP. I guess they were practicing. I announced my pass and all but one heard me. He was wearing huge earphones. Which is his right. When he didn’t move after my second call I just slowed to a stop which is when I noticed the headphones. His two buddies pulled him over. I smiled and continued, life unaltered by the slow down.
Any given speed that’s “perfectly reasonable” isn’t perfectly reasonable if it’s not safe because someone doesn’t hear you. Headphones, just zoned out or possibly deaf. I’ve finally just decided to expect the unexpected on the MUP. Honestly I have more problems with of leash dogs and children.
Any given speed that’s “perfectly reasonable” isn’t perfectly reasonable if it’s not safe because someone doesn’t hear you. Headphones, just zoned out or possibly deaf. I’ve finally just decided to expect the unexpected on the MUP. Honestly I have more problems with of leash dogs and children.
I don't think it's a major problem either, that was one incident in literally thousands of miles, but he definitely a) caused the issue as he intentionally deafened himself, and b) did absolutely nothing to announce his pass of pedestrians before he swerved a few feet in front of me. I'm not getting what you're saying here about "reasonable speed". If I read you literally, I think you just said I can never safely pass someone wearing headphones. Screw that. I'm not riding the path stuck at the speed of the slowest person wearing headphones.
This guy's headphones were nearly invisible, btw. I had no indication whatsoever he didn't hear me until I saw the side of his head directly in my path. I fulfilled everything I could possibly have in order to make that pass safe, including successfully aborting the pass when Mr. Oblivious suddenly decided to ride erratically. Point is he never actually knew he had caused a near miss. Blocking out one of your senses can do that to a person.
#34
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Mostly in agreement, pedestrians are not obligated to step aside for cyclists and we shouldn't be asking them to.
But one thing does stand out.
"On your left" or "ding" is mostly an advisory not to do anything sudden.
It's not a request unless the recipient is doing something unreasonable like occupying the middle of the path or in a group spilling into the other lane.
The more it's routine and the more it's simply a reminder to tighten up to occupying only say 35-40 pecent percent of the entire bidirectional path's width, the smoother things are for everyone.
Experienced pedestrians in such a situation often just respond with a little half wave of their still lowered hand because there's nothing they actually need to do when they're already using the path correctly. More than a few will say thanks without turning their head to look.
I ride my MUP end to end, but I walk a mile of it more often than I go for a ride. The courtesy notification system works equally well for me in both roles.
Though I do find a vague but evidence-unjustified unease when walking, because I keep habitually darting my eyes to a helmet mirror that isn't there.
But one thing does stand out.
"On your left" or "ding" is mostly an advisory not to do anything sudden.
It's not a request unless the recipient is doing something unreasonable like occupying the middle of the path or in a group spilling into the other lane.
The more it's routine and the more it's simply a reminder to tighten up to occupying only say 35-40 pecent percent of the entire bidirectional path's width, the smoother things are for everyone.
Experienced pedestrians in such a situation often just respond with a little half wave of their still lowered hand because there's nothing they actually need to do when they're already using the path correctly. More than a few will say thanks without turning their head to look.
I ride my MUP end to end, but I walk a mile of it more often than I go for a ride. The courtesy notification system works equally well for me in both roles.
Though I do find a vague but evidence-unjustified unease when walking, because I keep habitually darting my eyes to a helmet mirror that isn't there.
I don't like it when someone yells a gruff "left" at me, but I'd rather they do that than ninja pass me. I announce as politely as I can, and I try to give them enough notice so they don't think I'm demanding they scramble. It's actually legally required where I ride, and sometimes the interaction is actually pleasant. I generally try to throw in a "good morning" or the like if I think they might think I'm being aggressive. I'm literally doing exactly what you say, I just don't want them to step to their left in front of me.
When people do stay or move to the right, a "thank you" as you pass is a nice gesture. I do that one a lot, especially when I see someone working to keep their dog out of my way.
And if all else fails, my brakes are really good.
Likes For homeless in ca.:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
I don't think it's a major problem either, that was one incident in literally thousands of miles, but he definitely a) caused the issue as he intentionally deafened himself, and b) did absolutely nothing to announce his pass of pedestrians before he swerved a few feet in front of me. I'm not getting what you're saying here about "reasonable speed". If I read you literally, I think you just said I can never safely pass someone wearing headphones. Screw that. I'm not riding the path stuck at the speed of the slowest person wearing headphones.
This guy's headphones were nearly invisible, btw. I had no indication whatsoever he didn't hear me until I saw the side of his head directly in my path. I fulfilled everything I could possibly have in order to make that pass safe, including successfully aborting the pass when Mr. Oblivious suddenly decided to ride erratically. Point is he never actually knew he had caused a near miss. Blocking out one of your senses can do that to a person.
This guy's headphones were nearly invisible, btw. I had no indication whatsoever he didn't hear me until I saw the side of his head directly in my path. I fulfilled everything I could possibly have in order to make that pass safe, including successfully aborting the pass when Mr. Oblivious suddenly decided to ride erratically. Point is he never actually knew he had caused a near miss. Blocking out one of your senses can do that to a person.
#37
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Yes. This one seems to be more serious. I live in one of the Local Government Areas that has been turned into a Do Not Leave zone. Centennial Park and Rookwood Cemetery, my two favourite places to ride hard in, are now apparently off-limits to me. I have to find out if the Do Not Leave injunction apples to exercise as well as for work.
First time I did get to ride some routes that I wouldn't have normally done. But for the most part the roads with interesting climbs and descents don't have a lot of traffic anyhow.
If our local MUP fills up, then I'll not worry, it's far too easy to go elsewhere from where I currently live. Indeed, my current location is right next to cycling routes for me and shopping and things for my wife that we scrapped plans to move back near family as we'd loose the conveniences we've gotten use to.
Do you have any idea what all the other stuff going on in this thread is about? <grin>
Likes For Iride01:
#38
Senior Member
But in Toronto, with the surge in bicycle ridership, you'd think there'd be a proportional increase in bicycle related injuries and fatalities. Nope, the number of fatalities stayed the same as in any normal year at four but the injury rate declined by about 76%.
#39
Senior Member
#40
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
If you're going to listen to music with headphones, YOU have an additional responsibility to deal with the fact that you are wilfully making it impossible for people to communicate with you.
If you're arguing that you wearing headphones imposes responsibility on people who aren't, it's a pretty small walk from that to "headphones should be banned." I don't support that because I think people who wear headphones can ride responsibly, but if you think it's other people's responsibility to protect you from the consequences of your choice to deafen yourself, I might need to reconsider that.
#41
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Same. When I'm walking or jogging I find myself glancing at my non-existent mirror. I'm considering putting one of my Take-A-Look mirrors on my sunglasses for that purpose. There are a couple of places on my usual jogging route where I can't walk/jog facing traffic from the shoulder, and the shoulders are either deteriorated or covered in rocks from washouts, so I have to walk in the rightmost traffic lane for about 50 yards. It's a very lightly traveled access road, but I'd still feel a bit better having that rear view mirror to watch the distracted drivers mesmerized by their phones clobber me from behind.
#42
Member
The bike paths that I'm about to give up on are teeming with oblivious nincompoops. They've been winkled out of their homes for "exercise" by Sydney's lockdown regulations that have recently become even more stringent. A large percentage of these people have obviously very little experience with being in the real world and many attempt to bring their safe little cyber world with them into the real world in the form of screens and earphones.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
We were both passing, so no, it can demonstrate that headphones guy failed to assess whether it was safe for HIM to pass. Basic rule is you never enter a lane until you have verified it was clear. He knows he can't hear, that obligates him to look behind before he starts his pass. By your formulation, it's always the fault of anyone who passes a guy wearing headphones.
If you're going to listen to music with headphones, YOU have an additional responsibility to deal with the fact that you are wilfully making it impossible for people to communicate with you.
If you're arguing that you wearing headphones imposes responsibility on people who aren't, it's a pretty small walk from that to "headphones should be banned." I don't support that because I think people who wear headphones can ride responsibly, but if you think it's other people's responsibility to protect you from the consequences of your choice to deafen yourself, I might need to reconsider that.
If you're going to listen to music with headphones, YOU have an additional responsibility to deal with the fact that you are wilfully making it impossible for people to communicate with you.
If you're arguing that you wearing headphones imposes responsibility on people who aren't, it's a pretty small walk from that to "headphones should be banned." I don't support that because I think people who wear headphones can ride responsibly, but if you think it's other people's responsibility to protect you from the consequences of your choice to deafen yourself, I might need to reconsider that.
I’ll continue to use extra caution while passing and slower speed in general while riding on MUPS. I hope that’s okay.
#44
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
It’s pretty simple. I feel it’s the responsibility of the person passing to pass safely. You feel differently. Great. I feel I can ride safely with earbuds. You don’t. Great. You aren’t going to change my mind and I’m not going to change yours.
I’ll continue to use extra caution while passing and slower speed in general while riding on MUPS. I hope that’s okay.
I’ll continue to use extra caution while passing and slower speed in general while riding on MUPS. I hope that’s okay.
Simple questions -- do you check behind you before you change lanes to pass? Do you announce your passes? If the answer to either of those is no, I don't agree you're exercising proper caution.
#45
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Bikes: nothing to brag about
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
116 Posts
Yeah, pedestrians are low standard, but not as bad as the bicyclist I had to follow down the street yesterday who was weaving through moving heavy traffic and running the lights while talking on the phone, checking his messages, riding no-hands and consequently weaving all over the road. At least he was more or less on the right side of the road most of the time and wasn't going against the traffic at night wearing black, no lights, as I see too often.
Bicyclists are worse than pedestrians because they have more equipment to abuse, faster, and this is why I avoid bike paths and bikers as much as possible
Bicyclists are worse than pedestrians because they have more equipment to abuse, faster, and this is why I avoid bike paths and bikers as much as possible
Likes For mdarnton:
#46
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Is there any reference to the method and data used for calculating and comparing Toronto's "injury rate" for various time periods?
#47
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times
in
828 Posts
Here the same MUPs are markedly different depending upon location. In some places, they are packed with other users. Two miles further, you have them almost to yourself. Much like riding on the road, it helps to stay on high guard and to try to be respectful of other users.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#49
Senior Member