Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

making my old Trek more comfy for 60 yr old me

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

making my old Trek more comfy for 60 yr old me

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-22, 02:09 PM
  #1  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
making my old Trek more comfy for 60 yr old me

I want to get back to bicycle touring, and the last long tour I did 8 years ago left my hands numb for several months. I had a shop install a raised angled stem, but I still get hand numbness fairly quickly. I'm losing weight and have about 30 lbs more to go, but someone suggested I try a Shockstop stem. Is it even possible to fit such a stem on my old steel bike? I think I need to get the handlebars several inches closer to the seat, also. Thanks for any advice!

Kelly
Gilroy CA
Galoot is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 02:51 PM
  #2  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
What kind of bike do you have? Hybrid or mountain bike(flat-straight handlebars) or road/touring bike with drop handlebars?

Have you moved your saddle back and forth horizontally to change your balance on the bike? (examples..saddle all the way forward on its rails puts much more weight on your hands, saddle all the way back on the rails decreases the weight on your hands.

What's the horizontal distance drop from the top of your saddle to the top of your handlebars? (place a yardstick on your saddle and have it run forward over your handlebars..what is the distance between the yardstick and the top of your handlebars?)

What size tires are you running and at what pressure?
fishboat is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 03:27 PM
  #3  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
'D'oh! I thought I had mentioned the bike but it completely slipped my mind Oldtimer's disease guess I have a Trek 520, from roughly 1982. Drop bars.

I'm very skeptical about your claim about seat position. A very experienced randonneur rider I work with who regularly does 300+ mile rides all in one go said exactly the opposite, that I need the equivalent of a shorter top tube. And that is obvious to me from riding a mountain bike or beach cruiser--when I am more upright I obviously have far less weight on my hands.

Last edited by Galoot; 05-29-22 at 03:32 PM.
Galoot is offline  
Likes For Galoot:
Old 05-29-22, 04:00 PM
  #4  
Crankycrank
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,668
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 836 Post(s)
Liked 1,060 Times in 744 Posts
Also consider thicker/cushier bar tape. I have the same problem at 63. 30 yrs ago I loved the old celo bar tape because it had no padding. Getting old sucks!
Crankycrank is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 04:04 PM
  #5  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,391
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1560 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times in 973 Posts
Originally Posted by Galoot
'D'oh! I thought I had mentioned the bike but it completely slipped my mind Oldtimer's disease guess I have a Trek 520, from roughly 1982. Drop bars.
Are the Ramps and hoods part of the bars set parallel to the ground or sloping down?
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 04:13 PM
  #6  
Mad Honk 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,947

Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso

Mentioned: 116 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,910 Times in 1,140 Posts
Back when I was fitting everyday I had a distance rider come in with the numb hand syndrome. About 20 miles and his hands would go numb. He had been sold a bike with a 100 mm stem and he was reaching to keep control and even moved the saddle forward, but the problem persisted. A change to an 85mm stem and a better fitting or saddle height, and distance and the problem went away. Check the dimensions for the bike compared to your size using the Italian bike fitting parameters. HTH, Smiles, MH

Last edited by Mad Honk; 05-29-22 at 04:54 PM.
Mad Honk is offline  
Likes For Mad Honk:
Old 05-29-22, 04:31 PM
  #7  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times in 2,301 Posts
Originally Posted by fishboat
What kind of bike do you have? Hybrid or mountain bike(flat-straight handlebars) or road/touring bike with drop handlebars?

Have you moved your saddle back and forth horizontally to change your balance on the bike? (examples..saddle all the way forward on its rails puts much more weight on your hands, saddle all the way back on the rails decreases the weight on your hands.

What's the horizontal distance drop from the top of your saddle to the top of your handlebars? (place a yardstick on your saddle and have it run forward over your handlebars..what is the distance between the yardstick and the top of your handlebars?)

What size tires are you running and at what pressure?
Not what some have found. Moving the seat rearwards changes the angle between your torso and thighs allowing more core muscles to better support your upper body. Or better said- a too far forward seat will not allow your core muscles to better support your upper body, thus your arms have to. We see this fitting "error" routinely, especially with smaller riders who tried the "free" adjustments (often suggested by the shop that sold the bike). Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 04:39 PM
  #8  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Crankycrank
Also consider thicker/cushier bar tape. I have the same problem at 63. 30 yrs ago I loved the old celo bar tape because it had no padding. Getting old sucks!
When I had the new stem installed the shop put padded bar tape. I kid you not, I have sections of pool noodles cut and put over the top flat part of the bars. That certainly helps but I don't want to always be on the top of the bars.
Galoot is offline  
Likes For Galoot:
Old 05-29-22, 04:42 PM
  #9  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Mad Honk
Back when I was fitting everyday I had a distance rider come in with the numb hand syndrome. About 20 miles and his hands would go numb. He had been sold a bike with a 100 mm stem and he was reaching to keep control and even moved the saddle forward, but the problem persisted. A change toan85mm stem and a better fitting or saddle height, and distance and the problem went away. Check the dimensions for the bike compared to your size using the Italian bike fitting parameters. HTH, Smiles, MH
OK, this makes sense to me. Though I have no idea what the "Italian bike fitting parameters" are and if they actually apply to 60 year old riders. I'll ask around at San Jose bicycle shops.

Nobody seems to know if the shock absorbing stem will fit on my bike...
Galoot is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 04:43 PM
  #10  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6191 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times in 3,316 Posts
Get some of those springy things or rubber ball that people squeeze on to strengthen their grip. I recently started getting a little bit of numbness near the end of a two hour ride and nothing had changed. I got to thinking that maybe I was just loosing muscle in my hands since I'm semi-retired and not doing as much with my hands anymore.

Actually seems to have helped. But it took about three weeks of daily use before I started to notice anything. And a recent 3.5 hour ride was no numbness.

Any of the other things mentioned are good things to try too.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 05-29-22, 04:50 PM
  #11  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
The shock absorbing stem requires the much newer kind of fork, etc. Unless major changes have been made, your Trek 520 came with a quill stem. You can get adaptors, but I am not sure that would solve your problem.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 05-29-22, 04:53 PM
  #12  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
You can however get a much taller but less horizontally extended quill stem, which would bring the bars further in.

e.g:



Slamming the saddle forward does put more weight on your arms/wrists. (I just did this on my wife's bike, and test rode it, and it was very clear. I need to undo the change before she gets anywhere near it.)
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 05-29-22, 04:55 PM
  #13  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
The shock absorbing stem requires the much newer kind of fork, etc. Unless major changes have been made, your Trek 520 came with a quill stem. You can get adaptors, but I am not sure that would solve your problem.
I already asked the company about adapters--and my suggestion was based on feedback from another 60+ rider who did the 3000 mile Southern Tier ride with no hand numbness.
Galoot is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 04:58 PM
  #14  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
The adapter looks like this:




You could then add a Redshift stopshock modern stem to that.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 05-29-22, 04:58 PM
  #15  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
Get some of those springy things or rubber ball that people squeeze on to strengthen their grip. I recently started getting a little bit of numbness near the end of a two hour ride and nothing had changed. I got to thinking that maybe I was just loosing muscle in my hands since I'm semi-retired and not doing as much with my hands anymore.

Actually seems to have helped. But it took about three weeks of daily use before I started to notice anything. And a recent 3.5 hour ride was no numbness.

Any of the other things mentioned are good things to try too.
That is just brilliant--and it fits with what my doctor told me, that men lose 10% of their muscle mass each decade after 40. So even my hands have gotten less muscular, and 8 years of gout have made that even worse. Squeezy ball it is!
Galoot is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:08 PM
  #16  
Galoot
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 238

Bikes: 1975 Coppi Campionissimo, 1980 Raleigh Grand Sport, 1983 Trek 520, 1983 Ciocc, 1995 Trek 520

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
You can however get a much taller but less horizontally extended quill stem, which would bring the bars further in.

e.g:



Slamming the saddle forward does put more weight on your arms/wrists. (I just did this on my wife's bike, and test rode it, and it was very clear. I need to undo the change before she gets anywhere near it.)
OK, this seems entirely contradictory. A shorter stem reduces the seat-to handlebar distance, and you say that is better for my hands. Moving the *seat* forward also reduces the seat-to-handlebar distance, but you say that is bad for my hands. Explain?
Galoot is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:09 PM
  #17  
t2p
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,074

Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1397 Post(s)
Liked 1,874 Times in 1,078 Posts
shorter and / or more upright stem might help

also :

try different gloves

change hand position more frequently


pedal harder / ride hills more - more force on your legs and then less on your hands / arms (lol)

(grin)
t2p is online now  
Old 05-29-22, 05:09 PM
  #18  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
Here is what the Redshift stem looks like. I got my wife the 30° one, so it puts the bars up higher and closer it. She is 61 and has a lot of wrist issues. I tried to take a picture of her bike but the photo was beyond useless.


Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 05-29-22, 05:11 PM
  #19  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
Originally Posted by Galoot
OK, this seems entirely contradictory. A shorter stem reduces the seat-to handlebar distance, and you say that is better for my hands. Moving the *seat* forward also reduces the seat-to-handlebar distance, but you say that is bad for my hands. Explain?
It isn't contradictory, but it is counter-intuitive. Just do the experiment. Slam the saddle forward, go for a ride, slam it all the way back, go for another ride. Compare.

I will add it took me by surprise.

Last edited by Polaris OBark; 05-29-22 at 05:20 PM.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 05-29-22, 05:28 PM
  #20  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by Galoot
'D'oh! I thought I had mentioned the bike but it completely slipped my mind Oldtimer's disease guess I have a Trek 520, from roughly 1982. Drop bars.

I'm very skeptical about your claim about seat position. A very experienced randonneur rider I work with who regularly does 300+ mile rides all in one go said exactly the opposite, that I need the equivalent of a shorter top tube. And that is obvious to me from riding a mountain bike or beach cruiser--when I am more upright I obviously have far less weight on my hands.
A shorter top tube and sliding the saddle back and forth on a longer top tube bike are two very different things.
fishboat is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:31 PM
  #21  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2238 Post(s)
Liked 3,429 Times in 1,793 Posts
It is a fairly subtle balance issue. If you sit far back, it de-weights the front.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:34 PM
  #22  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Not what some have found. Moving the seat rearwards changes the angle between your torso and thighs allowing more core muscles to better support your upper body. Or better said- a too far forward seat will not allow your core muscles to better support your upper body, thus your arms have to. We see this fitting "error" routinely, especially with smaller riders who tried the "free" adjustments (often suggested by the shop that sold the bike). Andy
Makes perfect sense. If you have appreciable core muscles. While my core muscles may have been appreciable 20-40 years ago..they are less so now. Now days I think of it more from a balancing weight perspective. The OP is 60..hard tellin' where's he's at.
fishboat is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:38 PM
  #23  
Blues
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Cabarrus County, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 33

Bikes: Some vintage and all projects. Geezer road, road, cruise, some gravel, not much mountain.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Galoot, I've been dealing with your same issues. My best solution is bigger tires with less air and a shorter distance from my sit bones to my bar grips. The 1977 Nishiki International in the photo has a tall and short reach [I think 40 mm] stem. That gets my back and arm angles to about 45 degrees from level. It has Conti. Ultra Sport 1-1/4" tires with tubes and I run them at 38# in the front and 58# in the rear carrying 215# total. They give me a relative vibration free ride on my chip-seal roads. I do not have pot holes where I normally ride so I get by with the low pressures. I have also discovered that utilizing my core more takes weight off my hands which helps also. I seldom get into the drops and haven't taped them up.



I also have 1982 Shogan single speed steel bike with the thread-less stem converter and Redshift Kitchen Sink bars. They give a little more height and back sweep. I Installed ReneHerseCycles.com Snoqualmie Pass extra lignt 700cx44mm w/ Conti Cross Tubes 32/47-622 which I run at 30# front and 40# rear.


This bike gives a very smooth ride. No vibration means happy wrists.
Blues is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 05:58 PM
  #24  
brianmcg123
Senior Member
 
brianmcg123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 1,286

Bikes: 2013 Trek Madone; 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Galoot
OK, this seems entirely contradictory. A shorter stem reduces the seat-to handlebar distance, and you say that is better for my hands. Moving the *seat* forward also reduces the seat-to-handlebar distance, but you say that is bad for my hands. Explain?
Moving the seat forward is bad for your knees also. You want the knee/pedal relationship to be correct, then bring the bars to you.

By just moving the seat forward you change how your legs pedal, and you also pitch your weight forward putting more weight on the hands.
brianmcg123 is offline  
Old 05-29-22, 06:36 PM
  #25  
greatbasin
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 66 Posts
I have used a Red Shift shock stop stem. Velo-Orange is just one parts seller that stocks an adapter so it will fit on an old quill-type stem.

I know someone else already posted another similar adapter. The 30 degree Redshift stem will raise the bars and it will provide an effectively short-length stem. Don't get horizontal stem-length confused with stem height. More stem height will raise your bars and result in a more upright position and less weight on the hands. The ideal stem-length will depend on your top-tube length and your torso and arm length.

From my experience with the Red Shift stem, I have to say it definitely made a difference, but why is important and not so clear. Without the stem, I'd get numb hands within an hour. With the stem, I could tour for 12 hours and still not have any pain. However, I believe it was the stem height that made most of the difference, It raised my bars an inch and half, from 2.5" under the seat height to 1" under the seat height. I don't give so much credit to the shock-stop feature, but I can't say for sure since I haven't tested my hypothesis with a similarly tall stem without that feature.

Does your Trek 520 have 27 inch wheels or 700C? When did Trek change to 700's? I think it wasn't until 1986. What tires are you using? Fatter tires at a lower pressure would almost certainly provide more damping than the shock stop stem. You could certainly have both, but the Red Shift stem is somewhat pricey for what it is. If you're willing to spend several hundred dollars to upgrade the Trek 520, you could get the Red Shift Stem, but I'd be sure you also had suitable wheels and tires for the maximum damping. You may be better off changing to a more modern steel frameset where you could fit fat tires, the Red Shift stem without an adapter, and have a taller head tube.

Also, consider ditching the drop bars and getting some swept-back bars. My bike had "North Road" style bars for years, but I dared to try drop bars on a new-to-me bike for a tour back in April. With that Red Shift stem that I mentioned, I had no pain, but I didn't appreciate the leaned-way-forward riding position even when using the top of the bar or the hoods. I've since outfitted a more suitable touring bike with Albatross style bars. I don't have them especially high. They're about seat-height. We'll see how they do on the next tour. I could use a higher stem if I wanted to be bolt upright, but I might lose a significant amount of pedaling power in that position.

Especially if you keep the drop bars, be sure to sit in a position that minimizes the arching of the back and weight on the hands. Rotate the top of your pelvis forward. Push the bottom of your butt back and as you lean forward, make your lower back concave. You should be able to reach forward to the bars and "play the piano." If you can't reach the bars without needing to lean on them to hold you up, your seating position is wrong.
greatbasin is offline  
Likes For greatbasin:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.