Wahoo vs Strava
01-25-23, 07:34 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Nevada County, California
Posts: 788
Bikes: Subject to change at any given moment but currently is...... Colnago Mapei, Colnago C40, Wilier Triestina Carbon, Wilier Triestina Ramato, Follis 472, Peugeot PX60, Razesa, Orbea Terra, Soma Pescadero and 1/2 owner of a Santana tandem.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
264 Posts
Wahoo vs Strava
I’ve noticed there is usually a slight discrepancy between the two at the conclusion of my rides. I have a favorite hill I enjoy flying down and today Wahoo said I hit 43.2 while Strava said 44.9.
Is one more accurate than the other?
Is one more accurate than the other?
01-26-23, 09:21 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,886
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 1,919 Times
in
1,203 Posts
As Mark Twain said about watches, “A man with one watch knows what time it is; a man with two is never sure.”
Personally, I believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) GPS, with post-processed GPS data a distant third. Of course Strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
Personally, I believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) GPS, with post-processed GPS data a distant third. Of course Strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
Likes For pdlamb:
01-26-23, 09:33 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,439
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4217 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times
in
1,800 Posts
as mark twain said about watches, “a man with one watch knows what time it is; a man with two is never sure.”
personally, i believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) gps, with post-processed gps data a distant third. Of course strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
personally, i believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) gps, with post-processed gps data a distant third. Of course strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
01-26-23, 10:21 AM
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,929
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6163 Post(s)
Liked 4,779 Times
in
3,297 Posts
Wahoo? The device itself or some site of theirs you load your ride to?
Different places might derive the numbers differently. If you tell me you hit 44.9 mph, I'm not going to care if it was only 43.2 mph. All I'm going to do is think that you went downhill fast.
Different places might derive the numbers differently. If you tell me you hit 44.9 mph, I'm not going to care if it was only 43.2 mph. All I'm going to do is think that you went downhill fast.
Likes For Iride01:
01-26-23, 10:30 AM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Nevada County, California
Posts: 788
Bikes: Subject to change at any given moment but currently is...... Colnago Mapei, Colnago C40, Wilier Triestina Carbon, Wilier Triestina Ramato, Follis 472, Peugeot PX60, Razesa, Orbea Terra, Soma Pescadero and 1/2 owner of a Santana tandem.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
264 Posts
It was my ELEMNT that recorded the 43.2, the connected Strava gave the higher number after processing the data from the Wahoo device.
01-26-23, 10:57 AM
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,929
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6163 Post(s)
Liked 4,779 Times
in
3,297 Posts
If you are certain that your Wahoo is giving you the correct total distance for all your rides, then I'd probably go with the Wahoo if you have to feel honest when you get to telling tales of the great ride with your bud's. You aren't a fisherman are you? At least not a fisherman that tells tales. <grin>
Remember that your log file doesn't contain every moment of your ride. At best it might have 1 second intervals. But even 1 second recording is missing over 58 feet of your actual path at 40 mph. So differences from what the Device that is getting multiple data points to read in that one second of time to Strava and others that are limited to data sets further apart can be different. And if one or several of the plots in the log file was suffering accuracy problems due to satellite reception issue of any sort, then that might play a role in the difference too.
Remember that your log file doesn't contain every moment of your ride. At best it might have 1 second intervals. But even 1 second recording is missing over 58 feet of your actual path at 40 mph. So differences from what the Device that is getting multiple data points to read in that one second of time to Strava and others that are limited to data sets further apart can be different. And if one or several of the plots in the log file was suffering accuracy problems due to satellite reception issue of any sort, then that might play a role in the difference too.
01-26-23, 10:58 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,439
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4217 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times
in
1,800 Posts
I'd tend to trust the device that was actually there rather than the software that calculated speed based on GPS positioning estimated elevation (to account for distance changes that don't happen in (X,Y) space that the GPS won't pick up). On the other hand, unless you have a connected, calibrated, wheelspeed sensor, all your Elemnt is doing is tracking GPS changes and applying them to estimated elevation as well. Just a different algorithm and different estimates.
Last edited by himespau; 01-26-23 at 04:17 PM.
01-26-23, 03:47 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,341
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,934 Times
in
1,898 Posts
being honest; if you can find a radar service car (traffic enforcement) , ask them to beam you as you're recording on your device(s). it would be about as legally accurate as you might get for cheap. Mine was verified by the LEO. Bicycle mounted computer was a tad more accurate than the phone app.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
01-29-23, 06:33 AM
#9
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,451
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10951 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,112 Posts
As Mark Twain said about watches, “A man with one watch knows what time it is; a man with two is never sure.”
Personally, I believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) GPS, with post-processed GPS data a distant third. Of course Strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
Personally, I believe a cheap speedometer first, followed by the (processed data) GPS, with post-processed GPS data a distant third. Of course Strava gave you a mile and a half per hour better answer, so which do you want to believe?
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
01-29-23, 07:35 PM
#10
Newbie
Related to the subject matter, I noticed my new Garmin 1040 is reporting higher top speeds than my previous 530. The new 1040 model is supposed to be more accurate since it uses multi-band gps.
02-04-23, 01:02 AM
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
188 Posts
You didn't mention how your speed is measured. Speed sensor or GPS. GPS is not as good for instantaneous speed calculations. There's the potential for all sorts of unknown processing. Obviously if Strava is getting the data from the Wahoo, and they were both simply looking at the single highest value of speed, they should both report the same value. But it's possible that one or both are doing some processing of the data. More than likely some form of data smoothing (filtering) and they just do it differently.
Maybe the Wahoo is computing the highest N second average speed while Strava is reporting the single highest speed value. Both can be correct, it's just a matter of the definition of what max speed is for their respective methods of calculation.
If having the most accurate speed values are important to you, then get a speed sensor if you don't have one. My Garmin 530 can auto calibrate this using GPS data. I'm sure many other bike computers do was well. GPS is great over longer distances, so this calibration can work well. But the speed sensor will be much better than GPS for things like peak instantaneous speed.
Maybe the Wahoo is computing the highest N second average speed while Strava is reporting the single highest speed value. Both can be correct, it's just a matter of the definition of what max speed is for their respective methods of calculation.
If having the most accurate speed values are important to you, then get a speed sensor if you don't have one. My Garmin 530 can auto calibrate this using GPS data. I'm sure many other bike computers do was well. GPS is great over longer distances, so this calibration can work well. But the speed sensor will be much better than GPS for things like peak instantaneous speed.
