I own one carbon bike.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I own one carbon bike.
I never ride it. It just feels dead to me, no feed back, it doesn't talk like steel. I don't know, what do you guys think?
#2
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
I have two steel bikes and two carbon fiber. I like 'em all equally. And I don't find any significant differences between 'em. Maybe I'm not strong enough or skilled enough to take full advantage of the carbon bikes. And we don't have any mountains here, just lots of rollers with some short, steep hillettes, but no prolonged climbing. So the lighter weight isn't really a factor.
The carbon bike bottom brackets feel a bit stiffer and more responsive. But it doesn't translate to consistently faster speeds on my familiar routes. My fastest times on the same segments I've ridden hundreds of times are split evenly between the steel and carbon bikes. My times/speeds depend more on the engine, weather and wind.
If I had to choose one I'd keep the '89 Centurion Ironman. It just feels right, even if the differences feel minor. But I'd probably update the downtube shifters to integrated brakes/shifters for convenience. Those are handy on the carbon bikes.
The carbon bike bottom brackets feel a bit stiffer and more responsive. But it doesn't translate to consistently faster speeds on my familiar routes. My fastest times on the same segments I've ridden hundreds of times are split evenly between the steel and carbon bikes. My times/speeds depend more on the engine, weather and wind.
If I had to choose one I'd keep the '89 Centurion Ironman. It just feels right, even if the differences feel minor. But I'd probably update the downtube shifters to integrated brakes/shifters for convenience. Those are handy on the carbon bikes.
#3
Senior Member
Of the 14 bikes I own, 1 is carbon. I like the carbon bike just fine. At 16 pounds my old legs appreciate it when hill climbing. It is supposedly one of the best carbon bikes ever made so maybe that helps.
Last edited by rjhammett; 07-13-21 at 10:11 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the reply bro. I don't fail to recognize the technological advancements on the carbon bikes. Technology is the future, no doubt about it. I just really like those steel machines man. The road feedback, the little flex under acceleration, and why not, at this point it is also the exclusivity of riding such a bike at a time when everybody thinks they need an expensive new bike to enjoy the sport.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,788
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,019 Times
in
719 Posts
I've got a single carbon bike, while I like it and enjoy the ride I find it less then ideal. It was built using parts from a previous build and I'm no longer the person who found a 53/39 175mm crank to be the right fit. I'd much prefer a 50/34 or even 48/34 with 170mm crank. OTOH, my steel bike was built fully modern with every feature I wanted and while it is 6lb heavier, its geared the way I like.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#6
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
Well if this isn't the most tee'd-up / set up / 'clickbait'-type statement for a bunch of steel-philes I've ever seen, ya know? What carbon bike do you have? What's the wheelset, tires, and components? What sort of riding do you like to do vs. what this bike is made for? What do you want out of a bike vs. what does the carbon bike deliver? So much context missing here.
Steel, like any metal used for bikes, has a springiness and a response inherent to itself. Carbon, while very light and very stiff (per weight), is a natural vibration damper. Using its inherent strengths, it's a fantastic material. Yes, I have used the same exact components, down to the wheels and tires, on a fully carbon frameset (~2010 Ridley Damocles Pozatto Edition with integrated seatpost) and immediately after, a 1987 Schwinn Prologue (Tange Prestige), and the Prologue would get up the same hill a little better (out of the saddle only, here) due to the inherent steel springiness. The Damocles didn't sap any energy (a good thing, and 'as good' as carbon can do in that regard, IMO) from my climbing efforts, but it didn't give me anything either.
Since I am a mortal man, some springback is greatly appreciated in out-of-saddle efforts. I very much appreciate carbon in a seatpost and handlebar application where it mutes the vibrations of the road. Shimano's Dura-Ace WH-7850 (and later C24 in WH-9000 form) wheelsets, which were a slim aluminum rim substrate overlayed with carbon (1400g for the set, no rider weight limit), are phenomenal wheels! A perfect balance of vibration damping (carbon) and lunging springiness (aluminum) in a shallower box-section rim profile.
I've had a 2008 Felt F5 carbon road bike, but that was 7-8 years ago and I am even more able to read a bike's mannerisms now vs. then. I'd like to try a 2008+ Trek Madone or equivalent Specialized carbon bike as both come in super tall sizes and are well-liked (for what that is worth). In the mean time, I'll keep with my steel bikes that already fit me, allow for large (supple and light!) tires to be employed, cost less, and take me over junky Seattle streets with ease, all while not sacrificing springiness/playfulness that I look for in a bike. And yes, I do have a carbon seatpost and handlebars on it. They work!
Steel, like any metal used for bikes, has a springiness and a response inherent to itself. Carbon, while very light and very stiff (per weight), is a natural vibration damper. Using its inherent strengths, it's a fantastic material. Yes, I have used the same exact components, down to the wheels and tires, on a fully carbon frameset (~2010 Ridley Damocles Pozatto Edition with integrated seatpost) and immediately after, a 1987 Schwinn Prologue (Tange Prestige), and the Prologue would get up the same hill a little better (out of the saddle only, here) due to the inherent steel springiness. The Damocles didn't sap any energy (a good thing, and 'as good' as carbon can do in that regard, IMO) from my climbing efforts, but it didn't give me anything either.
Since I am a mortal man, some springback is greatly appreciated in out-of-saddle efforts. I very much appreciate carbon in a seatpost and handlebar application where it mutes the vibrations of the road. Shimano's Dura-Ace WH-7850 (and later C24 in WH-9000 form) wheelsets, which were a slim aluminum rim substrate overlayed with carbon (1400g for the set, no rider weight limit), are phenomenal wheels! A perfect balance of vibration damping (carbon) and lunging springiness (aluminum) in a shallower box-section rim profile.
I've had a 2008 Felt F5 carbon road bike, but that was 7-8 years ago and I am even more able to read a bike's mannerisms now vs. then. I'd like to try a 2008+ Trek Madone or equivalent Specialized carbon bike as both come in super tall sizes and are well-liked (for what that is worth). In the mean time, I'll keep with my steel bikes that already fit me, allow for large (supple and light!) tires to be employed, cost less, and take me over junky Seattle streets with ease, all while not sacrificing springiness/playfulness that I look for in a bike. And yes, I do have a carbon seatpost and handlebars on it. They work!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
I have a '17 Diamondback Podium. It has a high end frameset, wind tunnel designed aero high mod carbon. Same frame their World Tour team they sponsored rode. I wanted something all modern and up to date and I had never even ridden a carbon bike.
The bike weighs nothing and it rides smoother than any steel bike I ever had. You can even flex the seat stays by hand, they're like mini shock absorbers. The first time I rode it I had to pull over and make sure I didn't lose air pressure.
Being honest with myself I have to admit it's the best bike I ever owned. But there's just something about it I don't like that I can't even put my finger on. A love/hate relationship. I'll go months without riding it, then I'll take it out and think "damn this is the ultimate bike". Then it will sit for a couple of more months. I'm trying to debate if I should have a tubular wheelset built for it which would really make it perfect for me or just put it up for sale while I can still get a decent amount of money for it.
The bike weighs nothing and it rides smoother than any steel bike I ever had. You can even flex the seat stays by hand, they're like mini shock absorbers. The first time I rode it I had to pull over and make sure I didn't lose air pressure.
Being honest with myself I have to admit it's the best bike I ever owned. But there's just something about it I don't like that I can't even put my finger on. A love/hate relationship. I'll go months without riding it, then I'll take it out and think "damn this is the ultimate bike". Then it will sit for a couple of more months. I'm trying to debate if I should have a tubular wheelset built for it which would really make it perfect for me or just put it up for sale while I can still get a decent amount of money for it.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times
in
2,602 Posts
I’ve ridden many steel bikes that felt dead.
#9
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
I have a '17 Diamondback Podium. It has a high end frameset, wind tunnel designed aero high mod carbon. Same frame their World Tour team they sponsored rode. I wanted something all modern and up to date and I had never even ridden a carbon bike.
The bike weighs nothing and it rides smoother than any steel bike I ever had. You can even flex the seat stays by hand, they're like mini shock absorbers. The first time I rode it I had to pull over and make sure I didn't lose air pressure.
Being honest with myself I have to admit it's the best bike I ever owned. But there's just something about it I don't like that I can't even put my finger on. A love/hate relationship. I'll go months without riding it, then I'll take it out and think "damn this is the ultimate bike". Then it will sit for a couple of more months. I'm trying to debate if I should have a tubular wheelset built for it which would really make it perfect for me or just put it up for sale while I can still get a decent amount of money for it.
The bike weighs nothing and it rides smoother than any steel bike I ever had. You can even flex the seat stays by hand, they're like mini shock absorbers. The first time I rode it I had to pull over and make sure I didn't lose air pressure.
Being honest with myself I have to admit it's the best bike I ever owned. But there's just something about it I don't like that I can't even put my finger on. A love/hate relationship. I'll go months without riding it, then I'll take it out and think "damn this is the ultimate bike". Then it will sit for a couple of more months. I'm trying to debate if I should have a tubular wheelset built for it which would really make it perfect for me or just put it up for sale while I can still get a decent amount of money for it.
I enjoy riding it. I just can't figure out why it doesn't grab me the same way my '89 Ironman and '93 Trek 5900 do.
Part of it is the frame geometry and my own setup. It's just enough different from the other bikes that I'm constantly fiddling with the bike fit. Top tube is a little shorter; head tube a little longer; etc. A few days ago I raised the seat post about 1/2", and swapped saddles. So now it feels a bit more natural.
I'm thinking about converting it to a TT/tri-bike, since I have the components from an early 2000s Trek TT bike with cracked frame.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,656
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,938 Times
in
1,763 Posts
Well I was out yesterday on my one carbon bike. I absolutely love it. The feel is different but there is no doubt that it needs to go fast! Quite comfortable too.
Yesterday was the 8th straight day of 40-60 miles a day without a rest day. This bike carried me for another comfortable and pretty effortless 50 miles.
The "dead" feeling bike I'm dealing with is a Klein Quantum II, it's really fast but feels like a bit of a dog under me. Still trying to sort that out.
Yesterday was the 8th straight day of 40-60 miles a day without a rest day. This bike carried me for another comfortable and pretty effortless 50 miles.
The "dead" feeling bike I'm dealing with is a Klein Quantum II, it's really fast but feels like a bit of a dog under me. Still trying to sort that out.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,732
Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Liked 778 Times
in
496 Posts
What carbon bike do you own and not like riding ??
I like diff frame materials and styles of bikes, especially road including SS and gravel rides.
My ride choice often depends on my mood and energy level which will also lead to my route choice.
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 308
Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.7C, Shogun Metro AT, Jamis Durango SX, Miyata Alumicross, Fuji Special Road Racer, Mongoose ATB, Fuji SST 1.0 Team, Gitane (?), Specialized Rockhopper SS, Univega Gran Turismo, Univega Supra Sport Mixte, Nishiki Tri-A, Diamondback Coil
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
78 Posts
I built up a 2009 Fuji SST a few years ago, and I love it. Full carbon fork, aero mast-style seatpost, 53/39 10s, won't fit anything bigger than 23c. It's a crazy beast, but I consciously think about how much I love it every time I'm on it. Not sure if I even compare it to my other bikes, which include older and newer steel and aluminum. It's just wild, N+1 at its best! I will say there seems to be a conventional wisdom, particularly in gravel, C&V, and MTB'ing that overall weight really isn't that important, but I think it 100% is, and I say that as someone who has this Fuji, which weighs in at around 19lbs without even trying at all, but also as someone who has a few porkers in the 30+ range, and more reasonable riders in the 22-28 lb range. Obviously there's the climbing, but I think in general over the course of longer rides you really come to appreciate the lack of weight underneath you. Feels like less of a slog at the end, I guess.
Fuji SST by Eat More Plants1, on Flickr
Fuji SST by Eat More Plants1, on Flickr
Likes For PugRider:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times
in
2,602 Posts
My folk theory about bike weight is in terms of ranges. More than 30#, all kinda feels the same to me (heavy but stable). Between 30 and 25#, I really can’t tell the difference between them, though they certainly are more agile than the heavy ones. Less than 25# is best, usually quite a difference in climbing. My favorite riders are all around 20-22#. I’ve had a few sub 20# bikes, including a Ti bike, and that one felt quite dead. So it’s not just the weight or the material, but geometry, wheels, other components, my fitness level, etc.
Likes For nlerner:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,675
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
405 Posts
I think I might be or at least like to think I might be in RiddleOfSteel's camp on this interesting subject. That said, I posted this over on the +50 forum, 65-85+ thread when we were asked why so many steel bike showed up on the "What do old people ride...?" and he asked seemingly incredulously are these everyday rides and why would you do that when carbon is so much better. I think it plays a part in this thread as well at least for me:
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
Last edited by easyupbug; 07-11-21 at 09:08 AM.
Likes For easyupbug:
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 308
Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.7C, Shogun Metro AT, Jamis Durango SX, Miyata Alumicross, Fuji Special Road Racer, Mongoose ATB, Fuji SST 1.0 Team, Gitane (?), Specialized Rockhopper SS, Univega Gran Turismo, Univega Supra Sport Mixte, Nishiki Tri-A, Diamondback Coil
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
78 Posts
I think I might be or at least like to think I might be in RiddleOfSteel's camp on this interesting subject. That said, I posted this over on the +50 forum, 65-85+ thread when we were asked why so many steel bike showed up on the "What do old people ride...?" and he asked seemingly incredulously are these everyday rides and why would you do that when carbon is so much better. I think it plays a part in this at least for me:
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
I will say I just restored (no pics yet I can't believe it!) an 85 Nishiki Tri-A, which is a kinda wild bike in its own right (internal cabling for downtube shifters!), and that Tange 1 tubing (which I initially fell in love with on my Centurion Ironman) is just delightfully lively.
Last edited by PugRider; 07-11-21 at 08:54 AM. Reason: typo
#18
Senior Member
I have one carbon rocket, but I look at it like a piece of exercise equipment. I ride it hard and fast then put it up. But my vintage bikes are a joy to ride that puts a smile on my face every time. I take better care of the vintage steel bikes than I do the carbon bike. I think part of the joy of vintage bikes is riding such a great bike knowing you paid less for the bike than you did the tires on the carbon bike.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#19
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
I think I might be or at least like to think I might be in RiddleOfSteel's camp on this interesting subject. That said, I posted this over on the +50 forum, 65-85+ thread when we were asked why so many steel bike showed up on the "What do old people ride...?" and he asked seemingly incredulously are these everyday rides and why would you do that when carbon is so much better. I think it plays a part in this thread as well at least for me:
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
I religiously rotate through my collection; everyone of my bikes was hand-crafted by artisans with things like carefully brazed and tapered lugs, many thinned by craftsmen and craftswomen with files. This attention to detail and esthetics was paid to every stage of the build. I greatly value the components ease of repair and lack of planned obsolescence now present in the cycling industry. So when you say "better to ride" it is based on your set of well understood facts and personal beliefs, but for me "better" is influenced by my personal beliefs. Starting with a Trek 5500 in 1998 (still hanging up in the shop) I bought a new WIzzbang bike every few years only to let it go after a couple of years then stopped after four such bikes.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#20
Senior Member
I wonder how much the mind has to do with expectations etc. "It's a 40 year old piece of steel and collectible and nostalgic and fun --- it's awesome." "It's an expensive, new technology, with carbon -- I expect more."
Most have decided what a Cannondale feels like before ever riding one. I reference back to a review article posted here of the numbered aluminum Schwinn bikes (434 etc) where the reviewer said it ate up vibrations better than his steel bikes. Not gonna discount what any one person truly feels when on steel, aluminum or carbon, but the mind is a powerful thing and works in many different ways
Most have decided what a Cannondale feels like before ever riding one. I reference back to a review article posted here of the numbered aluminum Schwinn bikes (434 etc) where the reviewer said it ate up vibrations better than his steel bikes. Not gonna discount what any one person truly feels when on steel, aluminum or carbon, but the mind is a powerful thing and works in many different ways
Likes For sdn40:
#21
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,844
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,048 Times
in
1,253 Posts
In my experience, that's how it happens.
Likes For clubman:
#22
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Warning: Long anecdote ahead, but still relevant to the issue of how bikes "feel," which might not be a factor of steel vs aluminum vs carbon fiber, etc.
Over a few years of experimenting with tires and tubes, I've realized the "feel" we sometimes attribute to the bike is more a factor of the rubber on the wheels.
Ditto all the contact points: saddle, handlebar, bar wrap, crank length, pedals, shoes, etc.
I started out with the cheap tires and tubes the bikes came with but eventually wondered whether better tires really would feel and ride better. Yeah, they do.
For the past year I've mostly used the Ironman with Soma Supple Vitesse SL in 700x23, with butyl tubes because my latex tubes were sized for 700x25 and larger tires and wouldn't quite fit without a risk of pinching. But the ride was terrific with those Soma tires, and of course the Ironman already has a nice steel bike feel.
The carbon fiber road bikes shared a wheelset with Continental GP Classic skinwalls, which ride nearly as well as the Soma but are better suited to bad roads -- more puncture resistant, longer wearing, without sacrificing a great ride feel. Those tires are 700x25 only. For the past year I've ridden those with Silca latex tubes. Fantastic ride feel, especially on the coarse chipseal that's becoming the new-normal in my area -- they aren't doing smooth blacktop anymore. It's all the equivalent to a gravel road with epoxy gluing the gravel together.
Latex tubes are a little more delicate than butyl but not as delicate as I'd expected. Until this week my only flat was a puncture on the rim-facing part of the tube, not a puncture through the tire from road debris. My fault. I ignored Silca's recommendation to use tubeless rim tape. Instead I just used the old Velox cloth tape that was already in the rims. Apparently there was a tiny shard of metal or bit of wire embedded in the rim tape that nicked the latex tube. Fortunately I was able to patch it with a self-adhesive Lezyne patch, which has held for the past year. So despite some claims that latex tubes can't be patched, it appears they can be patched with *some* types of patches.
I switched to some plastic rim strips that are fairly stiff and inflexible -- it looks like the stuff Schwalbe and others sell as a substitute for cloth or those useless rubber band rim strips that come with most cheap wheelsets. That seemed to be fine for about a year.
But a few days ago when I inflated the tire (latex tubes need to be topped up every day), the pressure of trying to mash the floor pump's chuck onto the valve pushed the valve into the wheel and I heard a pop, followed by immediate deflation. When I took out the tube it appeared as if the latex had extruded into a gap between the rim strip and valve hole in the rim. It might be repairable, I dunno. I'll check with Vittoria, the maker of the Silca branded tubes.
Anyway, again, my fault for not following Silca's instructions. One reason they recommend tubeless tape, rather than conventional cloth rim tape or rubber band rim strips, is to minimize the gap at the base of valve stem, so there's less risk of the tube extruding into the gap, weakening and eventually bursting.
I didn't have a spare latex tube and worried the other wheel might be about to fail the same way. So I replaced both latex tubes with Bontrager or Panaracer standard weight butyl tubes, and went for a ride.
The deterioration of the ride quality was immediately apparent, especially on the rough chipseal along one of my usual routes. It was really harsh and unpleasant.
If I hadn't tried other combinations of tires and tubes, I might be tempted to conclude that "carbon fiber is harsh, steel is compliant." But it's mostly the tires and tubes, not the bike frame material. When my steel and carbon fiber bikes are similarly shod, they feel about the same.
Ditto other factors, anything involving contact points: saddles and handlebars.
Due to chronic neck pain from old injuries I'm very picky about bike fit. I measure everything, try to set up each bike almost identically, choosing stem length to suit the overall reach, etc. And I video myself on the indoor trainer, and sometimes even outdoors, riding by several times in both directions, to check the ergonomics. So I know that once each bike is set up as closely as possible to each other, any other problems are probably due to the saddle and handlebar, even the handlebar wrap.
And if I don't use identical saddles, handlebars, bar wrap, etc., on each bike, it would be easy to blame the bike or frame material for issues that have nothing to do with steel vs carbon fiber.
Over a few years of experimenting with tires and tubes, I've realized the "feel" we sometimes attribute to the bike is more a factor of the rubber on the wheels.
Ditto all the contact points: saddle, handlebar, bar wrap, crank length, pedals, shoes, etc.
I started out with the cheap tires and tubes the bikes came with but eventually wondered whether better tires really would feel and ride better. Yeah, they do.
For the past year I've mostly used the Ironman with Soma Supple Vitesse SL in 700x23, with butyl tubes because my latex tubes were sized for 700x25 and larger tires and wouldn't quite fit without a risk of pinching. But the ride was terrific with those Soma tires, and of course the Ironman already has a nice steel bike feel.
The carbon fiber road bikes shared a wheelset with Continental GP Classic skinwalls, which ride nearly as well as the Soma but are better suited to bad roads -- more puncture resistant, longer wearing, without sacrificing a great ride feel. Those tires are 700x25 only. For the past year I've ridden those with Silca latex tubes. Fantastic ride feel, especially on the coarse chipseal that's becoming the new-normal in my area -- they aren't doing smooth blacktop anymore. It's all the equivalent to a gravel road with epoxy gluing the gravel together.
Latex tubes are a little more delicate than butyl but not as delicate as I'd expected. Until this week my only flat was a puncture on the rim-facing part of the tube, not a puncture through the tire from road debris. My fault. I ignored Silca's recommendation to use tubeless rim tape. Instead I just used the old Velox cloth tape that was already in the rims. Apparently there was a tiny shard of metal or bit of wire embedded in the rim tape that nicked the latex tube. Fortunately I was able to patch it with a self-adhesive Lezyne patch, which has held for the past year. So despite some claims that latex tubes can't be patched, it appears they can be patched with *some* types of patches.
I switched to some plastic rim strips that are fairly stiff and inflexible -- it looks like the stuff Schwalbe and others sell as a substitute for cloth or those useless rubber band rim strips that come with most cheap wheelsets. That seemed to be fine for about a year.
But a few days ago when I inflated the tire (latex tubes need to be topped up every day), the pressure of trying to mash the floor pump's chuck onto the valve pushed the valve into the wheel and I heard a pop, followed by immediate deflation. When I took out the tube it appeared as if the latex had extruded into a gap between the rim strip and valve hole in the rim. It might be repairable, I dunno. I'll check with Vittoria, the maker of the Silca branded tubes.
Anyway, again, my fault for not following Silca's instructions. One reason they recommend tubeless tape, rather than conventional cloth rim tape or rubber band rim strips, is to minimize the gap at the base of valve stem, so there's less risk of the tube extruding into the gap, weakening and eventually bursting.
I didn't have a spare latex tube and worried the other wheel might be about to fail the same way. So I replaced both latex tubes with Bontrager or Panaracer standard weight butyl tubes, and went for a ride.
The deterioration of the ride quality was immediately apparent, especially on the rough chipseal along one of my usual routes. It was really harsh and unpleasant.
If I hadn't tried other combinations of tires and tubes, I might be tempted to conclude that "carbon fiber is harsh, steel is compliant." But it's mostly the tires and tubes, not the bike frame material. When my steel and carbon fiber bikes are similarly shod, they feel about the same.
Ditto other factors, anything involving contact points: saddles and handlebars.
Due to chronic neck pain from old injuries I'm very picky about bike fit. I measure everything, try to set up each bike almost identically, choosing stem length to suit the overall reach, etc. And I video myself on the indoor trainer, and sometimes even outdoors, riding by several times in both directions, to check the ergonomics. So I know that once each bike is set up as closely as possible to each other, any other problems are probably due to the saddle and handlebar, even the handlebar wrap.
And if I don't use identical saddles, handlebars, bar wrap, etc., on each bike, it would be easy to blame the bike or frame material for issues that have nothing to do with steel vs carbon fiber.
Likes For canklecat:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,046
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn World Sport. 1994 Diamond Back Response Elite MTB. 1964 Schwinn Typhoon. 1974 Bridgestone Sprinter, 2015 Scott Sub 10 Citybike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1688 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
37 Posts
I have one modern bike, it's kind of an oddball, but I like it. Just rode it today. Very nice, Good brakes, easy shifting. It's a commuter. Smell the roses, all that sort of thing.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,526
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1506 Post(s)
Liked 3,464 Times
in
1,130 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,656
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,938 Times
in
1,763 Posts
Warning: Long anecdote ahead, but still relevant to the issue of how bikes "feel," which might not be a factor of steel vs aluminum vs carbon fiber, etc.
Over a few years of experimenting with tires and tubes, I've realized the "feel" we sometimes attribute to the bike is more a factor of the rubber on the wheels.
Ditto all the contact points: saddle, handlebar, bar wrap, crank length, pedals, shoes, etc.
Over a few years of experimenting with tires and tubes, I've realized the "feel" we sometimes attribute to the bike is more a factor of the rubber on the wheels.
Ditto all the contact points: saddle, handlebar, bar wrap, crank length, pedals, shoes, etc.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.