Forward facing vs rear facing horizontal track ends / dropouts?
#26
Senior Member
I'm going to flip it around, what's the advantage of the track ends?
Forward facing dropouts allow an easier wheel removal.
Forward facing dropouts allow easier wheel adjustment while keeping brake alignment.
Forward facing dropouts allow better wheel retention, since some of the force goes into the angled part of the dropout (ie, into the frame, whereas a track dropout has absolutely nothing stopping the wheel from sliding forward except for the axle clamping force).
I've had many bikes with both, and my strong preference is for forward facers.
Forward facing dropouts allow an easier wheel removal.
Forward facing dropouts allow easier wheel adjustment while keeping brake alignment.
Forward facing dropouts allow better wheel retention, since some of the force goes into the angled part of the dropout (ie, into the frame, whereas a track dropout has absolutely nothing stopping the wheel from sliding forward except for the axle clamping force).
I've had many bikes with both, and my strong preference is for forward facers.
#27
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
One advantage is the ability to securely run the rear axle all the way forward.
But with a track end, you can't pull the wheel completely free of the frame.
On the bikes for which track ends were originally designed, that's a moot point; they don't have brakes.
I have bikes with each kind of dropout, and I just use a tensioner on both. Makes setting and maintaining chain tension foolproof, and keeps the axle from moving.
I have bikes with each kind of dropout, and I just use a tensioner on both. Makes setting and maintaining chain tension foolproof, and keeps the axle from moving.
Last edited by Rolla; 11-13-21 at 10:40 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
I was looking at getting chain tugs for my Wabi. According to my digital caliper the dropout is @ 8.40mm thick. Since an 8mm tug is too small, I assume a 10mm would be fine? I'd like to get the MKS's unless someone has a better suggestion.
#29
Senior Member
- your chain length has to be just right to run the wheel all the way forward, which is unlikely, and even if you can achieve this...
- wheel removal is almost impossible with the chain tight and the wheel against the forward end of the track end. I've built a bike like this; I had to break the chain to remove the wheel. Doh!
One small advantage of track ends: you can minimize your chain stay length, which might be good for track use. A forward facing dropout requires some extra space between the tire and seat tube to remove the wheel.
#30
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Exercise your preferences as you will, but the "advantage : disadvantage" ratio is about equal.
#31
Steel is Real
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 39
Bikes: Wabi Lightning, Wabi Special, Wabi Thunder, Merckx Extra Corsa, Colnago Tecnos, Colnago Super, Cinelli Supercorsa, De Rosa Professional, De Rosa Replica 73, Serotta Colorado iii, Koga Miyata Full Pro, Panasonic RT-3500, Lynskey R320, Time VXRS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times
in
12 Posts
MKS won't fit. Surly makes a nice one (though admittedly large).
#32
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
The neat thing about the Surly Tuggnut is that it'll work with both a nutted solid axle and a quick release in a hollow axle. That is how I have my Soma Rush set up with Wabi wheels.
2011 Soma Rush with Wabi wheels.
2011 Soma Rush with Wabi wheels.