Suggestions to MKS for their pedals...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,551
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
399 Posts
Suggestions to MKS for their pedals...
I've been using MKS AR-2 Ezy pedals on my commuter bike for many years. Here are my respectful requests to the manufacturer:
1) Please, PLEASE make the pedal axles and couplers of stainless steel! I ride all year in Chicago, and there's a fair amount of corrosion that results from exposure to water and salt.
2) It would be great to have easily removable end caps for better serviceability.
3) Better pedal axle seals would help extend the service intervals.
These pedals have about 20,000 miles on them. They have been rebuilt several times, with re-surfacing of the inboard (crank-facing) axle bearings and replacement of all the balls. The pedal pictured here was damaged so that the end cap would no longer stay in. In spite of being open to the elements for several winter months, the outboard bearing was still well-greased compared to the inboard bearing. I've improvised an end cap out of an aluminum pan.
The couplers have been replaced because one of them cracked. I try to keep them coated with chain lube, but if the parts were made of stainless steel, their up-keep would be much easier.
A more robust end cap would be nice.
Pedal axle and coupler parts are susceptible to rust. They should be made of stainless steel.
This pedal coupler developed a crack, probably from stress risers caused by corrosion.
1) Please, PLEASE make the pedal axles and couplers of stainless steel! I ride all year in Chicago, and there's a fair amount of corrosion that results from exposure to water and salt.
2) It would be great to have easily removable end caps for better serviceability.
3) Better pedal axle seals would help extend the service intervals.
These pedals have about 20,000 miles on them. They have been rebuilt several times, with re-surfacing of the inboard (crank-facing) axle bearings and replacement of all the balls. The pedal pictured here was damaged so that the end cap would no longer stay in. In spite of being open to the elements for several winter months, the outboard bearing was still well-greased compared to the inboard bearing. I've improvised an end cap out of an aluminum pan.
The couplers have been replaced because one of them cracked. I try to keep them coated with chain lube, but if the parts were made of stainless steel, their up-keep would be much easier.
A more robust end cap would be nice.
Pedal axle and coupler parts are susceptible to rust. They should be made of stainless steel.
This pedal coupler developed a crack, probably from stress risers caused by corrosion.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
The problem with asking a manufacturer to make a longer lasting product is that they then get less future sales of that product. It is easy to think that long lived products are highly valued, but what really sells is the sizzle. The hype of going faster, going bigger, weighing less and not remaining the same forever. Andy (who has a pair of MKS Esquartz pedals looking for the right home)
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#3
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26408 Post(s)
Liked 10,376 Times
in
7,204 Posts
.
...they make an AR-2 without the easy in and out coupling. Fewer moving parts = more durable assembly. Is your commuter situation such that you really need this feature ?
Making the coupler parts out of stainless would increase the cost beyond what most of us are willing to pay for these.
...they make an AR-2 without the easy in and out coupling. Fewer moving parts = more durable assembly. Is your commuter situation such that you really need this feature ?
Making the coupler parts out of stainless would increase the cost beyond what most of us are willing to pay for these.
__________________
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,551
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
399 Posts
It's a folder. Only one pedal actually needs to fold, but it's essential.
So it looks like I will just keep these pedals going as long as I can... so far, so good.
#5
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
I wonder if the new coupler would fit your old pedal
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,833
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
535 Posts
No, that’s their cheap light pedal, if they do as you bid, not that they actually will, it won’t be cheap. Just buy another set, or buy one of their better pedals.
Tim
Tim
Last edited by tkamd73; 12-07-21 at 10:20 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Extreme conditions = Shorten your service interval times...
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,833
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
535 Posts
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
20,000 miles and I'd be wanting something new and pretty well before then. If for no other reason than just to have something to do for my bike. Though in truth, I'd probably have a new bike since riding the same thing year after year gets old and the grass is greener thing and just new bike fever in general starts to take hold of me.
#11
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
Your post made me do some research, my pedals are low end rinko and are not compatible with high end rinko. I have never turned to this forum for highend/boutique stuff but I’ve been proven wrong, I can’t buy the “real” rinko stuff from any popular American or German websites. TBH I have the same pedals in both quick release and fixed and they are stellar
Thanks for the education