Speed reduction from loose clothing/cool weather riding
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
Speed reduction from loose clothing/cool weather riding
I've noticed that my avg. speed on rides is down by anywhere from .5-1mph in the fall/spring vs. summer. I don't think this is a conditioning thing, but rather more likely a result of cooler air, which I think is denser and certainly wearing a somewhat loose fitting wind breaker...my guess is this is the biggest factor. Anyways, just curious if anyone has done more scientific tests on the topic (I am sure someone has)
#2
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
One of the first field tests I did (after convincing myself that I had a relatively sensitive method and protocol worked out) was on clothing. Clothing can have a big effect, depending.
Actually, when I was first working out protocols, I did a couple of tests on a relatively cool day so I was wearing a Pearl Izumi cycling jacket, tight through the body but the sleeves were a little loose. My CdA was high but believably high, and it was cool, so I never tested without the jacket. A few months later, I was testing during the summer and it warm, so I lowered the zipper on my jersey. Then I had an idea and zipped it up all the way. When I analyzed the data I realized I could spot exactly when I raised the zipper. So I went back out the next day and repeated the field test, with jersey zipper fully up and partially down. The difference, if I recall, was almost .01 m^2 in CdA. Later, I figured out that it wasn't that my jersey was a parachute when the zipper was open, it was that it bunched up and got looser around my shoulders and neck, and when the zipper was up the shoulders smoothed out and there weren't any wrinkles around the neck.
So I decided to check out my cycling jacket again, and was appalled at how much drag it added. Those sleeves were like parachutes. So now I almost always keep my jersey zipper up, and I hardly ever wear a jacket except on bitterly cold winter days. The rest of the time, if possible, I wear two jerseys and two sets of arm warmers.
We discussed this briefly, at around the 42:25 mark here: https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/nerd...s-made-simple/
If you want to know about a specific article of clothing and you have a power meter, you can do these tests pretty simply by yourself. If you don't have a power meter, it's a little more hassle but it's still possible. Ask if you're interested.
Actually, when I was first working out protocols, I did a couple of tests on a relatively cool day so I was wearing a Pearl Izumi cycling jacket, tight through the body but the sleeves were a little loose. My CdA was high but believably high, and it was cool, so I never tested without the jacket. A few months later, I was testing during the summer and it warm, so I lowered the zipper on my jersey. Then I had an idea and zipped it up all the way. When I analyzed the data I realized I could spot exactly when I raised the zipper. So I went back out the next day and repeated the field test, with jersey zipper fully up and partially down. The difference, if I recall, was almost .01 m^2 in CdA. Later, I figured out that it wasn't that my jersey was a parachute when the zipper was open, it was that it bunched up and got looser around my shoulders and neck, and when the zipper was up the shoulders smoothed out and there weren't any wrinkles around the neck.
So I decided to check out my cycling jacket again, and was appalled at how much drag it added. Those sleeves were like parachutes. So now I almost always keep my jersey zipper up, and I hardly ever wear a jacket except on bitterly cold winter days. The rest of the time, if possible, I wear two jerseys and two sets of arm warmers.
We discussed this briefly, at around the 42:25 mark here: https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/nerd...s-made-simple/
If you want to know about a specific article of clothing and you have a power meter, you can do these tests pretty simply by yourself. If you don't have a power meter, it's a little more hassle but it's still possible. Ask if you're interested.
Last edited by RChung; 04-29-21 at 08:22 AM.
Likes For RChung:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Clothing makes a huge difference - see how you go in street clothes; you barely make into the big ring if you're rocking 39/53.
#4
Full Member
Cooler air, as well as flappy clothing will make a difference. I did 2 x 10 mile TTs a week apart on the same course earlier this month. Wind conditions were the same. Temperature was about 8-10 degrees Celsius different. The colder week, I was 28 seconds slower for the same power output. Everyone who raced both weeks also had times between 25-35 seconds slower.
Likes For rivers:
#5
he said member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 13,802
Bikes: yes please
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2789 Post(s)
Liked 1,951 Times
in
1,207 Posts
Colder air = higher air density. Now factor in the floppy clothes ( not really a hard fast factor. You can buy proper riding clothes that fit correctly and font flop.) With the thicker air.
#7
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
Depends on how you rank on the Chewbacca scale but, yeah, it can be significant. Legs mostly, because they're cylinders that are moving around and around. The head is pretty static, so shaving your face appears not to have the same benefit as shaving your legs. i suspect, but don't know because I haven't tested this, that forearms are less important than upper arm so if you've got an arm fur issue, you should either shave or avoid sleeveless jerseys. Actually, speaking of arm and leg fur, let's keep this review for Veet in mind: https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-r...R2QP56S5P2DEGA
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
260 Posts
Extra clothing (even if non-flappy) will cause you to be slower because the body isn't dissipating heat as well with the extra layers on.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Actually, speaking of arm and leg fur, let's keep this review for Veet in mind: https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-r...R2QP56S5P2DEGA
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
165 Posts
Depends on how you rank on the Chewbacca scale but, yeah, it can be significant. Legs mostly, because they're cylinders that are moving around and around. The head is pretty static, so shaving your face appears not to have the same benefit as shaving your legs. i suspect, but don't know because I haven't tested this, that forearms are less important than upper arm so if you've got an arm fur issue, you should either shave or avoid sleeveless jerseys. Actually, speaking of arm and leg fur, let's keep this review for Veet in mind: https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-r...R2QP56S5P2DEGA
Likes For Jack Tone:
#11
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
It's sort of like swimming -- it used to be thought that Olympic swim suits should be as minimally skimpy as possible (whence the brand name "Speedo") but it's now realized that well-designed higher coverage swim suits are faster. The same applies to cycling. So no riding in your thong, especially if you've got body fur. No one needs to see that. Unless they're into Furries. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but keep it to yourself.
That said, I have never been able to produce the same watts when my knees are covered. So on those occasions when I'm trying for speed (less and less common as the days pass) I never wear leggings, or even knee warmers.
Last edited by RChung; 04-29-21 at 11:30 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Since there's no racing and I want to wear nice kit sometimes, I've been doing some of my training rides in my long sleeve CX skinsuit (so no food and I throw my phone in the saddle bag since the kit has no pockets) and wearing a lazer bullet aero helmet. Seems that at around 260ish watts I'm around 21.5mph on flattish terrain I've ridden on in southern MA and the Cape recently. Normally I try to focus more on watts than speed but I'm getting awfully competitive on some segments, even with my bottom of the range Allez. The next step in low hanging fruit would be leg shaving (I've done it before but never really kept it up), and I'm certainly pretty high on the chewbacca scale so hoping the helps. And oddly enough I just realized today that my handlebars are 42cm, so I am thinking of going down to 40cm, any idea how much that would help? I've used 38cm in the past comfortably, but I'm kind of thinking of splitting the middle because I've got a good fit going and don't want to muck it up too much
#13
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
I just realized today that my handlebars are 42cm, so I am thinking of going down to 40cm, any idea how much that would help? I've used 38cm in the past comfortably, but I'm kind of thinking of splitting the middle because I've got a good fit going and don't want to muck it up too much
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
It depends on how wide your shoulders are and where your elbows end up -- if your elbows stick out when your bars are too narrow, you could end up with worse drag. However, if that's not your problem, narrow bars are usually an aero drag win. Some riders who go to narrow bars and end up with flared elbows find they can salvage their position either with a slightly longer stem or slightly lower bars (either by removing a spacer or else changing the stem angle slightly).
#15
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Yup, clothing fit matters.
#17
Full Member
Climate has an effect on body temperature and body temperature has an effect on endurance. Of course, higher environmental temps. result in higher body temps. Significant studies have shown (not surprisingly) that increased body temp. reduces endurance. Beyond that, increased body temp. impacts the shift between aerobic and anaerobic breathing. So, in theory, riders should have more endurance in colder temps. However, adding layers negates the advantage gained from lower temps. Thus, adding clothing creates three negative impacts: weight and drag (mentioned in earlier posts) plus body heat.
#18
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
Not necessarily. For endurance efforts, our metabolic efficiency is mostly constant (it appears possible that we can change it, slowly, over time, but not for any single ride). So at any work rate, we have to dump a lot of heat no matter what. But we can get rid of that excess heat either convectively or evaporatively. So it's not just temperature, it's heat flux. Plus, of course, as noted above, air density decreases with high temperature.
I've worked with a couple of record attempts where the rider could choose when to go, and we spent some time forecasting temperature, humidity, and air density to figure out what might be best. It's rarely as simple as "the cooler the better" or "the warmer the better."
I've worked with a couple of record attempts where the rider could choose when to go, and we spent some time forecasting temperature, humidity, and air density to figure out what might be best. It's rarely as simple as "the cooler the better" or "the warmer the better."
#19
Full Member
Not necessarily. For endurance efforts, our metabolic efficiency is mostly constant (it appears possible that we can change it, slowly, over time, but not for any single ride). So at any work rate, we have to dump a lot of heat no matter what. But we can get rid of that excess heat either convectively or evaporatively. So it's not just temperature, it's heat flux. Plus, of course, as noted above, air density decreases with high temperature.
I've worked with a couple of record attempts where the rider could choose when to go, and we spent some time forecasting temperature, humidity, and air density to figure out what might be best. It's rarely as simple as "the cooler the better" or "the warmer the better."
I've worked with a couple of record attempts where the rider could choose when to go, and we spent some time forecasting temperature, humidity, and air density to figure out what might be best. It's rarely as simple as "the cooler the better" or "the warmer the better."
Here's one peer reviews study: Impact of Environmental Parameters on Marathon Running Performance,
Air temperature is the most important factor influencing marathon running performance for runners of all levels. It greatly influences the entire distribution of runners' performances as well as the percentage of withdrawals. Running speed at all levels is linked to temperature through a quadratic model. Any increase or decrease from the optimal temperature range will result in running speed decrease.
Likes For Tony P.:
#20
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,149 Times
in
491 Posts
I'm sorry for not being more specific. I didn't mean to suggest any change in temperature will always impact endurance irrespective of the individual. And it's clear that training mitigates the impact of climate. However, there have been numerous studies over a period of, perhaps, 20 years showing that body temperature impacts endurance and environmental conditions impact body temperature.
Here's one peer reviews study: Impact of Environmental Parameters on Marathon Running Performance,
Here's an analysis I believe is from that study that demonstrates the result:
Here's one peer reviews study: Impact of Environmental Parameters on Marathon Running Performance,
Here's an analysis I believe is from that study that demonstrates the result:
I looked at performance times for Ironman triathlons and, perhaps interestingly, the optimal conditions for the running leg appear different to the optimal conditions for the swimming and cycling legs. You can see that faster runs occur under slightly cooler conditions than faster swims and faster rides. That's why convective and evaporative cooling are important--water is a better heat conductor than air, and when riding you're typically going faster than when running so convection can be higher.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 988 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
439 Posts
I've noticed that my avg. speed on rides is down by anywhere from .5-1mph in the fall/spring vs. summer. I don't think this is a conditioning thing, but rather more likely a result of cooler air, which I think is denser and certainly wearing a somewhat loose fitting wind breaker...my guess is this is the biggest factor. Anyways, just curious if anyone has done more scientific tests on the topic (I am sure someone has)
Tight clothes helps being more aerodynamic for sure. In terms of air density, cold air is denser so it can explain why you move slower.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
#23
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
I just ran some numbers through bikecalculator.com:
Power: 150 watts, Temperature: 77 F, Speed: 19.11 mph
Power: 150 watts, Temperature: 55 F, Speed: 18.87 mph
Speed reduction: 1.3%