Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Cervelo Wino (warranty in name only)

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Cervelo Wino (warranty in name only)

Old 01-28-22, 02:44 PM
  #1  
meditationride
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cervelo Wino (warranty in name only)

Hello, longtime lurker/reader and finally a first time poster. My recent experiences I hope will aid or add to the body of knowledge.

I wrote off cycling after having each and everyone of my bikes stolen. Fast forward to university, my roommate was into triathlons and I thought I'd get into cycling again. Using part of my scholarship money (shhh), I bought a old used Cervelo One tri-bike that had been abandoned at a local bike shop. It was instant joy and happiness. I didn't have many possessions or much money but I took that bike everywhere I moved to. Eventually I saved enough to buy a R3 demo bike. Wowzers, it was such a great time. I rode that bike on the west coast mountains, windy flats of the praries, the rolling hills of ontario, and various cancer/charity rides. There was a lot of good memories and experiences in that bicycle. Although it had to be warrantied twice, both times were smooth and it was never a concern.
Well into my career and my 20's getting further away, I replaced the R3 with a C3. To me it gave me the same great feeling while being much more comfortable. Two seasons in (riding season is 5-6 months for sane people here), a crack developed in the fork. Ok, no big deal, warranty. At this point, I've been riding cervelo for 15 years.
The warranty process was started at the local bike shop and as expected there were no replacement forks and they likely would not make one. I was fully aware of the current situation and that the C series had been discontinued. I responded that's fine and requested to replace the fork/frame with whatever the successor/analogue they're making now. I will pay the difference and wait until whenever. My position was that this was a win/win solution for this odd time.
Cervelo rejected the request and instead offered a mismatching and downgraded fork from a C2 model. They then took the position that it was a "good will gesture". I replied, that offering a mismatching downgraded fork is not an appropriate outcome. I reiterated that this is a legitimate warranty claim and that I can pay for the difference and will wait until whenever. That was two months ago and there have been no further replies from cervelo.
In addition to starting out with cervelo, and them making what I felt was well suited for me, a strong consideration was their warranty policy. However, this event has been a big turnoff. I am left with the option of repairing the fork at a carbon specialist at my expense or taking the mismatched downgrade. Perhaps more importantly, it is introducing headaches for my almost therapeutic activity.
For any prospective shoppers, cervelo's warranty perhaps should not be a big consideration.
meditationride is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 02:59 PM
  #2  
burnthesheep
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,210

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,424 Times in 886 Posts
Originally Posted by meditationride View Post
I replaced the R3 with a C3.

instead offered a mismatching and downgraded fork from a C2 model.
For most of these brands, until you break from one model set to the "superbikes" frames and forks are interchangeable and the same. The difference is in groupset buildup.

Do you have proof the C2 fork is any different than the C3?

Their build specs on the current Caledonias list the same fork for each build, from 105 on up.

I would check to make sure, I highly doubt the C3 had a different fork. Once you get from their "2 and 3" models to the "5" is usually when the change in frameset carbon layup, forks, bars happens.
burnthesheep is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:05 PM
  #3  
meditationride
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
good point. Aside from the paintjob, I have not been able to find any technical information to determine whether they're same or not. I will admit there's vanity going on with not wanting the harlequin parts bin look
meditationride is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:08 PM
  #4  
shelbyfv
Senior Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 10,039
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2970 Post(s)
Liked 3,754 Times in 1,931 Posts
Originally Posted by meditationride View Post
Hello, longtime lurker/reader and finally a first time poster. My recent experiences I hope will aid or add to the body of knowledge.

I wrote off cycling after having each and everyone of my bikes stolen. Fast forward to university, my roommate was into triathlons and I thought I'd get into cycling again. Using part of my scholarship money (shhh), I bought a old used Cervelo One tri-bike that had been abandoned at a local bike shop. It was instant joy and happiness. I didn't have many possessions or much money but I took that bike everywhere I moved to. Eventually I saved enough to buy a R3 demo bike. Wowzers, it was such a great time. I rode that bike on the west coast mountains, windy flats of the praries, the rolling hills of ontario, and various cancer/charity rides. There was a lot of good memories and experiences in that bicycle. Although it had to be warrantied twice, both times were smooth and it was never a concern.

Well into my career and my 20's getting further away, I replaced the R3 with a C3. To me it gave me the same great feeling while being much more comfortable. Two seasons in (riding season is 5-6 months for sane people here), a crack developed in the fork. Ok, no big deal, warranty. At this point, I've been riding cervelo for 15 years.
The warranty process was started at the local bike shop and as expected there were no replacement forks and they likely would not make one. I was fully aware of the current situation and that the C series had been discontinued. I responded that's fine and requested to replace the fork/frame with whatever the successor/analogue they're making now. I will pay the difference and wait until whenever. My position was that this was a win/win solution for this odd time.
Cervelo rejected the request and instead offered a mismatching and downgraded fork from a C2 model.
They then took the position that it was a "good will gesture". I replied, that offering a mismatching downgraded fork is not an appropriate outcome. I reiterated that this is a legitimate warranty claim and that I can pay for the difference and will wait until whenever. That was two months ago and there have been no further replies from cervelo.
In addition to starting out with cervelo, and them making what I felt was well suited for me, a strong consideration was their warranty policy. However, this event has been a big turnoff. I am left with the option of repairing the fork at a carbon specialist at my expense or taking the mismatched downgrade. Perhaps more importantly, it is introducing headaches for my almost therapeutic activity.
For any prospective shoppers, cervelo's warranty perhaps should not be a big consideration
.
I wonder if there is a difference in their view of the damage and yours. The phrases "good will gesture" and "legitimate warranty claim" seem to indicate some disconnect. Maybe post Cervelo's responses?
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 01-28-22, 03:15 PM
  #5  
meditationride
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That could be possible. I am unable to post pictures yet as an under 10 poster but here is the word for word reply;
“this type of damage is most definitely not common. For that reason we are prepared to offer a good will replacement front fork.”. -- insert serial of mismatching fork --
"we are not open to negotiating this further, if they would like their fork replaced, please let me know if we are in agreement and I will go ahead and send the fork over"
meditationride is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:38 PM
  #6  
Iride01
MotuekaCascadeChinook
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 10,413

Bikes: '20 Tarmac Disc Comp '78 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4196 Post(s)
Liked 2,724 Times in 1,898 Posts
I'm sure that no matter what the bike brand is, someone somewhere has has a similar experience with the warranty's of those brands.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:41 PM
  #7  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,990

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1868 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times in 1,226 Posts
Originally Posted by meditationride View Post
good point. Aside from the paintjob, I have not been able to find any technical information to determine whether they're same or not. I will admit there's vanity going on with not wanting the harlequin parts bin look
If you don't know, then why did you state that they "offered a mismatching and downgraded fork from a C2"?
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 01-28-22, 03:43 PM
  #8  
MidTNBrad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 378

Bikes: 2016 Cervelo R3 & 1999 Litespeed Tuscany

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 113 Times in 65 Posts
I bought my R3 in 2016 and at that time the lineup was R2 - R3 - R5. I'm pretty sure that one of the differences between the R2 and R3 (maybe the only difference) was the fork. It could be that the C2 and C3 differed that way too.
MidTNBrad is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:44 PM
  #9  
meditationride
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tomato; the manufacture themselves placed it on a different model with a different part serial number.
From a consumer standpoint, the manufacturer differentiated the part and made the assertion. it is up to them to prove otherwise.
why should the consumer be left with mismatching esthetics at best and lower quality fork at worst?
meditationride is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 03:50 PM
  #10  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,990

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1868 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times in 1,226 Posts
Originally Posted by meditationride View Post
tomato; the manufacture themselves placed it on a different model with a different part serial number.
From a consumer standpoint, the manufacturer differentiated the part and made the assertion. it is up to them to prove otherwise.
why should the consumer be left with mismatching esthetics at best and lower quality fork at worst?
Cervelo said the fork was "mismatched and downgraded"?
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 01-28-22, 03:57 PM
  #11  
meditationride
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
no, it is not in their interest to do so. The available facts are that it is original equipment on a model named and positioned lower along with a different part serial number and paint scheme.
meditationride is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 04:06 PM
  #12  
burnthesheep
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,210

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,424 Times in 886 Posts
Originally Posted by MidTNBrad View Post
I bought my R3 in 2016 and at that time the lineup was R2 - R3 - R5. I'm pretty sure that one of the differences between the R2 and R3 (maybe the only difference) was the fork. It could be that the C2 and C3 differed that way too.
The current spec on their website is identical on forks, if there is a difference they aren't advertising it for what is sold now. The difference in R2 and R3 could not have "only" been a fork. Most likely the 2 had 105 and "mix" components then the 3's usually had all Ultegra and none of the sub-105 "mix" parts. I almost bought an S3 in 2015. But got a Propel. At that time for the S's in the shop, that's the difference I saw from a 2 to a 3. The 2 had 105 shifters, an RS500 crank and rings, 105 FD and RD, and pretty basic wheels. The 3 had Ultegra everything, crank included. Sometimes they paint the forks on the nicer model different, but same underneath.

It wouldn't make sense to have the halo model 5's share a frame or fork with lower models and wind up having three different carbon layups for forks. Usually there are two layups on frames and forks........lower models, and uppers. Propel or Trinity advanced, versus pro for Giant. Cervelo, somewhere with the 2/3 then the 5. Etc.... Too costly to make 3 different carbon layups.

Without proof the layup is different, I doubt the thing is different other than color.

The sympathy I have with the OP is if the fork offered is the wrong color. If that's the case, I'd ask them to paint it to my colorway to match. That would be annoying.
burnthesheep is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 04:11 PM
  #13  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 37,959

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 352 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19467 Post(s)
Liked 8,008 Times in 4,043 Posts
Originally Posted by meditationride View Post
tomato; the manufacture themselves placed it on a different model with a different part serial number.
From a consumer standpoint, the manufacturer differentiated the part and made the assertion. it is up to them to prove otherwise.
why should the consumer be left with mismatching esthetics at best and lower quality fork at worst?
I'm not sure what else you're expecting. You're going to get an aesthetically mismatched fork regardless, and you'd rather that it's from a current, but different, model (the Caledonia is the most direct replacement) and you're under the assumption that it'll be better even if it's not made for your frame?

Reading between the lines on their comment of the "not common" nature of the damage, I think that I'd take what I can get.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 01-28-22, 04:16 PM
  #14  
curbtender
Senior Member
 
curbtender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,360

Bikes: Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Schwinn Speedster, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, MB3

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1151 Post(s)
Liked 987 Times in 593 Posts
I would take the replacement fork they offered. Unless the fork came damaged I don't think it would be covered.
https://www.cervelo.com/en/warranty
curbtender is offline  
Likes For curbtender:
Old 01-28-22, 04:21 PM
  #15  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times in 687 Posts
You've had three warranty claims with Cervelo?

Something isn't right.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 04:29 PM
  #16  
grizzly59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 281 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times in 164 Posts
The best you're going to get ... take the fork. Maybe they have an acceptable color. Or you need a friend at an autobody shop who can paint it. Anymore, companies might imply there is a different C2 and C3 fork to make the C3 seem more better, but it's the same part as the C2, pulled out of the bin with the left hand instead of the right.
grizzly59 is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 04:29 PM
  #17  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,990

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1868 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times in 1,226 Posts
Originally Posted by GhostRider62 View Post
You've had three warranty claims with Cervelo?

Something isn't right.
Yeah. We're almost certainly getting a very biased (and inaccurate?) account of the situation.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 01-28-22, 04:36 PM
  #18  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe View Post
Yeah. We're almost certainly getting a very biased (and inaccurate?) account of the situation.
I sort of felt like OP when Zipp did a recall for the hubs on my 404 hubs, I asked them to warranty the rims due to cracks and offered to pay any differential. They did not even respond. They just replaced the hubs using the old spokes. In OP's case, the fork is not subject to a recall and it seems Cervelo is of the opinion that the damage is not a warranty issue.

He has no recourse. Take what you can get and maybe be thankful. Post a picture when you hit 10 posts. I bet it is damage from misuse
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 08:17 PM
  #19  
bampilot06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 5,444

Bikes: Cervélo C2, Ritchey Breakaway

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4852 Post(s)
Liked 2,145 Times in 936 Posts
What cracked on the C3 fork?
I own a C2, just wondering if there is something else I should be concerned about, other than the persistent BB creak.
bampilot06 is offline  
Old 01-28-22, 08:42 PM
  #20  
jrobe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
I bet Cervelo would prefer that he buys another brand next time after 2 bikes and 3 warranty claims.
jrobe is offline  
Likes For jrobe:
Old 01-29-22, 01:09 AM
  #21  
RChung
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,919
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Liked 570 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by burnthesheep View Post
I almost bought an S3 in 2015. But got a Propel. At that time for the S's in the shop, that's the difference I saw from a 2 to a 3. The 2 had 105 shifters, an RS500 crank and rings, 105 FD and RD, and pretty basic wheels. The 3 had Ultegra everything, crank included. Sometimes they paint the forks on the nicer model different, but same underneath.
I bought a 2016 S2. It has the same frame but a different fork than the S3. Damon Rinard said that they'd figured out how to make the S2 fork cheaper and just as aero as the S3 fork, and I trust Damon so I bought the S2.
RChung is offline  
Old 01-29-22, 07:16 AM
  #22  
burnthesheep
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,210

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,424 Times in 886 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung View Post
I bought a 2016 S2. It has the same frame but a different fork than the S3. Damon Rinard said that they'd figured out how to make the S2 fork cheaper and just as aero as the S3 fork, and I trust Damon so I bought the S2.
Well there we have it!

I never would have imagined. I assumed wrong.

Price was why I got the Propel. Locally it was about $400 less than the S2. And nowadays by the magic of scarcity is worth the same used I paid new for it.
burnthesheep is offline  
Old 01-29-22, 08:48 AM
  #23  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,076
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4932 Post(s)
Liked 7,114 Times in 3,084 Posts
I love it when someone joins bf just to slam a company.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 01-29-22, 08:55 AM
  #24  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,990

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1868 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times in 1,226 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote View Post
I love it when someone joins bf just to slam a company.
I did that to Chrysler. I would have destroyed them if the government hadn’t jumped in to save them.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 01-29-22, 09:23 AM
  #25  
mprince
Dont fix whats not broken
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 302

Bikes: Steelman Stage Race, Dura-Ace 9s

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times in 93 Posts
Where did the fork crack? Up by the stem, or closer to the dropouts?
mprince is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.