Max Tire Pressure Label (700 x 32)
07-13-22, 12:39 PM
#126
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Bikes: The Good Book of bicycling
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
29 Posts
No chance you damaged anything. None. Zero.
As for starting pressure using your bike+rider weight and estimating the speed as a moderate group ride on a worn tarmac surface (some cracks), start out at 62psi (4.3bar) R and 60.5 (4.2bar) F, and adjust up or down based on feel. https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form
Just for reference, I have a bike that rolls on tires measuring 35mm when inflated, tubeless, and the recommended pressures are about 55psi (3.7bar) and I routinely run them below 50psi (3.2-3.3bar) with no issues.
As for starting pressure using your bike+rider weight and estimating the speed as a moderate group ride on a worn tarmac surface (some cracks), start out at 62psi (4.3bar) R and 60.5 (4.2bar) F, and adjust up or down based on feel. https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form
Just for reference, I have a bike that rolls on tires measuring 35mm when inflated, tubeless, and the recommended pressures are about 55psi (3.7bar) and I routinely run them below 50psi (3.2-3.3bar) with no issues.
i like more pressure in my tires for the feel; the tires are 35mm front and 32mm rear. these tires are much more comfy than my racing bike tires which are 25mm and inflate to about 100psi. my bikes are for recreational use, basically irrelevant what the inflation is as they travel on rural roads near my home. problems? generally no.
Last edited by Duo; 08-03-22 at 10:38 AM.
Likes For Duo:
07-13-22, 09:06 PM
#127
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I weigh slightly less but my bike is a few pounds more, so total weight will be about the same. I ride 700x32s on crushed stone trails (call it category 1 gravel) and usually about 58 psi rear and 56 psi front. Slightly lower is actually faster but starts to feel too soft to suit my taste. On just roads I might go up a couple PSI, but I suspect it wouldn’t be faster, only firmer.
Otto
Otto
07-18-22, 11:25 AM
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 583 Times
in
438 Posts
Gotta love thread revives!
I never exceed the recommended pressure. It's almost always too high anyways...
Riding tubeless 28mms tires on hookless rims @ 68PSI rear & 65PSI front and I weigh 165lbs. I know I could go lower, but I find it's the sweet spot.
I doubt you'd damage anything by running them overinflated a few times. These things are dumb proof. Hookless rims are a little scarier though, because you know, design.
I never exceed the recommended pressure. It's almost always too high anyways...
Riding tubeless 28mms tires on hookless rims @ 68PSI rear & 65PSI front and I weigh 165lbs. I know I could go lower, but I find it's the sweet spot.
I doubt you'd damage anything by running them overinflated a few times. These things are dumb proof. Hookless rims are a little scarier though, because you know, design.
08-03-22, 10:39 AM
#129
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Bikes: The Good Book of bicycling
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
29 Posts
Gotta love thread revives!
I never exceed the recommended pressure. It's almost always too high anyways...
Riding tubeless 28mms tires on hookless rims @ 68PSI rear & 65PSI front and I weigh 165lbs. I know I could go lower, but I find it's the sweet spot.
I doubt you'd damage anything by running them overinflated a few times. These things are dumb proof. Hookless rims are a little scarier though, because you know, design.
I never exceed the recommended pressure. It's almost always too high anyways...
Riding tubeless 28mms tires on hookless rims @ 68PSI rear & 65PSI front and I weigh 165lbs. I know I could go lower, but I find it's the sweet spot.
I doubt you'd damage anything by running them overinflated a few times. These things are dumb proof. Hookless rims are a little scarier though, because you know, design.
thanks.
08-04-22, 08:01 AM
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 583 Times
in
438 Posts
Not sure why you have the wider tire in front. It's usually the opposite (aerodynamics). If you are looking for comfort, it's the rear one that should be wider. The front tire is always getting less load than the rear one.
08-04-22, 08:40 AM
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
For gravel and MTB, it's not uncommon for people to put a wider tire up front for grip and handling. At least that's my understanding - I'm too persnickety to have mismatching tires.
Likes For WhyFi:
