Why aren't road penalties higher?
#1
Newbie racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,568 Times
in
973 Posts
Why aren't road penalties higher?
Local story from yesterday: 4 teens killed. Driver of deliver box truck crosses median and hit them head on in their vehicle (not bikes). Charges? Misdemeanor death by motor vehicle and speeding.
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
Likes For burnthesheep:
#2
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Local story from yesterday: 4 teens killed. Driver of deliver box truck crosses median and hit them head on in their vehicle (not bikes). Charges? Misdemeanor death by motor vehicle and speeding.
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
Loaded question, not going to play.
Likes For livedarklions:
#3
Tractorlegs
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185
Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
42 Posts
Local story from yesterday: 4 teens killed. Driver of deliver box truck crosses median and hit them head on in their vehicle (not bikes). Charges? Misdemeanor death by motor vehicle and speeding.
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
Like, what? Life is that cheap? 4 of them?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Trikeman
#4
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
634 Posts
There are very few "accidents"!!!!! 99% of the time someone did something wrong, and probably against the law.
Likes For rydabent:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 901
Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked 539 Times
in
302 Posts
The short version is "because there are too many people driving who should not be driving but they need to to function in modern society in many places."
Likes For DangerousDanR:
#6
Newbie racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,568 Times
in
973 Posts
Like, if you swerved over the median due to a vehicle stopping in front of you...........following too closely. Against the law.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,879
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3906 Post(s)
Liked 7,182 Times
in
2,905 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,339
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2429 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,646 Posts
It’s No Accident: Advocates Want to Speak of Car ‘Crashes’ Instead
Just don’t call them accidents anymore.That is the position of a growing number of safety advocates, including grass-roots groups, federal officials and state and local leaders across the country. They are campaigning to change a 100-year-old mentality that they say trivializes the single most common cause of traffic incidents: human error.
“When you use the word ‘accident,’ it’s like, ‘God made it happen,’ ” Mark Rosekind, the head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a driver safety conference this month at the Harvard School of Public Health.
“In our society,” he added, “language can be everything.”
#9
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
From this NY Times page:
That is the position of a growing number of safety advocates, including grass-roots groups, federal officials and state and local leaders across the country. They are campaigning to change a 100-year-old mentality that they say trivializes the single most common cause of traffic incidents: human error.
“When you use the word ‘accident,’ it’s like, ‘God made it happen,’ ” Mark Rosekind, the head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a driver safety conference this month at the Harvard School of Public Health.
“In our society,” he added, “language can be everything.”
It’s No Accident: Advocates Want to Speak of Car ‘Crashes’ Instead
Just don’t call them accidents anymore.That is the position of a growing number of safety advocates, including grass-roots groups, federal officials and state and local leaders across the country. They are campaigning to change a 100-year-old mentality that they say trivializes the single most common cause of traffic incidents: human error.
“When you use the word ‘accident,’ it’s like, ‘God made it happen,’ ” Mark Rosekind, the head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a driver safety conference this month at the Harvard School of Public Health.
“In our society,” he added, “language can be everything.”
This is the kind of argument people make when they don't have any real ideas of how to reduce the problem. I don't see how "crash" really differs from "accident" in this regard , it's just slightly more vague as to causation. Don't see how that's any less "God made it happen."
#10
Senior Member
This is the kind of argument people make when they don't have any real ideas of how to reduce the problem. I don't see how "crash" really differs from "accident" in this regard , it's just slightly more vague as to causation. Don't see how that's any less "God made it happen."
#11
Senior Member
...
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
I don't like the suspected answer. Any old person might think selfish road behavior is fine and eventually get caught up in a bad incident but doesn't want the consequences.........but not many people take part in traditional "violent crime" so don't mine tossing the book at those crimes.
What's some practical reasons that car, bicycle, pedestrian death law brings such light penalties?
2) Majority of influential voters are drivers;
3) non-drivers are categorized as special interest groups.
So opportunistic politicians will criticize every increase fine as a cash-grab in order to get elected.
Likes For Daniel4:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,379
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 377 Times
in
262 Posts
It is true that in most states criminal intent has to be proven to charge someone with manslaughter or murder when motor vehicles are involved. Language is very important an can mean the difference between someone going to jail or not having any responsibility. Doctor Thomas Thompson's layer attempted to convince the judge that what he did was an accident. At the seen of the collision he told the first responder. A law officer all about his wows of having to put up with people on bicycles and confessed to passing then brake checking the two injured bicyclists. He got 5 years. The woman in Ventura county who killed two men one on a bicycle and the other driving a motorcycle admitted to texting. She got 7 years. As much as everybody including myself, wants to attack the person who may or may not be responsible for the injuries or deaths of others. It does not stop or reduce these terrible things from happening. We are fixated on the wrong thing here. We need to attack the problem not the person. Our laws are too car centric. Our public transportation system is less than adequate. Are speed limits in congested areas are too high. These are a few reasons that it is unsafe to be in or near the road. How do we change this? Change comes by force. Meaning enough people have to protest against what is happening to sway public opinion. Once this is done the real fight begins. People have to see that there is a real problem here to change.
#13
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Guess what? The NTSB calls those events "accidents". https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/.../aviation.aspx
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...ts/ASR1901.pdf
The whole " crash vs. accidents " thing isn't even a semantic difference.
Last edited by livedarklions; 06-05-21 at 12:10 AM.
#14
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
1) Majority of drivers are bad drivers (according to Expedia's Road Rage report of 2015);
2) Majority of influential voters are drivers;
3) non-drivers are categorized as special interest groups.
So opportunistic politicians will criticize every increase fine as a cash-grab in order to get elected.
2) Majority of influential voters are drivers;
3) non-drivers are categorized as special interest groups.
So opportunistic politicians will criticize every increase fine as a cash-grab in order to get elected.
How about maybe 90% of voters are drivers?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
I think this is the OP's cash report
It doesn't say whether the driver was going above the speed limit, or below the speed limit.
Technically, drivers are supposed to slow down when driving in inclement weather. Yet, for all practical purposes, killing 4 teens was an "accident".
The driver of the box truck was identified as Alberto Pedraza III. Troopers said he lost control of the truck because he was going too fast in the rain.
He has been charged with misdemeanor death by motor vehicle.
He has been charged with misdemeanor death by motor vehicle.
Technically, drivers are supposed to slow down when driving in inclement weather. Yet, for all practical purposes, killing 4 teens was an "accident".
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
The absolutely most important enabler in any crime or questionable activity is the belief that ”I can get away with this”. And as long as the perpetrator is of that opinion, then the severity of the punishment doesn’t matter. Increasing the perceived probability of getting caught is far more effective than insisting on harsher punishment.
Likes For dabac:
#17
Senior Member
"Fifty-one percent of Americans report that they loathe sharing the road with bad drivers, more than cyclists, buses, taxis, joggers and walkers combined. Nearly all Americans (97%) rate themselves as “careful” drivers, but feel that only 29% of fellow drivers merit the description."
viewfinder.expedia.com/news/expedia-2015-road-rage-report-texters-enrage-fellow-drivers-most-edging-tailgaters-and-left-lane-hogs-on-list-of-most-deplorable-driver-behaviors/amp/
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,339
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2429 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,646 Posts
Expedia Road Rage Report 2015
"Fifty-one percent of Americans report that they loathe sharing the road with bad drivers, more than cyclists, buses, taxis, joggers and walkers combined. Nearly all Americans (97%) rate themselves as “careful” drivers, but feel that only 29% of fellow drivers merit the description."
viewfinder.expedia.com/news/expedia-2015-road-rage-report-texters-enrage-fellow-drivers-most-edging-tailgaters-and-left-lane-hogs-on-list-of-most-deplorable-driver-behaviors/amp/
"Fifty-one percent of Americans report that they loathe sharing the road with bad drivers, more than cyclists, buses, taxis, joggers and walkers combined. Nearly all Americans (97%) rate themselves as “careful” drivers, but feel that only 29% of fellow drivers merit the description."
viewfinder.expedia.com/news/expedia-2015-road-rage-report-texters-enrage-fellow-drivers-most-edging-tailgaters-and-left-lane-hogs-on-list-of-most-deplorable-driver-behaviors/amp/
Likes For Trakhak:
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Expedia Road Rage Report 2015
"Fifty-one percent of Americans report that they loathe sharing the road with bad drivers, more than cyclists, buses, taxis, joggers and walkers combined. Nearly all Americans (97%) rate themselves as “careful” drivers, but feel that onuly 29% of fellow drivers merit the description."
viewfinder.expedia.com/news/expedia-2015-road-rage-report-texters-enrage-fellow-drivers-most-edging-tailgaters-and-left-lane-hogs-on-list-of-most-deplorable-driver-behaviors/amp/
"Fifty-one percent of Americans report that they loathe sharing the road with bad drivers, more than cyclists, buses, taxis, joggers and walkers combined. Nearly all Americans (97%) rate themselves as “careful” drivers, but feel that onuly 29% of fellow drivers merit the description."
viewfinder.expedia.com/news/expedia-2015-road-rage-report-texters-enrage-fellow-drivers-most-edging-tailgaters-and-left-lane-hogs-on-list-of-most-deplorable-driver-behaviors/amp/
If you think it's meaningful that almost all drivers think they're good and that most other drivers suck, knock yourself out, but all that reflects is a known psychological effect called "the fundamental attribution error.".
The US is the outlier in motor vehicle casualties and fatalities. That's a real problem that needs to be addressed seriously and systematically. But using stupid data, claiming that throwing more people in jail and quibbling about crash vs. accidents is just plain crummy advocacy.
BTW I don't think drivers in most other countries are generally better than American drivers. The real differences are in the quantity of driving, the size of the vehicles, and basic city design. We've got too many big vehicles being crammed into crowded city streets, and pedestrians and bicyclists bear a lot of the costs of that.
Likes For livedarklions:
#20
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Failing to remain fully engaged, while driving a car, is a deliberate choice. Few auto "accidents" are "acts of god;" more often then not, they are failures in judgement.
Since we can identify the causes of crashes, we can take action to alter the effect and avoid collisions. These are not Acts of God but predictable results of the laws of physics.
Here is the big difference... could the crash have been avoided by the driver? Not an Act of God then.
Sure, accidents do occur... such as sliding on black ice that wasn't recognizable, or hitting a deer that jumped out of the woods at the last second... these can be considered accidents, and Acts of God. Speeding, distraction, changing the radio, driving tired, failing to signal... any of those are deliberate acts by drivers.
This is not about "making up definitions of words." It IS about accepting responsibility for one's actions behind the wheel and not passing poor driving judgement off as something "unavoidable." The term "accident" as it is typically used today with regard to automobile collisions, IS actually a variation on the original definition of "accident." (IE, it was indeed a "made up" meaning.)
Likes For genec:
#21
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
If someone posts they're "not going to play", and then follows it up with several posts over the next couple of hours, is that an accident?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,259
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 476 Times
in
258 Posts
1: the Advocacy & Safety forum is a breathtaking environment.
2: cars dominate society to the detriment of everything else.
3: people in cars consistently make choices that kill others.
2: cars dominate society to the detriment of everything else.
3: people in cars consistently make choices that kill others.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
Poor design of flight controls. Poor FAA oversight. Poor pilot training. Poor pricing structure for "options" on the jets. All combined to make deadly crashes (which I believe the pilots paid for with their lives).
#24
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
And the NTSB specifically refers to both of the 737 Max events as "accidents" . What the NTSB does is referred to as "accident investigation" , and the process itself is obviously based on the idea that accidents don't just happen, they usually have multiple causes. This notion that "accident" implies lack of agency or lack of responsibility is absurd.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
When someone makes a deliberate choice to drive in a manner that is not recommended, not advised and may be against the law... then it isn't an "accident."
Failing to remain fully engaged, while driving a car, is a deliberate choice. Few auto "accidents" are "acts of god;" more often then not, they are failures in judgement.
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/newsroom/crash-not-accident
Here is the big difference... could the crash have been avoided by the driver? Not an Act of God then.
Sure, accidents do occur... such as sliding on black ice that wasn't recognizable, or hitting a deer that jumped out of the woods at the last second... these can be considered accidents, and Acts of God. Speeding, distraction, changing the radio, driving tired, failing to signal... any of those are deliberate acts by drivers.
This is not about "making up definitions of words." It IS about accepting responsibility for one's actions behind the wheel and not passing poor driving judgement off as something "unavoidable." The term "accident" as it is typically used today with regard to automobile collisions, IS actually a variation on the original definition of "accident." (IE, it was inLdeed a "made up" meaning.)
Failing to remain fully engaged, while driving a car, is a deliberate choice. Few auto "accidents" are "acts of god;" more often then not, they are failures in judgement.
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/newsroom/crash-not-accident
Here is the big difference... could the crash have been avoided by the driver? Not an Act of God then.
Sure, accidents do occur... such as sliding on black ice that wasn't recognizable, or hitting a deer that jumped out of the woods at the last second... these can be considered accidents, and Acts of God. Speeding, distraction, changing the radio, driving tired, failing to signal... any of those are deliberate acts by drivers.
This is not about "making up definitions of words." It IS about accepting responsibility for one's actions behind the wheel and not passing poor driving judgement off as something "unavoidable." The term "accident" as it is typically used today with regard to automobile collisions, IS actually a variation on the original definition of "accident." (IE, it was inLdeed a "made up" meaning.)
So, it is OK to slip on black ice, but it is not OK to lose traction on wet pavement?
We don't know a lot about this accident other than the driver was deemed to be driving too fast for road conditions, but it wasn't stated whether that was greater or less than the speed limit.
Likewise, slipping on black ice may mean driving too fast for road conditions, as well as poor experience steering out of a slide (which is tricky).
Here in the West, we have dry summers, then it can be downright treacherous with the first rain.
Hydroplaning can be a problem when some vehicles hit certain types of standing water.
Bald Tires?
Was the truck loaded or empty? A load can push a truck around some and increase stopping distance, whereas the rearend of an empty truck can be downright squirrely.