40T to 42T switch in a hybrid. Big difference?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
40T to 42T switch in a hybrid. Big difference?
My wife bought a Sirrus X5.0.
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T
I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills.
Thoughts?
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T
I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills.
Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: North Florida
Posts: 510
Bikes: 2019 Specialized Diverge, 2021 Cervelo Caledonia
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 378 Times
in
197 Posts
The difference is 5%. If she kept the same cadence and was going 15 mph with the 40T, she'd go 15.75 mph with the 42T.
#3
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Why not a 44t or even 46t? If there aren't lots of hills, how often does she (or anyone) really need a ratio that is that low?
#4
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,541
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1876 Post(s)
Liked 1,411 Times
in
979 Posts
A 11-51 cassette seems to be grossly unnecessary if you "don't live in an area with lots of hills," and the huge gaps between cogs in this cassette cannot be good for maintaining a steady cadence or for acceleration.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times
in
2,910 Posts
Is she complaining about the gears? An extra couple of teeth on the chainring is neither here nor there with such a large range cassette on the back. She probably wouldn't even notice the difference as she would simply compensate on the cassette. She would only notice if she's already spinning like crazy to keep up with you in the 40-11 gear. In which case you would want a considerably larger chainring anyway.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
#7
Senior Member
Top speed would occur in the 40/11 combination. Changing to a 44 tooth chain ring and a 1 inch longer chain would produce 10% more speed potential. So would a change to a cassette starting with a 10T sprocket, if available.
#8
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,111
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,414 Times
in
801 Posts
I would definitely go to a 46t, Increasing the ring by 2 teeth just is not a big enough difference to bother with, usually. However, if she only needs a small increase in top end, that might be enough. Personally, I would still go to at least a 44t.
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Have you looked at what the gear calculators on line show you? This is my go to one for just it's simplicity, but it gives more info about gears you may not have in the results.
https://www.bikecalc.com/speed_at_cadence
With a 1x front changing the front ring will impact the entire range of gearing. So if the current low ratio gears are needed for any of the riding done on that bike, then they will be gone if you increase the size of the front rings.
If the bike is only ridden on pavement or packed gravel, it's hard to imagine the low gears are currently needed though.
https://www.bikecalc.com/speed_at_cadence
With a 1x front changing the front ring will impact the entire range of gearing. So if the current low ratio gears are needed for any of the riding done on that bike, then they will be gone if you increase the size of the front rings.
If the bike is only ridden on pavement or packed gravel, it's hard to imagine the low gears are currently needed though.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
With the stock 38mm tires, 80rpm in the 40x11 = 23.81mph. 100rpm = 29.76rpm
If you upsize to a 42T, those numbers will go up to 24.91mph and 31.23mph.
I run a 44T on my 1x CX bike for summer gravel/dirt becuase I was occasionally spinning out the stock 40T (with an 11-32 cassette) when hammering in group rides, big tailwinds, descents, etc.
I can't imagine spending enough time at those speeds on a Sirrus to warrant swapping to a larger ring, but that bike also has a massive 11-51 12sp cassette, so even with a 44T there would still be plenty of low-end gearing for any small hills.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
I don't think taller gears are the answer if 15mph is the top speed we're talking about.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times
in
1,823 Posts
Not sure where the "15 mph" number came from.
I would ask the OP, does your wife use the top couple of cogs? I might go for both a bigger chain ring and a smaller cassette. 40x51 is ridiculous unless you are climbing mountains. Apparently there are 10x45 cassettes available, which would (very, very) slightly increase top end, while providing closer gearing and still plenty of climbing potential .... which you say she doesn't need anyway.
With a 46-tooth ring and a 10-45 cassette your wife would have decent road gearing and still have the same climbing capacity as a 50-34x11-32 combo which is pretty normal for a road bike used for climbing.
In any case .... 44 or 46 teeth on the ring sounds like a good place to start.
I would ask the OP, does your wife use the top couple of cogs? I might go for both a bigger chain ring and a smaller cassette. 40x51 is ridiculous unless you are climbing mountains. Apparently there are 10x45 cassettes available, which would (very, very) slightly increase top end, while providing closer gearing and still plenty of climbing potential .... which you say she doesn't need anyway.
With a 46-tooth ring and a 10-45 cassette your wife would have decent road gearing and still have the same climbing capacity as a 50-34x11-32 combo which is pretty normal for a road bike used for climbing.
In any case .... 44 or 46 teeth on the ring sounds like a good place to start.
#13
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
663 Posts
IMO, there is no benefit. 40/11 on 700x38 is a 100 inch gear and already at the maximum gearing allowed for junior racing. Plenty of gear on a hybrid. Changing the chainring just shifts all the gears a little bit. YMMV.
Otto
Otto
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
As long as she doesn't have the same power to weight ratio as you she will always be slower for most things.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,240
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4221 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times
in
916 Posts
What sort of speed are you talking about?
In the 11 tooth sprocket in the 40 tooth chain ring (with a 700C wheel with a 38mm tire), the following shows the speed for different pedal RPM (cadence).
40 11.9 mph
50 14.9 mph
60 17.9 mph
70 20.8 mph
80 23.8 mph
90 26.8 mph
With some practice, people can easily do 80 RPM.
The current set-up is likely good enough for the flats (it might be on the low side when going down hill).
In the 11 tooth sprocket in the 40 tooth chain ring (with a 700C wheel with a 38mm tire), the following shows the speed for different pedal RPM (cadence).
40 11.9 mph
50 14.9 mph
60 17.9 mph
70 20.8 mph
80 23.8 mph
90 26.8 mph
With some practice, people can easily do 80 RPM.
The current set-up is likely good enough for the flats (it might be on the low side when going down hill).
Last edited by njkayaker; 08-24-21 at 10:48 AM.
Likes For njkayaker:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times
in
2,910 Posts
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t.
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios?
And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette?
I would let her ride the bike and see what gears she uses. If she never goes anywhere near the 51T on the back then you might want to get a closer spaced cassette. But I would try it first.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times
in
1,823 Posts
If the OP's wife wants to go faster .... then we can assume that at her comfortable max revs in top gear, she is not going as fast as she wants. He does not mention his own pace.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter.
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable.
So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring.
The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter.
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable.
So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring.
The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times
in
2,910 Posts
If the OP's wife wants to go faster .... then we can assume that at her comfortable max revs in top gear, she is not going as fast as she wants. He does not mention his own pace.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter.
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable.
So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring.
The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter.
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable.
So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring.
The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell.
Likes For PeteHski:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,240
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4221 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times
in
916 Posts
It's fairly common for new riders to think that a bigger gear means they'll go faster. It's fairly common for new riders to use a low cadence.
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
The issue might be that the OP is seeking a equipment solution for something that really isn't a problem (or one that would be better addressing with some experience). She might not be a "happy rider" if the expectations aren't realistic.
Last edited by njkayaker; 08-24-21 at 12:21 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
I do love the thought of someone out on their new hybrid and just cruising along on a flat road in top gear at 25mph and being like "why is this bike so slow?".
Likes For msu2001la:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times
in
2,910 Posts
I think this is the trap the OP has probably fallen into here. She needs to ride the bike and get used to the gears before even thinking about changing the chainring or cassette. But for sure going from a 40T to a 42T chainring is going to be a complete waste of time.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times
in
1,823 Posts
yeah .... i reread the thread with this assumption and it fits. Could go either way ..... Hilarious. "My bike is too slow when I don't ride it .... how can i go faster?"
Anyway ..... it's only BF, after all .......
Anyway ..... it's only BF, after all .......
Likes For dvai:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,964
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2644 Post(s)
Liked 474 Times
in
344 Posts
Lol OP your wife sounds like a beast if she can spin a 40/11, that's a super heavy ratio on the flats for a new rider...
also not to be a jerk, but she probably won't really notice the difference between any of the setups mentioned. The top end is too high for her to use anyways unless she's a monster (and even then she should just spin faster)
also not to be a jerk, but she probably won't really notice the difference between any of the setups mentioned. The top end is too high for her to use anyways unless she's a monster (and even then she should just spin faster)