"Faster" frames?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
"Faster" frames?
Given the same tires/wheels, does a longer/slacker geometry like you'd see in a gravel bike any slower than a classic road geo? I mean, clearly, there's an aero component, if one bike has you sitting closer to straight up, but aside from that, unless you're running a crit or something where tights turns are a huge part of your game, is there any reason a roadie should be faster than a gravel bike, over, say, the course of a century?
Personally, I have short femurs and a long gorilla torso, so my weight winds up pretty far forward on most bikes, and a gravelly long front-center and slack front end lets me descend faster without feeling like I'm gonna endo, but I just wonder if there's an objective tradeoff I'm missing.
Thanks!
Personally, I have short femurs and a long gorilla torso, so my weight winds up pretty far forward on most bikes, and a gravelly long front-center and slack front end lets me descend faster without feeling like I'm gonna endo, but I just wonder if there's an objective tradeoff I'm missing.
Thanks!
#2
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Geometry affects handling more than speed.
Last edited by Rolla; 08-03-22 at 11:25 AM.
Likes For Rolla:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,768
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,873 Times
in
4,637 Posts
Let's hope that tiktak doesn't notice this thread.
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
It's more important that the bike fit you. So if the gravel bike feels better, then just put what ever tires on it you feel appropriate for the road and be done with it. Once you've ridden it several thousand miles, If you then think you should be doing better than you are at that time maybe it can be figured out what your next bike should be.
Guessing and imagining that we do here will leave you never being able to decide what bike to get.
While the gravel bikes seat tube is a tad slacker on various models, it's not that much slacker.
Guessing and imagining that we do here will leave you never being able to decide what bike to get.
While the gravel bikes seat tube is a tad slacker on various models, it's not that much slacker.
Last edited by Iride01; 08-03-22 at 01:33 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,869
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1792 Post(s)
Liked 1,671 Times
in
955 Posts
Well, I bought a gravel bike this year and I am enjoying the heck out of it. The ability to ride many mountain bike trails along with decent speed on the road is wonderful. However, there is a fly in the ointment. There is a short off-road Strava segment nearby that I had been trying to get a top rating on. On my gravel bike, I managed 7th place, not bad for a 72 year old, but I thought maybe I can do better. So, I took out my trusty Look 595 and did that section with it, guess what? Second place. To be honest this is a pretty smooth gravel path, slightly uphill at first. I am also an experienced mountain biker with little fear of unpaved surfaces. If the trail were less smooth my gravel bike would rule, but on smooth gravel my Look 595 road bike is way faster
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
If you ignore aerodynamics, weight, handling, and gearing, are only comparing two bikes that otherwise have identical fit in a straight line on a flat road with identical tires, they're all the same.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,022
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 272 Times
in
200 Posts
In the last two years I have owned systemsix ( aero road bike ), alloy topstone ( gravel bike ), giant revolt adv 2 ( gravel bike ) & now Ibix MX gravel bike.
When I put on the same carbon wheels with the gp5000 tires the SystemSix is a tad faster if I am trying real hard to go fast. I have a 37 mile loop that once in a while I try to avg 20 mph. At my lower power lever and speed seems like the aero bike was good for about 0.5 mph maybe 1mph that would be stretch. 1 mph is a lot if you are trying to go fast on bikes. A more powerful rider at higher speeds would notice a bigger difference in speeds.
If you like to ride in an aero position at 95% of the time at 95% of your power on your bike rides get the faster aero bike. You will enjoy it, they are fast!!! The person riding the bike is the biggest aero draw back. So if you not in an aero position your aero bike is not doing much for you.
Since 99% of the time I am not in an aero position I found the comfort and versatility of a gravel bike with multiply wheel sets suites me better.
The rest of time ( group rides, fitness rides, stop lights etc... ) there is zero difference in speed.
When I put on the same carbon wheels with the gp5000 tires the SystemSix is a tad faster if I am trying real hard to go fast. I have a 37 mile loop that once in a while I try to avg 20 mph. At my lower power lever and speed seems like the aero bike was good for about 0.5 mph maybe 1mph that would be stretch. 1 mph is a lot if you are trying to go fast on bikes. A more powerful rider at higher speeds would notice a bigger difference in speeds.
If you like to ride in an aero position at 95% of the time at 95% of your power on your bike rides get the faster aero bike. You will enjoy it, they are fast!!! The person riding the bike is the biggest aero draw back. So if you not in an aero position your aero bike is not doing much for you.
Since 99% of the time I am not in an aero position I found the comfort and versatility of a gravel bike with multiply wheel sets suites me better.
The rest of time ( group rides, fitness rides, stop lights etc... ) there is zero difference in speed.
#8
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,188
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Same wheels, tires and gearing, same rider aboard; for outright speed, it’s the aero, provided you’re riding fast enough. For sustained speed over a century, it’s the one that fits you best.
I have similar physiology to the OP, and I like something a little bit taller and longer, like a Synapse compared to a CAAD13, so that I don’t have as much weight on my hands
I’m also partial to wider bars and longish stems with steeper head tube angles, but steering/handling feel is very subjective and rider-dependent
I have similar physiology to the OP, and I like something a little bit taller and longer, like a Synapse compared to a CAAD13, so that I don’t have as much weight on my hands
I’m also partial to wider bars and longish stems with steeper head tube angles, but steering/handling feel is very subjective and rider-dependent
#9
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,932
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26250 Post(s)
Liked 10,231 Times
in
7,100 Posts
...I've never tried to figure it out, but I have a lot of different 70's and 80's bikes I ride here from time to time, in rotation. Certainly you're correct that the biggest single difference is in the rotating weight of wheels and tires. That's obvious when you upgrade them.
But I'm not sure there's not some effect from where your center of body mass sits in relation to the crank spindle. So with a shorter top tube, tighter geometry bicycle, I end up putting it together with a different (longer) stem. And the steeper angles of the frame usually set the seat tube more upright. All of this serves to move my overall center of body mass farther forward on the bicycle. Thus you end up more over the spindle axis. Most people find this a better position for spinning higher cadences. But I admit I don't have any real science to back this up. And the overall effect might be more one of perception than actual performance.
I don't ride with a speedometer, it's too distracting.
But I'm not sure there's not some effect from where your center of body mass sits in relation to the crank spindle. So with a shorter top tube, tighter geometry bicycle, I end up putting it together with a different (longer) stem. And the steeper angles of the frame usually set the seat tube more upright. All of this serves to move my overall center of body mass farther forward on the bicycle. Thus you end up more over the spindle axis. Most people find this a better position for spinning higher cadences. But I admit I don't have any real science to back this up. And the overall effect might be more one of perception than actual performance.
I don't ride with a speedometer, it's too distracting.
__________________
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,772
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1935 Post(s)
Liked 2,150 Times
in
1,313 Posts
Given the same tires/wheels, does a longer/slacker geometry like you'd see in a gravel bike any slower than a classic road geo? I mean, clearly, there's an aero component, if one bike has you sitting closer to straight up, but aside from that, unless you're running a crit or something where tights turns are a huge part of your game, is there any reason a roadie should be faster than a gravel bike, over, say, the course of a century?
Personally, I have short femurs and a long gorilla torso, so my weight winds up pretty far forward on most bikes, and a gravelly long front-center and slack front end lets me descend faster without feeling like I'm gonna endo, but I just wonder if there's an objective tradeoff I'm missing.
Thanks!
Personally, I have short femurs and a long gorilla torso, so my weight winds up pretty far forward on most bikes, and a gravelly long front-center and slack front end lets me descend faster without feeling like I'm gonna endo, but I just wonder if there's an objective tradeoff I'm missing.
Thanks!
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#11
Full Member
Thread Starter
...I've never tried to figure it out, but I have a lot of different 70's and 80's bikes I ride here from time to time, in rotation. Certainly you're correct that the biggest single difference is in the rotating weight of wheels and tires. That's obvious when you upgrade them.
But I'm not sure there's not some effect from where your center of body mass sits in relation to the crank spindle. So with a shorter top tube, tighter geometry bicycle, I end up putting it together with a different (longer) stem. And the steeper angles of the frame usually set the seat tube more upright. All of this serves to move my overall center of body mass farther forward on the bicycle. Thus you end up more over the spindle axis. Most people find this a better position for spinning higher cadences. But I admit I don't have any real science to back this up. And the overall effect might be more one of perception than actual performance.
I don't ride with a speedometer, it's too distracting.
But I'm not sure there's not some effect from where your center of body mass sits in relation to the crank spindle. So with a shorter top tube, tighter geometry bicycle, I end up putting it together with a different (longer) stem. And the steeper angles of the frame usually set the seat tube more upright. All of this serves to move my overall center of body mass farther forward on the bicycle. Thus you end up more over the spindle axis. Most people find this a better position for spinning higher cadences. But I admit I don't have any real science to back this up. And the overall effect might be more one of perception than actual performance.
I don't ride with a speedometer, it's too distracting.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 678
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times
in
195 Posts
As long as you can get "aero", there is no big speed difference between bicycle types running close to the same tire pressures, even when running different tire types and sizes. What makes any bike fast is the strength of the rider and aerodynamics, everything else is very minor. I tested my time over a 12+ mile route with no steep grades on three different road bikes and a classic MTB with 2.1" wide knobby tires, and I have finished the same route within 20 seconds on all of the bikes in the last year. The only change on the MTB setup between riding it offroad and on pavement is running either 40psi or 80psi in it's tires. So as long as the bike is sized to let you get horizontal, there is no advantage in speed in any other bike. It IS more comfortable to ride the road-bikes in a horizontal position though, but that is because of the drop bars of course. Here are two of my road bikes and what my MTB currently looks like;
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,642
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3431 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,723 Posts
I never thought a mountain bike could look completely uncomfortable. Until today.
Likes For smd4:
#14
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,007
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3341 Post(s)
Liked 3,442 Times
in
1,740 Posts
You rode four non-aero, antique bikes with crummy tires over a course at around the same speed. <slow clap>
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,510 Posts
There's another aspect to "fast" frames' Frames that feel "fast" or "race" inspire greater effort. More effort, faster times.
I just picked up a Pro Miyata frame from a forumite and set it up with roughly period race hardware. Chorus crank, Cyclone derailleurs and brakes, my usual Delta standard pedals, etc. First ride - this is a slightly less radical but just as pure race as my old Fuji Professional that I raced and loved, only now with late '80s better tubing and a couple of other nice touches. Like my Fuji, it just wants to go fast. And is a pure joy to ride fast. So it happens, Regularly. Always faster than I would on another bike. Just like you would drive a windy road faster in a Ferrari than a Volvo, even if you weren't in a hurry.
I just picked up a Pro Miyata frame from a forumite and set it up with roughly period race hardware. Chorus crank, Cyclone derailleurs and brakes, my usual Delta standard pedals, etc. First ride - this is a slightly less radical but just as pure race as my old Fuji Professional that I raced and loved, only now with late '80s better tubing and a couple of other nice touches. Like my Fuji, it just wants to go fast. And is a pure joy to ride fast. So it happens, Regularly. Always faster than I would on another bike. Just like you would drive a windy road faster in a Ferrari than a Volvo, even if you weren't in a hurry.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,175
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4274 Post(s)
Liked 4,713 Times
in
2,911 Posts
Likes For PeteHski:
#18
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,269 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Are any of them your size?