Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Warning N. CA East Bay Mtb'ers!

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Warning N. CA East Bay Mtb'ers!

Old 03-23-22, 01:25 PM
  #51  
livedarklions
High Performance Noodler
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 13,185

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6868 Post(s)
Liked 6,782 Times in 3,814 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
If that is not true, why then is the fine so obscenely high?

If the fine was lower, it wouldn't be much of a deterrent.

And I think the fine fits the crime. Calling it obscenely high just begs the question.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 03-23-22, 01:32 PM
  #52  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,785

Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Liked 363 Times in 261 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions View Post
If the fine was lower, it wouldn't be much of a deterrent.
Exactly. The goal of a legitimate regulation should be to entirely prevent the illicit behavior, with the result that no one is ever assessed the fine anyway. It's pretty hard to accidentally climb over a high fence.

Contrast something like NYC's "stipulated" fines program where commercial operators agree to just pay some percentage of parking tickets without challenging any of them. Such an illegitimate program exists to let things like parking in the bike lane simply be a cost of doing business.
UniChris is offline  
Old 03-23-22, 08:58 PM
  #53  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,634
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 510 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark View Post
And of course there is the simple issue of erosion control.
Because cyclists and hikers both f up trails by cutting switchbacks and other things that decrease effectiveness of erosion control tactics. They also spread out trails around inconvenient terrain. In general, left to their own devices, harm the land.

My guess is that this particular incident in the op is the result of a long standing problem by users who think they know better than land managers and the hefty fine reflects the ongoing problem and ramped up enforcement that is necessary.
Camilo is offline  
Likes For Camilo:
Old 03-24-22, 06:03 AM
  #54  
livedarklions
High Performance Noodler
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 13,185

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6868 Post(s)
Liked 6,782 Times in 3,814 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
Because cyclists and hikers both f up trails by cutting switchbacks and other things that decrease effectiveness of erosion control tactics. They also spread out trails around inconvenient terrain. In general, left to their own devices, harm the land.

My guess is that this particular incident in the op is the result of a long standing problem by users who think they know better than land managers and the hefty fine reflects the ongoing problem and ramped up enforcement that is necessary.
Exactly!
The existence of a trail is, pretty much by definition, a disruption of the soil. It's erosion all by itself and erosion tends to spread, even without further human intervention. You point out also the domino effect, one trail leads to another and another after that.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 03-24-22, 08:53 AM
  #55  
indyfabz
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 34,830
Mentioned: 202 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15909 Post(s)
Liked 10,155 Times in 4,950 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
Because cyclists and hikers both f up trails by cutting switchbacks and other things that decrease effectiveness of erosion control tactics.
When I did my first backcountry backpack trip (7-days in Glacier N.P.) not cutting switchbacks was one thing I learned early on from my guide. We encountered a few good-sized groups out for day hikes doing it. He even spoke up to one group about it as the passed us going in the other direction.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 03-25-22, 08:26 PM
  #56  
Joe Bikerider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 635

Bikes: 1969 Peugeot PX10, 1992 Della Santa, Linus Roadster 8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 594 Post(s)
Liked 349 Times in 202 Posts
And your point is? Getting back to the original post he got caught hoisting his bike over a fence to access an illegally created trail in a restricted watershed. I think $600 was too low. Should cost at least $1000 for the obvious infraction and not understanding about laws.
Joe Bikerider is offline  
Likes For Joe Bikerider:
Old 03-27-22, 03:14 AM
  #57  
livedarklions
High Performance Noodler
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 13,185

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6868 Post(s)
Liked 6,782 Times in 3,814 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Bikerider View Post
And your point is? Getting back to the original post he got caught hoisting his bike over a fence to access an illegally created trail in a restricted watershed. I think $600 was too low. Should cost at least $1000 for the obvious infraction and not understanding about laws.

That's what I find so ironic about all these people whining about the size of the fine--obviously, if the fence isn't deterring them, the fine has got to be high if there's any chance for it to deter.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 04-22-22, 04:14 PM
  #58  
frogman
Senior Member
 
frogman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 863

Bikes: Wife says I have too many :-)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 150 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Bikerider View Post
And your point is? Getting back to the original post he got caught hoisting his bike over a fence to access an illegally created trail in a restricted watershed. I think $600 was too low. Should cost at least $1000 for the obvious infraction and not understanding about laws.

Exactly.......... And he is complaining about getting caught. This is hilarious !
frogman is offline  
Old 04-22-22, 05:15 PM
  #59  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 8,517

Bikes: 85 team Miyata (modern 5800 105) , '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1745 Post(s)
Liked 1,374 Times in 834 Posts
Originally Posted by Comfort is King View Post
Just like all other cash fines, it's fundamentally unfair. While $600 might be quite a deterrent and/or penalty for most, for many it wouldn't have any effect. It doesn't seem right how one person should lose a week's pay, while the next looses one day's. This holds especially true for speeding. Wealthy people with sports cars treat some of the best cycling roads as race tracks, essentially with impunity, because whatever fine is a joke to them.
easy answer is not speeding just like not crossing climbing a fence
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light 56,57 or so)

squirtdad is offline  
Likes For squirtdad:
Old 04-23-22, 08:40 PM
  #60  
Kat12
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times in 188 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
easy answer is not speeding just like not crossing climbing a fence
And, of course, in the world {full} of "things that are unfair because people with a lot of money don't have as much of a burden as people who don't have a lot of money"... I would say this is pretty far down the list in importance.
Kat12 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.