Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

How tall are you and what frame size do you ride?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

How tall are you and what frame size do you ride?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-22, 08:22 AM
  #151  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 740 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Yes I do have short legs for my height, but it is the reach - not the stack - that has me on the smaller frames. This is likely apparent if you look at the pic of my bike above.
If you have a short inseam it would seem you would have a long reach. And, if you really ride a 48-50 frame I'm guessing you would need a long stem, I'm thinking very long, to accommodate your reach. No?
bruce19 is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 10:20 AM
  #152  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
If you have a short inseam it would seem you would have a long reach. And, if you really ride a 48-50 frame I'm guessing you would need a long stem, I'm thinking very long, to accommodate your reach. No?
No. If you re-read what I wrote, it is the REACH that pushes me to the smaller size frames, not the stack.

Look at my setup in the pic above (the red Fog Cutter). I am running a 60-70mm stem (I forget which) and short reach bars. If I went to a larger size frame I would need a 50mm stem.

I know why you are thinking the way you are about this (short legs + long torso = long reach), and I did so as well for a long time. It is a common assumption which is correct more often than not, but not always. As I learned through my fitting, there is more to fit than height and leg to torso ratio. I can’t explain why the stack/reach number I use work better for me… they just do.

As I said earlier, I used to ride 52-54cm bikes because that is what someone my height “should” ride. Turns out I (and conventional wisdom) were wrong. This current setup fits me much, much better. And luckily I am not bothered by what the fashion police think.
Kapusta is offline  
Likes For Kapusta:
Old 02-21-22, 07:22 PM
  #153  
GBK233
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 244

Bikes: 2020 Giant Advanced 2, 2020 Giant Contend AR1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 34 Posts
6ft. I ride a Large Defy and my spare bike is a M/L Contend. Large seems perfect, but the M/L feels pretty darn good also. I put a slightly longer stem on the Contend.
GBK233 is offline  
Old 02-22-22, 09:49 AM
  #154  
Ubie
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 20,000 leagues under the sea
Posts: 458

Bikes: 2019 CO-OP DRT 1.2, 2001 Trek 2200, 2021 Cannondale Topstone 1 Alloy

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
5'6" with a 29" inseam.
According to the Trek bike sizing chart I should ride a "Double check your measurements", ha!
I ride a size 'S' on my Cannondale Topstone, but otherwise would need about a 51 or 52, depending for my road bikes.
Size M for the Co-Op DRT 1.2, in the past I've been most comfortable on a 17" MTB frame.
My Stevens is a 56cm and it was too big. Have since passed it on to the spawn. He's 5'10"-ish with a 34" inseam. Only gone on one ride so far for him, and it may be a *hair* cramped. If so it may be going back to my cousin that gave it to us.
Ubie is offline  
Old 02-22-22, 09:59 AM
  #155  
Welshboy
PBP Ancien (2007)
 
Welshboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 358

Bikes: Cannondale CAADX (for commuting), Cannondale CAAD12, Cannondale CAAD12 Team CNCPT, Giant Contend 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 156 Times in 106 Posts
5'8" and 21.5", 54cm and Medium all work for me!
Welshboy is offline  
Old 02-22-22, 10:49 AM
  #156  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,608

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,481 Times in 4,184 Posts
6'5

Road bikes with 635mm - 655mm of stack height and 390mm-410mm of reach are what I own. Stem height and length as well as bar geometry can get me to ideal once I have a frame in those ranges.
Ideal fit is 650mm stack with 405mm of reach.

This fits best.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 02-22-22, 11:05 AM
  #157  
SpeedyBlueBiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Redmond, WA & Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 565

Bikes: 1999 Giant ATX MTB, 2002 Lemond Zurich, 2018 Fuji Transonic 2.3, 2019 Specialized Tarmac Disc Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 391 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
6'5

Road bikes with 635mm - 655mm of stack height and 390mm-410mm of reach are what I own. Stem height and length as well as bar geometry can get me to ideal once I have a frame in those ranges.
Ideal fit is 650mm stack with 405mm of reach.

This fits best.
A friend of mine is 6'9" (ex-basketball player of course) I'll have to show him this photo.
SpeedyBlueBiker is offline  
Old 02-26-22, 12:21 AM
  #158  
raulidesdmileto
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yo mido 1.65, estoy usando una 21" y creo que esta grande
raulidesdmileto is offline  
Old 02-26-22, 12:33 AM
  #159  
raulidesdmileto
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
no deberias usar una 48? o19"
raulidesdmileto is offline  
Old 02-27-22, 11:42 PM
  #160  
SteveInConverse
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Texas
Posts: 42

Bikes: Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 15 Posts
6'1" and ride an XL frame Trek FX1
SteveInConverse is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 12:08 AM
  #161  
steelywheelie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
6’4” and prefer 58-ish for a drop-bar bike — but definitely XL for flat-handle bikes
steelywheelie is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 10:04 AM
  #162  
cmello
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6' 5", 64cm
cmello is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 10:30 AM
  #163  
Juan Foote
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
 
Juan Foote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299

Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 686 Posts
I (was) 6'3" and have ridden bikes between 56-61cm. Since my amputation I tend towards a bit smaller bike than what might be ideal so that I can readily reach the ground without top bar in the goods. I tend to look for a geometry that is lower top tube height but longer reach. My current bikes are 58 and XL
Juan Foote is offline  
Old 03-01-22, 02:07 AM
  #164  
ColonelSanders
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130

Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times in 218 Posts
Originally Posted by TK LP
I’m 6’4”, both my frames are 66cm.



Originally Posted by Kenneth Luis


My height 177.5 cm , I ride a TREK Emonda ALR size 54.
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Yep. I need a short reach for my height.

That 50cm size is assuming traditional (non-compact) frame. My current frame is a 48cm Fog cutter (sloping top tube).


Beautiful bikes Gentleman.

All a bit different from each other, but all are stunners.
ColonelSanders is offline  
Old 03-02-22, 08:18 AM
  #165  
Bigdarbs
Junior Member
 
Bigdarbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
175 with a 53cm top tube length (seat tube frame sizing is not the critical measurement, its all about the top tube)
Bigdarbs is offline  
Old 03-02-22, 09:58 AM
  #166  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,608

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,481 Times in 4,184 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigdarbs
175 with a 53cm top tube length (seat tube frame sizing is not the critical measurement, its all about the top tube)
...or is it all about the stack and reach since top tube length is just as meaningless as seat tube length?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-02-22, 02:09 PM
  #167  
PBC peugeot
Junior Member
 
PBC peugeot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: roads & trails
Posts: 181

Bikes: 1972 Raleigh international, 1975 Raleigh professional, 1978 ALAN criterium, 1981 Pinnarello Traviso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 22 Posts
tall enough
the size that fits
PBC peugeot is offline  
Old 03-03-22, 11:59 AM
  #168  
Michellemayer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
ciclistas que medem de 1,60 m a 1,70 m geralmente os quadros ficam entre 50 a 53 cm.
Despite all this information, is it still difficult to choose the frame size? A practical tip is to ride on a friend's bike that has a frame the size you intend to buy. In general, smaller frames are lighter and more agile and larger ones are more stable and comfortable.

When evaluating measurements, manufacturers usually quote the vertical pipe measurement first and then the horizontal pipe measurement. When there is only one measurement, it is understood that the two tubes are the same size (square frame).

In the case of sloping frames, the slope must be neglected. You can measure with the tape measure parallel to the floor.

A very important measurement in relation to the frame is the height. The length can be adjusted by changing the table. There are table options from 7 to 14 cm, with gradations from 0.5 to 0.5 cm.

For MTBs, there's a nifty rule you can use: measure your horse's height, convert to inches and subtract 14.

For example, if your horse measures 83 cm, that means 32.67 inches. Subtracting 14 (32.67-14) gives you 18.67 inches. So the ideal frame would be 18.5 inches.

Although it sounds like a lot of information, remember that choosing the ideal frame size is very important, as this is the most difficult component to change on a bike. And don't forget that the other items on your bike must be compatible with your frame size, such as wheels and fork.
Michellemayer is offline  
Old 03-03-22, 12:11 PM
  #169  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,608

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,481 Times in 4,184 Posts
Originally Posted by Michellemayer
For example, if your horse measures 83 cm, that means 32.67 inches.
32.67 inches? That isnt even a pony, much less a horse...thats a Miniature Horse! Those little guys have no soul and bite. Crazy little Napoleonic demons.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 03-12-22, 09:27 AM
  #170  
philburden
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 14

Bikes: KHS Vitamin B, Giant TCR C3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I'm 6'0 and a 55.5cm from Giant is just about right!
philburden is offline  
Old 03-15-22, 07:16 AM
  #171  
TokyoRam
Junior Member
 
TokyoRam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 5

Bikes: Raleigh Grifter, 2000 Diamindback X-Link Sport, generic folding bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
5'10". Ride a 52.
TokyoRam is offline  
Old 03-15-22, 04:51 PM
  #172  
Calsun
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,280
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times in 288 Posts
It varies greatly depending on the frame geometry. Bike frames in the 1970's had the geometry of a criterium race bike and guys had very long seat posts and handlebar stems to compensate. Very unformfortable for riding any distance. In the 1980's the advent of triathalons generated more interest in what today we would call relaxed geometry as typified by the Dave Scott bikes. For distance riding I do not want to be bunched up on the bike but want my torso to be straight and relaxed and have the front bars within reach without being at a tight angle with my chest. For touring I had a custom frame made to my specifications and it was a 59cm frame but with far from stock angles using custom made lugs.

Check the bike sizing and seat adjustment charts that show how your body should be positioned on the frame, and if need be get on a bike and have someone take pictures with your phone so you can see your shape while on the bike.
Calsun is offline  
Old 03-15-22, 05:12 PM
  #173  
Rocket-Sauce 
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,644

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,852 Times in 1,055 Posts
193 cm tall. I ride anything from 59-64cm (ctc), My favorite bikes have stack around ~63 +/- and reach around 40 +/-
Rocket-Sauce is offline  
Old 03-16-22, 01:04 PM
  #174  
c_m_shooter
Senior Member
 
c_m_shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087

Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 166 Posts
5'8" and ride 55cm road bikes and 18 inch mountain bikes.
c_m_shooter is offline  
Old 03-16-22, 01:39 PM
  #175  
mprince
Dont fix whats not broken
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 302

Bikes: Steelman Stage Race, Dura-Ace 9s

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 166 Times in 93 Posts
6'4" with a 36.25" cycling inseam. My bike is 60 cm top tube, 60 cm seat tube (ctc) with a 12 cm stem.
mprince is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.