N+1 - 1979 Trek 710
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
N+1 - 1979 Trek 710
I acquired another bike I did not need this evening, a 1979 Trek 710. I did not talk to the prior owner, but I understand he bought the bike new and it was a custom build (which I think was normal for the 710). The frame appears straight and sound, but the paint is not great. Gorgeous midnight blue color but probably 10-20% scrapes. A little rust, but it looks like from riding in weather, not from being left out in the back yard. I could not look inside because the seatpost is stuck hard.
The component mix is unusual. Galli hubs and brake levers (gold to match the head badge), but Weinman centerpull calipers. Campy dropouts and shifter levers but Suntour derailleurs. Shimano 600 headset, Super Mighty cranks, well-worn Blackburn rear rack. AVA death-stem that appears at least 10 years older than the bike.
I own two other early 80s Treks, a 500 and a 614. Honestly, I was not that impressed with either. Solid mid range bikes (emphasis on solid and mid-range). The 614 has been for sale for months with no takers and the 500 is at the trailer by the lake for grocery runs. They are both that gun-metal blue color that about 90% of Treks from that era are.
As soon as I picked up the 710 I could tell it was a totally different sort of bike, without even looking at the crib sheet for the incomprehensible Trek model hierarchy. I was able to ride it for a few hundred yards and it just feels like a high end bike. The seatpost is stuck at a height that would work for me for city riding if I decided not to resort to an immediate escalation of force. The price was very reasonable so I would say it is a no-lose proposition, except for the too-many-bikes issue.
I'll try to get a picture or two tomorrow.
The component mix is unusual. Galli hubs and brake levers (gold to match the head badge), but Weinman centerpull calipers. Campy dropouts and shifter levers but Suntour derailleurs. Shimano 600 headset, Super Mighty cranks, well-worn Blackburn rear rack. AVA death-stem that appears at least 10 years older than the bike.
I own two other early 80s Treks, a 500 and a 614. Honestly, I was not that impressed with either. Solid mid range bikes (emphasis on solid and mid-range). The 614 has been for sale for months with no takers and the 500 is at the trailer by the lake for grocery runs. They are both that gun-metal blue color that about 90% of Treks from that era are.
As soon as I picked up the 710 I could tell it was a totally different sort of bike, without even looking at the crib sheet for the incomprehensible Trek model hierarchy. I was able to ride it for a few hundred yards and it just feels like a high end bike. The seatpost is stuck at a height that would work for me for city riding if I decided not to resort to an immediate escalation of force. The price was very reasonable so I would say it is a no-lose proposition, except for the too-many-bikes issue.
I'll try to get a picture or two tomorrow.
Likes For albrt:
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Here are a few pictures.
Likes For albrt:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
Not that familiar with the 710 but it has longer stays than I would have expected. Great find and it looks good.
Interesting rear rack mounting!
Original Campy axle adjusting screws too!
Interesting rear rack mounting!
Original Campy axle adjusting screws too!
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#4
Junior Member
My 81 710 is a great rider. Too bad its too small for me
#5
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times
in
1,557 Posts
I got rid of mine years ago once I found out I could not trust the handling under touring load; too spooky on descents. Wanted to love it but could not.
#6
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
Congratulations and good luck!!!
I've read of other people saying this same thing... the early (76-85) nomenclature system completely makes more sense than any other bike's naming convention.
A 900 series bike is ALWAYS COLUMBUS
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
There's a few models interspersed- but for the most part- the VAST majority of the bikes you see you can tell a racing from a tourer by the distance between the tire and seat tube.
The point is if it's a 700 model, you know it's 531/531. If it's a 600 series model, you know it's 531 with CrMo or some sort of MnMo fork and stays... and so forth...
I've read of other people saying this same thing... the early (76-85) nomenclature system completely makes more sense than any other bike's naming convention.
A 900 series bike is ALWAYS COLUMBUS
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
There's a few models interspersed- but for the most part- the VAST majority of the bikes you see you can tell a racing from a tourer by the distance between the tire and seat tube.
The point is if it's a 700 model, you know it's 531/531. If it's a 600 series model, you know it's 531 with CrMo or some sort of MnMo fork and stays... and so forth...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Thanks for the primer - I had sort of figured this out (probably more than once) from looking at the catalogs, but I always manage to get confused again. I think the system is counterintuitive unless you're a serious tubing enthusiast - most people would think the type of bike is the most important piece of information so it should be the first number.
#8
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,545
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Liked 1,809 Times
in
820 Posts
A 900 series bike is ALWAYS COLUMBUS
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
Al, hopefully that seatpost will understand that cooperation with the new owner is preferable to other fates.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
I reassembled the overly complicated seatpost clamp and I think I'll ride it a bit - if a seatpost is going to come loose it's usually while I'm trying to ride.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
The bars are GB, look about the same vintage as the stem. The rims are 36-hole Super Champion Gentleman. Seatpost still stuck, but rides great other than that.
Likes For albrt:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
I wish you the best on the stuck post.
Several years ago, when I was commuting, I parked my bike in a bike room in the building I worked in. One of the other commuters rode a Langster. I thought it looked kinda cool and was thinking about SS/FG as an option for n+1. In our discussion he showed me how the top of the post came loose allowing the saddle to rotate freely and the post was too low for him. He couldn't get it to move. A bolt through the pillar and head solved the rotation problem. I brought Kroil with me and periodically applied it to the post over a 3-4 month period.
I didn't see him for a couple of weeks until I ran into him in the shower room, not literally! He had left his bike outside of his apartment locked to a railing and found it Sunday morning without wheels and cockpit. He was done with it, saying he was going to put it on CL for $100. My response was to ask for first right of refusal. Two weeks later he offered it to me without the brakes.
I countered with $50 and the brakes with the comment that the seat post was still stuck and if I couldn't get it out, I would have nothing. Sold.
Well it wasn't just the post, the BB was toast too.
P1030270 by Patrick Boulden, on Flickr
The post went from this stage
P1030267 by superissimo_83, on Flickr
to the final stage after lye treatment pf
WP_20160107_001 by superissimo_83, on Flickr
About as thin as AL sheet in your kitchen drawer.
Endded up with about $250 invested to get this
2010 Langster Steel 61cm by superissimo_83, on Flickr
Frame is a bit on the large side but not when riding. Great ride too. Well worth the effort and expense
Several years ago, when I was commuting, I parked my bike in a bike room in the building I worked in. One of the other commuters rode a Langster. I thought it looked kinda cool and was thinking about SS/FG as an option for n+1. In our discussion he showed me how the top of the post came loose allowing the saddle to rotate freely and the post was too low for him. He couldn't get it to move. A bolt through the pillar and head solved the rotation problem. I brought Kroil with me and periodically applied it to the post over a 3-4 month period.
I didn't see him for a couple of weeks until I ran into him in the shower room, not literally! He had left his bike outside of his apartment locked to a railing and found it Sunday morning without wheels and cockpit. He was done with it, saying he was going to put it on CL for $100. My response was to ask for first right of refusal. Two weeks later he offered it to me without the brakes.
I countered with $50 and the brakes with the comment that the seat post was still stuck and if I couldn't get it out, I would have nothing. Sold.
Well it wasn't just the post, the BB was toast too.
P1030270 by Patrick Boulden, on Flickr
The post went from this stage
P1030267 by superissimo_83, on Flickr
to the final stage after lye treatment pf
WP_20160107_001 by superissimo_83, on Flickr
About as thin as AL sheet in your kitchen drawer.
Endded up with about $250 invested to get this
2010 Langster Steel 61cm by superissimo_83, on Flickr
Frame is a bit on the large side but not when riding. Great ride too. Well worth the effort and expense
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Last edited by SJX426; 03-17-23 at 04:47 AM.
#12
Full Member
>> it was a custom build (which I think was normal for the 710).
I've got a 1978 710, see https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...710-story.html. The first post has the serial number with decoder ring at the bottom. We have the same model, color, and size, built a year and a month apart.
Mine has cable guides on the top tube; I saw an order sheet where you could specify just about any braze-on, with prices of a few dollars each. In that sense, they were probably all "custom" though they may have been ordered by the stores, not the individual customers. The clamps are kind of silly, but they have a very retro, classy vibe. I'd take it either way. I also read somewhere that a 'frame-only' order would get the N00 model number, while the teen digits denoted the models for complete bikes. I can't remember the source.
When I showed my 710 to the longtime owner of the LBS, he right said, that's the way they came back then. By which he meant the kit on my bike -- Suntour, SR, Rigida... It seems weird that you'd order the frame a specific way, but then the bike would be sold with standard equipment.
There doesn't seem to be a single part our frames have in common. Well, maybe the seat post binder with the imperial threads
I hope you get the seatpost out so you can enjoy it properly set up.
cheers -mathias
I've got a 1978 710, see https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...710-story.html. The first post has the serial number with decoder ring at the bottom. We have the same model, color, and size, built a year and a month apart.
Mine has cable guides on the top tube; I saw an order sheet where you could specify just about any braze-on, with prices of a few dollars each. In that sense, they were probably all "custom" though they may have been ordered by the stores, not the individual customers. The clamps are kind of silly, but they have a very retro, classy vibe. I'd take it either way. I also read somewhere that a 'frame-only' order would get the N00 model number, while the teen digits denoted the models for complete bikes. I can't remember the source.
When I showed my 710 to the longtime owner of the LBS, he right said, that's the way they came back then. By which he meant the kit on my bike -- Suntour, SR, Rigida... It seems weird that you'd order the frame a specific way, but then the bike would be sold with standard equipment.
There doesn't seem to be a single part our frames have in common. Well, maybe the seat post binder with the imperial threads
I hope you get the seatpost out so you can enjoy it properly set up.
cheers -mathias
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
Congratulations and good luck!!!
I've read of other people saying this same thing... the early (76-85) nomenclature system completely makes more sense than any other bike's naming convention.
A 900 series bike is ALWAYS COLUMBUS
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
There's a few models interspersed- but for the most part- the VAST majority of the bikes you see you can tell a racing from a tourer by the distance between the tire and seat tube.
The point is if it's a 700 model, you know it's 531/531. If it's a 600 series model, you know it's 531 with CrMo or some sort of MnMo fork and stays... and so forth...
I've read of other people saying this same thing... the early (76-85) nomenclature system completely makes more sense than any other bike's naming convention.
A 900 series bike is ALWAYS COLUMBUS
A 700 series bike is ALWAYS 531 frame/fork+stays
A 600 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a 531 main frame with CrMo or some MnMo fork and stays
A 500 series bike is ALWAYS going to have a CrMo frame, most often with CrMo stays and fork
400 series bikes kinda change from year to year
200-300 series bikes are ALWAYS Hi-Ten
An X10 bike is ALWAYS going to be a sport/touring model
An X30 is ALWAYS going to be a "racing" model
x20 bikes are ALWAYS touring bikes
There's a few models interspersed- but for the most part- the VAST majority of the bikes you see you can tell a racing from a tourer by the distance between the tire and seat tube.
The point is if it's a 700 model, you know it's 531/531. If it's a 600 series model, you know it's 531 with CrMo or some sort of MnMo fork and stays... and so forth...
900 700 500 300 are Col, Reynolds, Ishiwata, and Hi-ten
600/400 Reynolds/Ishiwata triangle and chromo, manga, or hi-ten fork and stays. Same information, but that's how my brain organizes it.
Last edited by Chr0m0ly; 03-18-23 at 02:53 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Nothing to report, sorry to say. Rode the bike again today and Francisco Franco is still dead (aka seatpost still stuck).
If I ever get the seatpost out, does anybody know a good painter in the Phoenix area? I love the original color but it's in pretty rough shape. This might be the bike for my first full restore.
If I ever get the seatpost out, does anybody know a good painter in the Phoenix area? I love the original color but it's in pretty rough shape. This might be the bike for my first full restore.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Tried alternating heat and cold on the seatpost, no luck, so I started jailbreaking. The walls of the post are thicker than I had hoped. Three vertical cuts so far and it's not moving. Back at it tomorrow.
#16
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,545
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Liked 1,809 Times
in
820 Posts
Andy Gilmour in Tucson is charging $300 for a frame repaint, but the price list is dated 2018.
Only other ideas I can think of might be an auto body shop or motorcycle shop. Maybe 1110 has some good go-to guys.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Since I posted that, I'm actually leaning more toward just cleaning it up and clear-coating over the patina. I'm thinking this bike may end up in Ohio where it will get ridden more.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Now up to 6 vertical cuts. Not moving. Need to go back with a fresh saw blade and try to make sure the cuts go through all the way to the bottom of the post.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Well, I finally got that sucker out. Thanks to dddd for advice on another thread, especially using a sharpened spoke to detect where the vertical cuts were not going all the way through the seatpost.
Likes For albrt:
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 905
Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
329 Posts
Here are a couple of pictures of the bike on a tour through northeast Ohio last week. It performed admirably.
I like the bike a lot, but I would agree with thunmpism's comment above that it's too flexy for heavy load. The mini-panniers on the back didn't cause much trouble, but I think a load on the front would make it too wobbly.
I like the bike a lot, but I would agree with thunmpism's comment above that it's too flexy for heavy load. The mini-panniers on the back didn't cause much trouble, but I think a load on the front would make it too wobbly.
Likes For albrt: