Making It Easier To Prosecute
#1
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
Making It Easier To Prosecute
Aside from enacting friendlier laws, I would love it for every state to make it easier to prosecute existing ones. In the United Kingdom a cyclist can get a motorist cited merely by sending the police video of an infraction. So long as the plate and driver's face are clearly visible, issuing a citation is very easy and typically results in fines of several hundred pounds. I don't know of a state in the US where it's that easy. Typically, if no collision occurs, an officer has to witness the violation. Otherwise, you have to get hit for law enforcement to do anything. If there are any lawyers who frequent this subforum, I'd like to know why we don't use the UK's model and why it's so hard to change our existing one.
#2
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,955
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
526 Posts
A number of years ago I had a very, very close call and was almost hit by an impatient driver who did something both arrogant and stupid. I usually just brush things off, but this one was so outrageous that I contacted the police. The deal was that I was stopped at a red light positioned in the left side of the lane with the stupid driver right behind. I had signaled my intention turn left before I stopped, but am unsure whether this motorist saw it. When the light turned, I proceeded to start my turn only to be surprised by this lady as she zoomed by me on my left. Had it all on camera including a shot of her face and a clear plate number.
I reported it by phone and an officer called me back. 1) he refused to even look at my video. 2) Told me that since I was not hit, there was nothing he could do 3) and then he started this long discussion about how cyclists need to obey all of the laws and how many cyclists he sees that don't ... and how many of them get injured, etc. I had to interrupt him to tell him that this was irrelevant to my report and asked again for him to look at my video. He refused again, but did offer to do a license check. Never heard back.
I do understand that the police have to be a primary observer in order to make a charge; however video is very powerful and it sure would be nice if they accepted it in support of a charge. I do know that I could swear out a warrant but proving the complaint sufficiently for the motorist to be charged is tough.
Can't answer your question, though.
I reported it by phone and an officer called me back. 1) he refused to even look at my video. 2) Told me that since I was not hit, there was nothing he could do 3) and then he started this long discussion about how cyclists need to obey all of the laws and how many cyclists he sees that don't ... and how many of them get injured, etc. I had to interrupt him to tell him that this was irrelevant to my report and asked again for him to look at my video. He refused again, but did offer to do a license check. Never heard back.
I do understand that the police have to be a primary observer in order to make a charge; however video is very powerful and it sure would be nice if they accepted it in support of a charge. I do know that I could swear out a warrant but proving the complaint sufficiently for the motorist to be charged is tough.
Can't answer your question, though.
#3
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
With the video you could have filed charges against the other person. You could have testified to the authenticity of the video. On the other hand to anyone else the video is just hearsay of unknown providence. That is as it should be.
If you feel strongly about this and want to make a difference you should use the video you say is proof, file charges and let system work.
If you feel strongly about this and want to make a difference you should use the video you say is proof, file charges and let system work.
Last edited by Hawkowl2; 08-26-19 at 06:13 PM.
#4
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
With the video you could have filed charges against the other person. You could have testified to the authenticity of the video. On the other hand to anyone else the video is just hearsay of unknown providence. That is as it should be.
If you feel strongly about this and want to make a difference you should use the video you say is proof, file charges and let system work.
If you feel strongly about this and want to make a difference you should use the video you say is proof, file charges and let system work.
#5
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
There may be someplace in the US where a citizen cannot file a complaint against someone else. But I don't know where that might be. Then you are the prosecutor. Not a common thing. But it is done.
#6
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
We're talking criminal charges, which are the only kind used in this context.
Anyone can file a complaint; everyone knows that. Not everyone can formally file (AKA "press" for those who watch too much CSI) charges, because you have to be a district attorney. DAs only file charges after police have conducted an investigation.
Anyone can file a complaint; everyone knows that. Not everyone can formally file (AKA "press" for those who watch too much CSI) charges, because you have to be a district attorney. DAs only file charges after police have conducted an investigation.
#7
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,955
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
526 Posts
While a citizen can file a civil case for damages against another, he or she cannot file directly for criminal charges. That's up to the prosecutors.
In the absence of a citation or arrest by the police, which may then lead to charges by the prosecutor, the only recourse a citizen has is to go before a magistrate or judge and swear out a bench warrant. This involves stating under oath why you think a crime has been committed and presenting your evidence. If the magistrate or judge agrees, then a warrant is issued.
Good luck with this process when you are only reporting a minor traffic offense.
In the absence of a citation or arrest by the police, which may then lead to charges by the prosecutor, the only recourse a citizen has is to go before a magistrate or judge and swear out a bench warrant. This involves stating under oath why you think a crime has been committed and presenting your evidence. If the magistrate or judge agrees, then a warrant is issued.
Good luck with this process when you are only reporting a minor traffic offense.
#8
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Going back to the first post. Asking the System to do something over a scare is surely a non-starter. Other than a possible traffic infraction, from what was posted, that is what happened. Close calls seldom get citations, or even a nod of the head.
The broader question is how responsive the DA should be. Frankly, there is no use whining about it. But there are time proven ways to make the prosecutor care.
More fundamentally, I'm glad our basic rights are not being compromised.
The broader question is how responsive the DA should be. Frankly, there is no use whining about it. But there are time proven ways to make the prosecutor care.
More fundamentally, I'm glad our basic rights are not being compromised.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Going back to the first post. Asking the System to do something over a scare is surely a non-starter. Other than a possible traffic infraction, from what was posted, that is what happened. Close calls seldom get citations, or even a nod of the head.
The broader question is how responsive the DA should be. Frankly, there is no use whining about it. But there are time proven ways to make the prosecutor care.
More fundamentally, I'm glad our basic rights are not being compromised.
The broader question is how responsive the DA should be. Frankly, there is no use whining about it. But there are time proven ways to make the prosecutor care.
More fundamentally, I'm glad our basic rights are not being compromised.
#10
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
#11
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
In the absence of a citation or arrest by the police, which may then lead to charges by the prosecutor, the only recourse a citizen has is to go before a magistrate or judge and swear out a bench warrant. This involves stating under oath why you think a crime has been committed and presenting your evidence. If the magistrate or judge agrees, then a warrant is issued.
Good luck with this process when you are only reporting a minor traffic offense.
Good luck with this process when you are only reporting a minor traffic offense.
#12
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
From what was posted it appears the OP wants punitive action taken against people based an unsubstantiated video. That purportedly shows someone in a close call that scared the OP.
Last edited by Hawkowl2; 08-27-19 at 05:18 PM.
#13
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
#15
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
#18
The dropped
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,406
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
Likes For Unca_Sam:
#19
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
6th Amendment!
* scoffs *
Likes For Lemond1985:
#20
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
The accuser in this instance would be the person testifying that the video is authentic and that it depicts the driver violating the law. All the 6th Amendment guarantees is the right to cross examine that person.
#21
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
How does the presentation of video evidence in court violate the 6th amendment? That's ridiculous.
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 344
Bikes: GR300, Grail, Live Wire, 5010
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 241 Times
in
121 Posts
What person? I was answering the question about a cop mailing you a ticket. There was no person mentioned in that scenario.
#23
The dropped
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,406
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
Did you hear a "clang-clang??"
Everything is fine and dandy when you deal with hypothetical situations. You have clear video evidence of a motorist operating a motor vehicle in violation of traffic laws, which is clear and convincing and leaves out no context. You show that your version of events hews closest to the video presented to the court. The video can be shown to be uncut and unedited. All for a $150 ticket for reckless operation and some points on a license.
Unfortunately, due to the presumption of innocence (key here), the amount of work required to demonstrate that an individual committed a traffic infraction beyond a reasonable doubt with no observing public safety officer (who are trained to provide testimony that can withstand cross-examination) is simply not worth the police or investigator's time. True, this could happen in an idyllic burgh where the police are looking for things to investigate, but any place where crimes involving injury to persons or loss of property take place will preferentially investigate and prosecute those crimes over a traffic infraction any day of the week. The populace would demand no less. This is why threatening someone can land you in jail for a month, while operating a vehicle recklessly will result in just a fine and a potentially restricted license.
While hitting someone in the pocketbook might make a dent in the problem, the true issue and best resolution lies with education. We're usually taught specific rules and penalties regarding driving while intoxicated and stopped school buses, but there's never a mention about what to do about bicycles or other slow traffic. In Ohio, you are allowed to cross a double yellow to pass if a vehicle is moving less than half the posted limit (obviously some wiggle room there). That covers tractors, carriages/buggys, and us pedalcycle users. I can understand a driver in a hurry being frustrated if they don't understand the law. They're important and have somewhere to be! Now I have to crawl along behind this selfish cyclist using the whole road when he can use the shoulder and let me through...
Unless we earn a special protected status on streets and roads with a splashy fine or penalty, a prosecutor won't look at it unless a cop wrote the ticket and will be the star witness. Ugly but true.
Unfortunately, due to the presumption of innocence (key here), the amount of work required to demonstrate that an individual committed a traffic infraction beyond a reasonable doubt with no observing public safety officer (who are trained to provide testimony that can withstand cross-examination) is simply not worth the police or investigator's time. True, this could happen in an idyllic burgh where the police are looking for things to investigate, but any place where crimes involving injury to persons or loss of property take place will preferentially investigate and prosecute those crimes over a traffic infraction any day of the week. The populace would demand no less. This is why threatening someone can land you in jail for a month, while operating a vehicle recklessly will result in just a fine and a potentially restricted license.
While hitting someone in the pocketbook might make a dent in the problem, the true issue and best resolution lies with education. We're usually taught specific rules and penalties regarding driving while intoxicated and stopped school buses, but there's never a mention about what to do about bicycles or other slow traffic. In Ohio, you are allowed to cross a double yellow to pass if a vehicle is moving less than half the posted limit (obviously some wiggle room there). That covers tractors, carriages/buggys, and us pedalcycle users. I can understand a driver in a hurry being frustrated if they don't understand the law. They're important and have somewhere to be! Now I have to crawl along behind this selfish cyclist using the whole road when he can use the shoulder and let me through...
Unless we earn a special protected status on streets and roads with a splashy fine or penalty, a prosecutor won't look at it unless a cop wrote the ticket and will be the star witness. Ugly but true.
#24
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
#25
Cop Magnet
Thread Starter
Unfortunately, due to the presumption of innocence (key here), the amount of work required to demonstrate that an individual committed a traffic infraction beyond a reasonable doubt with no observing public safety officer (who are trained to provide testimony that can withstand cross-examination) is simply not worth the police or investigator's time.
While hitting someone in the pocketbook might make a dent in the problem, the true issue and best resolution lies with education. We're usually taught specific rules and penalties regarding driving while intoxicated and stopped school buses, but there's never a mention about what to do about bicycles or other slow traffic. In Ohio, you are allowed to cross a double yellow to pass if a vehicle is moving less than half the posted limit (obviously some wiggle room there). That covers tractors, carriages/buggys, and us pedalcycle users. I can understand a driver in a hurry being frustrated if they don't understand the law. They're important and have somewhere to be! Now I have to crawl along behind this selfish cyclist using the whole road when he can use the shoulder and let me through...