Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS, power spline, Bottom Bracket differences

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS, power spline, Bottom Bracket differences

Old 04-17-11, 09:52 AM
  #1  
grasscutter
Come on, 5 more minutes..
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 161

Bikes: At last count... 31. 11-19-22.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 4 Posts
Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS, power spline, Bottom Bracket differences

Being a new(er) bike mechanic, found a really good pic for differences in bottom brackets, as I could not find solid references with pics on here.

Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.

Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.

In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bottom-bracket-interfaces.jpg (22.9 KB, 270 views)
grasscutter is offline  
Likes For grasscutter:
Old 04-17-11, 10:25 AM
  #2  
reptilezs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 2,896
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
power spline is not the same as isis. power spline requires a square taper crank puller
reptilezs is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 10:32 AM
  #3  
grasscutter
Come on, 5 more minutes..
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 161

Bikes: At last count... 31. 11-19-22.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 4 Posts
Ahh... I did not know that.

Is the difference only in type of puller to use?

Or are crank arms interchangeable on ISIS and Power Spline BB's?
grasscutter is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 12:20 PM
  #4  
reptilezs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 2,896
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
no they are different
reptilezs is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 03:22 PM
  #5  
davidad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times in 138 Posts
Kinda makes ya miss the old square taper doesn't it. The new and improved ain't so improved.
davidad is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 04:00 PM
  #6  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by davidad
The new and improved ain't so improved.
Some were and some weren't. Shimano's Octalink was a questionable improvement in weight and stiffness but at least their bottom brackets were durable and reliable. ISIS varied all over the map in terms of quality. Some were dreadful and some were pretty good.

The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
HillRider is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 04:56 PM
  #7  
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
External BB's are already outdated. Bleeding edge tech is press in bearings to 'cups' molded into frames.
operator is offline  
Old 04-19-11, 07:29 AM
  #8  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Some were and some weren't. Shimano's Octalink was a questionable improvement in weight and stiffness but at least their bottom brackets were durable and reliable. ISIS varied all over the map in terms of quality. Some were dreadful and some were pretty good.

The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
Increasing the rod into a tube and decreasing the leverage on that tube are damn fine ways to go about getting the same job done with less metal.

The principle is definitely sound; I just hope the industry can settle on a well-sorted, hassle-free standard.

Is there a particular means of securing crankarms associated with BB30, or does it just relate to the bearings and spindle?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 04-19-11, 08:50 AM
  #9  
well biked
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo

I just hope the industry can settle on a well-sorted, hassle-free standard.
I don't see that happening anytime soon. In our shop, we have new bikes with square taper bb's, splined spindle bb's, outboard bearing bb's, BB30 bb's, and Shimano's BB86 bb. As Sheldon said, "the problem with standards is that there are so many of them."
well biked is offline  
Old 06-11-11, 06:17 AM
  #10  
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
All these splined interfaces try to lock you in into the offering of the particular vendor. That's why I made it a firm and unchangeable policy to only purchase square taper BBs and cranks.
wroomwroomoops is offline  
Likes For wroomwroomoops:
Old 06-12-11, 02:19 AM
  #11  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Isn't BB30 the best contender for the next default standard?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 06-12-11, 02:34 AM
  #12  
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Isn't BB30 the best contender for the next default standard?
I sure as hell hope not. I like my existing frames.

BB30 is Yet Another Attempt from bicycle part industry to get hapless cyclists re-purchase their frames and cranksets. But that's OK; why would I mind that a fool and his money are soon parted.
wroomwroomoops is offline  
Likes For wroomwroomoops:
Old 06-12-11, 04:19 AM
  #13  
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Since hapless consumers have already had to repurchase their frames to fit the current plethora of integrated, semi-integrated, internal headsets, its a mystery to me why they still stick with the old standard BB shell.
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
Headsets go internal and bottom brackets go external!!
MichaelW is offline  
Old 06-12-11, 07:29 AM
  #14  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
BB30 is Yet Another Attempt from bicycle part industry to get hapless cyclists re-purchase their frames and cranksets. But that's OK; why would I mind that a fool and his money are soon parted.
Seems to me like a perfectly obvious way of lightening and/or strengthening a BB, dude. You know, that whole stiffness versus cross-section thing?

Stuff like this is simply evolution, like threadless steerers; deal with it.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 06-12-11, 08:43 AM
  #15  
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MichaelW
Since hapless consumers have already had to repurchase their frames to fit the current plethora of integrated, semi-integrated, internal headsets, its a mystery to me why they still stick with the old standard BB shell.
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
Only if they actually did jump on Yet Another Buzzwagon and bought into the ingrated and semi-integrated headset fad. And the eternal words again echo forcefully with truth: a fool and his money are soon parted.
wroomwroomoops is offline  
Old 06-12-11, 08:59 AM
  #16  
well biked
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Isn't BB30 the best contender for the next default standard?
BB30 is certainly becoming more common on mid level and higher end bikes, but it's got a lot of competition, and I doubt any of them, BB30 included, will become a "default standard." As I said in my earlier post, we have several types of bb's on new bikes in our shop, among them BB30, Shimano's BB86, threaded bb's w/ external bearings, square taper bb's, splined interface bb's (we've got at least one model of new mtb that uses Octalink), etc. On some mountain bikes, there's BB92 I believe, although we don't have any of these in our shop currently, I don't believe.

The highest end new bikes we currently have in our shop are Colnago's, and they have old-fashioned English threaded bb shells, and the bb's have external bearings We have some equipped with all three major component makers (Shimano, Campy, SRAM). We have one new Colnago Master X Light frameset, and it's Italian threaded.

Another thing to consider is that while these newer bb types are becoming more common, there are still SO MANY frames out there with conventional, threaded bb shells that there will always (at least into the foreseeable future) be a huge market for various types of threaded bb's.

Once again, I'll defer to what Sheldon said about "standards," quoted in my above post.
well biked is offline  
Old 06-13-11, 04:06 AM
  #17  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Of course the English threaded standard will persist, but it'd sure be nice if some those new BB standards die off to leave a clear winner.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 08-21-22, 11:38 AM
  #18  
Hotrodjoe
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by grasscutter
Being a new(er) bike mechanic, found a really good pic for differences in bottom brackets, as I could not find solid references with pics on here.

Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.

Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.

In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).

Attachment 198273
Thank you , Hotrodjoe
Hotrodjoe is offline  
Likes For Hotrodjoe:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sdmc530
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
02-14-18 11:57 AM
Ald1
Bicycle Mechanics
5
02-01-18 03:30 PM
Crush the Miles
Road Cycling
7
09-01-16 09:54 AM
ppg677
Classic & Vintage
2
07-01-15 05:44 PM
ilovecycling
Road Cycling
9
02-24-11 11:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.