Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS, power spline, Bottom Bracket differences
#1
Come on, 5 more minutes..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 161
Bikes: At last count... 31. 11-19-22.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
4 Posts
Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS, power spline, Bottom Bracket differences
Being a new(er) bike mechanic, found a really good pic for differences in bottom brackets, as I could not find solid references with pics on here.
Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.
Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.
In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).
Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.
Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.
In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).
Likes For grasscutter:
#3
Come on, 5 more minutes..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 161
Bikes: At last count... 31. 11-19-22.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
4 Posts
Ahh... I did not know that.
Is the difference only in type of puller to use?
Or are crank arms interchangeable on ISIS and Power Spline BB's?
Is the difference only in type of puller to use?
Or are crank arms interchangeable on ISIS and Power Spline BB's?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Some were and some weren't. Shimano's Octalink was a questionable improvement in weight and stiffness but at least their bottom brackets were durable and reliable. ISIS varied all over the map in terms of quality. Some were dreadful and some were pretty good.
The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
#8
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
Some were and some weren't. Shimano's Octalink was a questionable improvement in weight and stiffness but at least their bottom brackets were durable and reliable. ISIS varied all over the map in terms of quality. Some were dreadful and some were pretty good.
The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
The newest external cup bottom brackets have some theoretical benefits but how much they really change things for the better is highly debatable.
The principle is definitely sound; I just hope the industry can settle on a well-sorted, hassle-free standard.
Is there a particular means of securing crankarms associated with BB30, or does it just relate to the bearings and spindle?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
I don't see that happening anytime soon. In our shop, we have new bikes with square taper bb's, splined spindle bb's, outboard bearing bb's, BB30 bb's, and Shimano's BB86 bb. As Sheldon said, "the problem with standards is that there are so many of them."
#10
Sir Fallalot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
All these splined interfaces try to lock you in into the offering of the particular vendor. That's why I made it a firm and unchangeable policy to only purchase square taper BBs and cranks.
Likes For wroomwroomoops:
#11
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
Isn't BB30 the best contender for the next default standard?
#12
Sir Fallalot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
I sure as hell hope not. I like my existing frames.
BB30 is Yet Another Attempt from bicycle part industry to get hapless cyclists re-purchase their frames and cranksets. But that's OK; why would I mind that a fool and his money are soon parted.
BB30 is Yet Another Attempt from bicycle part industry to get hapless cyclists re-purchase their frames and cranksets. But that's OK; why would I mind that a fool and his money are soon parted.
Likes For wroomwroomoops:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Since hapless consumers have already had to repurchase their frames to fit the current plethora of integrated, semi-integrated, internal headsets, its a mystery to me why they still stick with the old standard BB shell.
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
Headsets go internal and bottom brackets go external!!
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
Headsets go internal and bottom brackets go external!!
#14
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
Stuff like this is simply evolution, like threadless steerers; deal with it.
#15
Sir Fallalot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
Since hapless consumers have already had to repurchase their frames to fit the current plethora of integrated, semi-integrated, internal headsets, its a mystery to me why they still stick with the old standard BB shell.
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
It makes sense to use the std shell with a std headset, but if you are going to break one standard, why keep the other?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
BB30 is certainly becoming more common on mid level and higher end bikes, but it's got a lot of competition, and I doubt any of them, BB30 included, will become a "default standard." As I said in my earlier post, we have several types of bb's on new bikes in our shop, among them BB30, Shimano's BB86, threaded bb's w/ external bearings, square taper bb's, splined interface bb's (we've got at least one model of new mtb that uses Octalink), etc. On some mountain bikes, there's BB92 I believe, although we don't have any of these in our shop currently, I don't believe.
The highest end new bikes we currently have in our shop are Colnago's, and they have old-fashioned English threaded bb shells, and the bb's have external bearings We have some equipped with all three major component makers (Shimano, Campy, SRAM). We have one new Colnago Master X Light frameset, and it's Italian threaded.
Another thing to consider is that while these newer bb types are becoming more common, there are still SO MANY frames out there with conventional, threaded bb shells that there will always (at least into the foreseeable future) be a huge market for various types of threaded bb's.
Once again, I'll defer to what Sheldon said about "standards," quoted in my above post.
The highest end new bikes we currently have in our shop are Colnago's, and they have old-fashioned English threaded bb shells, and the bb's have external bearings We have some equipped with all three major component makers (Shimano, Campy, SRAM). We have one new Colnago Master X Light frameset, and it's Italian threaded.
Another thing to consider is that while these newer bb types are becoming more common, there are still SO MANY frames out there with conventional, threaded bb shells that there will always (at least into the foreseeable future) be a huge market for various types of threaded bb's.
Once again, I'll defer to what Sheldon said about "standards," quoted in my above post.
#17
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
Of course the English threaded standard will persist, but it'd sure be nice if some those new BB standards die off to leave a clear winner.
#18
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Being a new(er) bike mechanic, found a really good pic for differences in bottom brackets, as I could not find solid references with pics on here.
Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.
Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.
In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).
Attachment 198273
Was replacing my TruVativ power spline 68x113 BB, and was mistakenly told an Octalink v2 would work as a replacement. That was not the case.
Anyways, thought this pic might help other newer mechanics who are learning the trade as they go.
In pic: from left to right is: Square Taper, Octalink v1, Octalink v2, ISIS (or TruVativ calls it Power spline).
Attachment 198273
Likes For Hotrodjoe: